Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 449–460 | Cite as

Classroom motivational environment influences on emotional and cognitive dimensions of student interest in mathematics

  • Colin Carmichael
  • Rosemary Callingham
  • Helen M. G. Watt
Original Article

Abstract

Interest has long been regarded as an important motivational construct in the learning of mathematics. It has been contended that the development of interest is directed by two control systems: an emotional and a cognitive. Under the former, students are attracted to activities that are enjoyable, whereas under the latter they consciously engage in tasks that might satisfy, for example, later goals. Younger students are more likely to associate emotional responses to interest-related stimuli, whereas older students tend to associate cognitive responses, suggesting qualitative developmental differences for students’ interest in mathematics. Yet there are differences between the classroom motivational environments experienced by primary/elementary vs. secondary school students, and the mathematical interest and enthusiasm likely felt and expressed by primary vs. secondary teachers, which may influence dimensions of student interest. Of concern in this study is the extent to which teacher enthusiasm impacts the classroom motivational environments (mastery vs. performance goal orientation) perceived by students and reported by teachers, and thereby dimensions of students’ interest for mathematics. Using survey data from 471 students in Grades 3–10 and 44 of their mathematics teachers, we find that students’ perceptions of their teachers’ enthusiasm for teaching mathematics positively predict their perceptions of a classroom mastery environment, which in turn predicts their interest. However, at the class-level, teachers’ enthusiasm for the subject of mathematics negatively predicts the emotional interest of their students. Implications of these results are discussed.

Keywords

Interest Teacher enthusiasm Classroom motivational environment Primary/elementary school Mathematics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Australian Office of the Chief Scientist (OCS). The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and project team and do not necessarily reflect the view of the OCS. The involvement and contributions of A/Prof. Judy Anderson, Prof. Kim Beswick, A/Prof. Vince Geiger, Prof. Merrilyn Goos, Dr. Derek Hurrel, Dr. Christopher Hurst, and Dr. Tracey Muir are acknowledged.

References

  1. ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). (2013). Guide to understanding 2013 Index of Community Socio-educational Advantage (ICSEA) values. Sydney: ACARA. http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Guide_to_understanding_2013_ICSEA_values.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
  2. Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderman, E. M., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Roeser, R., Wigfield, A., & Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83(5), 762–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity (McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology). New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beswick, K. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beswick, K., Ashman, D., Callingham, R., & McBain, D. (2011). Teachers’ and pre-service teachers’ confidence to teach primary school mathematics. In J. Wright (Ed.), Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. http://www.aare.edu.au/11pap/papers_pdf/aarefinal00535.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
  10. Beswick, K., Watson, J. M., & Brown, N. (2006). Teachers’ confidence and beliefs and their students’ attitudes to mathematics. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnapan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces. Proceedings of the 29th conference of the mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 68–75). Adelaide: MERGA.Google Scholar
  11. Burton, L. (2004). “Confidence is everything”. Perspectives of teachers and students on learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(4), 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler, R. (2007). Teachers’ achievement goal orientations and associations with teachers’ help seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Carmichael, C. S., Callingham, R., Hay, I., & Watson, J. M. (2010). Measuring middle school students’ interest in statistical literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(3), 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carmichael, C. S., Callingham, R., Watson, J. M., & Hay, I. (2009). Factors influencing the development of middle school students’ interest in statistical literacy. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 62–81.Google Scholar
  16. Chinnappan, M., Dinham, S., Herrington, A. J., & Scott, D. (2008). Year 12 students and higher mathematics: Emerging issues. In P. Jeffery (Ed.), Proceedings of AARE 2007 International Educational Research Conference (p. 10). Fremantle: Australian Association for Research in Education.Google Scholar
  17. Crouzevialle, M., & Butera, F. (2013). Performance-approach goals deplete working memory and impair cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 666–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1910). Interest in relation to training of the will. In J. J. Findlay (Ed.), Educational essays (pp. 73–132). Bath: Cedric Chivers Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development (Vol. 4, pp. 643–691). NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education (Vol. 3, pp. 139–186). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1990). Changes in academic motivation and self-perception during early adolescence. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Advances in adolescent development: From childhood to adolescence (Vol. 2, pp. 134–155). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frenzel, A. C., Dicke, A., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2012). Beyond quantitative decline: Conceptual shifts in adolescents’ development of interest in mathematics. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1069–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hattie, J.A.C. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Heinze, A., Reiss, K., & Franzizka, R. (2005). Mathematics achievement and interest in mathematics from a differential perspective. ZDM, 37(3), 212–220.Google Scholar
  32. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty (pp. 201–228). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46.Google Scholar
  38. Krapp, A. (2007). An educational-psychological conceptualisation of interest. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 298–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kunter, M., Tsai, Y., Klusmann, U., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2008). Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 468–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lazarides, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2015). Girls’ and boys’ perceived mathematics teacher beliefs, classroom learning environments and mathematical career intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lowry, N., & Johnson, D. W. (1981). Effects of controversy on epistemic curiosity, achievement, and attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 115(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(3), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  46. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2010). Beyond multilevel regression modeling: Multilevel analysis in a general latent variable framework. In J. Hox & J. K. Roberts (Eds.), The handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 15–40). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  49. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  50. Nagy, G., Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2010). The development of students’ mathematics self-concept in relation to gender: Different countries, different trajectories? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 482–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. N. (2015). Students’ motivation in the mathematics classroom. Revealing causes and consequences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(Suppl 2), 385–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K. C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Perry, R. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reeve, J. (1989). The interest-enjoyment distinction in intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 13(2), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2015). Teacher interests, mastery goals, and self-efficacy as predictors of instructional practices and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42(1), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2014). Do multiple solutions matter? Prompting multiple solutions, interest, competence, and autonomy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 497–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Mũller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seidman, E., Allen, L., Aber, J. L., Mitchell, C., & Feinman, J. (1994). The impact of school transitions in early adolescence on the self-system and perceived social context of poor urban youth. Child Development, 65(2), 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Köller, O., Marsh, H. W., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 788–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Cripps-Clark, J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary–secondary school transition. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/openpathinscitechmathenginprimsecschtrans.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
  64. Updegraff, K. A., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., & O’Brien, K. M. (1996). Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses? Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th through 11th grade Australian students. Child Development, 75(5), 1556–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Watt, H. M. G., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: A comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1594–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weldon, P. R. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in Australian secondary schools. (policy insights; n.6). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).Google Scholar
  68. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., MacIver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 552–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang, Q. (2014). Assessing the effects of instructor enthusiasm on classroom engagement, learning goal orientation, and academic self-efficacy. Communication Teacher, 28(1), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Carmichael
    • 1
  • Rosemary Callingham
    • 2
  • Helen M. G. Watt
    • 3
  1. 1.Charles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia
  2. 2.University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations