# Inhibitory control in mathematical thinking, learning and problem solving: a survey

- 616 Downloads
- 5 Citations

## Abstract

Inhibitory control—the ability to ignore salient but unhelpful stimuli and responses—seems to be important for learning mathematics. For instance there is now robust evidence that performance on classic measures of inhibition, such as the Stroop Task, correlate with school-level mathematics achievement. At the same time, a great deal of theoretical work in mathematics education research seems to reference the notion of inhibitory control, albeit not always explicitly. Our goal in this survey paper is to review the notion of inhibition from three perspectives. First we review evidence for the importance of inhibitory control in general cognition. Second, we discuss the relationship between inhibition skills and mathematics performance. Finally, we discuss how inhibitory control fits into a number of well established theoretical frameworks used in the mathematics education literature.

## Keywords

Inhibitory Control Conceptual Change Negative Priming Mathematics Achievement Dual Process Theory## References

- Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive.
*The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,**49A*, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),
*Recent advances in learning and motivation*(Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Barkley, R. A. (1997). ADHD and the nature of self-control. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"?
*Cognition,**21*, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten.
*Child Development,**78*, 647–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008a). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years.
*Developmental Neuropsychology,**33*, 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008b). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years.
*Developmental Neuropsychology,**33*, 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001a). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory.
*Developmental Neuropsychology,**19*, 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001b). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching and working memory.
*Developmental Neuropsychology,**19*, 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition.
*Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,**42*, 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Campbell, J. I. D., & Thompson, V. A. T. (2012). Retrieval-induced forgetting of arithmetic facts.
*Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,**38*, 118–129.Google Scholar - Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Clement, J., Lockhead, J., & Monk, G. (1981). Translation difficulties in learning mathematics.
*American Mathematical Monthly,**88*, 286–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - D’Amico, A., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2009). Naming speed and effortful and automatic inhibition in children with arithmetic learning disabilities.
*Learning and Individual Differences,**19*, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - De Smedt, B., Noël, M.-P., Gilmore, C., & Ansari, D. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior.
*Trends in Neuroscience and Education,**2*, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dehaene, S. (1997).
*The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics*. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar - Espy, K. A., McDiarmid, M. M., Cwik, M. F., Stalets, M. M., Hamby, A., & Senn, T. E. (2004). The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children.
*Developmental Neuropsychology,**26*, 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Evans, J. St. B. T., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual process theory of reasoning.
*Thinking and Reasoning,**11*, 382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate.
*Perspectives on Psychological Science,**8*, 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fischbein, E. (1987).
*Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach*. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar - Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**38*, 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**28*, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Friso-van den Bos, I., van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Luit, J. E. H. (2013). Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysis.
*Educational Research Review,**10*, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fuchs, L. S., Geary, D. C., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Seethaler, P. M., et al. (2010). Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities?
*Developmental Psychology,**46*, 1731–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fuhs, M. W., & McNeil, N. M. (2013). ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: Contributions of inhibitory control.
*Developmental Science,**16*, 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gifford, S., & Rockcliffe, F. (2012). Mathematics difficulties: Does one approach fit all?
*Research in Mathematics Education,**14*, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gillard, E., Van Dooren, W., Schaeken, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Proportional reasoning as a heuristic-based process: Time pressure and dual-task considerations.
*Experimental Psychology,**56*, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gilmore, C., Attridge, N., Clayton, S., Cragg, L., Johnson, S., Marlow, N., et al. (2013). Individual differences in inhibitory control, not non-verbal number acuity, correlate with mathematics achievement.
*PLoS ONE,**8*, e67374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement.
*Nature,**455*, 665–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Halberda, J., & Odic, D. (2014). The precision and internal confidence of our approximate number thoughts. In D. C. Geary, D. B. Berch, & K. M. Koepke (Eds.),
*Evolutionary origins and early development of basic number processing*(pp. 305–333). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Hyde, D. C., Khanum, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2014). Brief non-symbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children.
*Cognition,**131*, 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Inglis, M., Attridge, N., Batchelor, S., & Gilmore, C. (2011). Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children.
*Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,**18*, 1222–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for understanding stereotype activation and application.
*Psychological Bulletin,**129*, 522–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - LeFevre, J. A., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S. L., Smith Chant, B. L., Bisanz, J., Kamawar, D., & Penner Wilger, M. (2010). Pathways to mathematics: Longitudinal predictors of performance.
*Child Development,**81*, 1753–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2006). The rationality debate: Application of cognitive psychology to mathematics education.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**62*, 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2009). Intuitive vs analytical thinking: Four perspectives.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**71*, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - MacLeod, C. M. (2007). The concept of inhibition in cognition. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.),
*Inhibition in cognition*(pp. 3–23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Merenluoto, K., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Number concept and conceptual change: towards a systemic model of the processes of change.
*Learning and Instruction,**14*, 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions.
*Current Directions in Psychological Science,**21*, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis.
*Cognitive Psychology,**41*(1), 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving.
*Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,**80*, 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change.
*Science Education,**66*, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shallice, T. and Burgess, P. W. (1991) Higher-order cognitive impairments and frontal lobe lesions in man. In: H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, and A. L. Benton (Eds.) Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction (pp. 125–138). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a triprocess theory? In: J. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.
*Journal of Experimental Psychology,**18*, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - St Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory.
*The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,**59*, 745–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000).
*How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules*. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar - Thompson, V. A., & Morsanyi, K. (2012). Analytic thinking: Do you feel like it?
*Mind and Society,**11*, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming with to be ignored objects.
*The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,**37A*, 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Stassens, N., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Solving subtraction problems by means of indirect addition.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning,**11*, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vamvakoussi, X., Christou, K. P., Mertens, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2011). What fills the gap between discrete and dense? Greek and Flemish students' understanding of density.
*Learning and Instruction,**21*, 676–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vamvakoussi, X., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). Educated adults are still affected by intuitive beliefs about the effect of arithmetical operations: Evidence from a reaction-time study.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**82*, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010) How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation.
*Cognition & Instruction,**28*, 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010). Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: A conceptual change approach.
*Learning and Instruction,**14*, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change.
*Learning and Instruction,**4*, 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vosniadou, S. (2013). Conceptual change in learning and instruction: The framework theory approach. In: S. Vosniadou, ed. International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. (pp. 11–30, 2nd ed.). New York, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.). International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vosniadou, S., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching.
*Learning and Instruction,**14*, 445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wood, J., Mathews, A., & Dalgleish, T. (2001). Anxiety and cognitive inhibition.
*Emotion,**1*, 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar