Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 653–663 | Cite as

Moving beyond basic numeracy: data modeling in the early years of schooling

  • Joanne Mulligan
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Recent research has shown that young children are capable of engaging in data modeling and making informed judgments, an aspect of the mathematics curriculum not previously considered integral to early numeracy. In an Australian study, a sample of 21 highly able Grade 1 students was engaged in a series of investigations where they developed their own ways of representing data they had collected themselves. Students made impressive progress in 1 year, partly as a result of students’ repeated critical reflection and refinement of their graphical representations, which enhanced a wide range of meta-representational competencies. The five structures inherent in the Awareness of Mathematical Pattern and Structure model supported the interpretation of their development of statistical concepts. The study indicates that student-led data modeling with an emphasis on pattern and structure can contribute to critical numeracy and enhance the early development of statistical concepts.

Keywords

Alignment Structure Critical Numeracy Equal Spacing Australian Curriculum Representational Competence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research project was funded by a 3-year Australian Research Council Discovery Grant Transforming children’s mathematical and scientific development: A longitudinal study (No. DP110103586). The author expresses her particular thanks to colleagues Michael Mitchelmore, Lyn English and Kerry Hodge, research assistants Susannah Hudson and Jordana Reid, and the teachers and school community that made this study possible.

References

  1. Australian Council for Educational Research [ACER] (2013). Progressive Achievement Tests in Mathematics (PAT Maths) (Third Ed.). Camberwell, Victoria: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA] (2014). The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/.
  3. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behavior. In H. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence: reconceptualization and measurement (pp. 57–76). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: the learning trajectories approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2012). Standards for Mathematical Practice. Retrieved April 11, 2014 from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice.
  6. diSessa, A. A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: meta-representational expertise in children. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117–160.Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Bloomington: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  8. English, L. D. (2010). Young children’s early modeling with data. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. English, L. D. (2012). Data modeling with first-grade students. Educational Studies in Mathematics Education, 81, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. English, L. D. (2013). Reconceptualizing statistical learning in the early years. In L. D. English & J. T. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 67–82). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goos, M. (2007, September). Developing numeracy in the learning areas (middle years). Keynote address delivered at the South Australian Literacy and Numeracy Expo, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Langrall, C. W., Mooney, E. S., Perry, B., & Putt, I. J. (2000). A framework for characterising children’s statistical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 269–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Lehrer, R., & Romberg, T. (1996). Exploring children’s data modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 69–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, D. (2005). Developing modeling and argument in elementary grades. In T. Romberg, T. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 29–53). NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In R. Lesh & A. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 665–708). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Makar, K., Bakker, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). The reasoning behind informal statistical inference. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 152–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2012). Primary mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
  19. Ministry of Education, New Zealand. (2009). The New Zealand Curriculum: Mathematics Standards. Auckland NZ: Author.Google Scholar
  20. Mulligan, J. T., English, L. D., Mitchelmore, M. C., & Crevensten, N. (2013). Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning: the fundamental role of pattern and structure. In L. D. English & J. T. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 47–66). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (in press). Pattern and structure mathematics awareness program. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  23. OECD (2012). Education at a glance 2012 (Report OECD). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. Glossary: http://www.oecd.org/edu/EAG%20Glossary.pdf.
  24. Pfannkuch, K. (2011). The role of context in developing informal statistical inferential reasoning: a classroom study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: a framework of representational construction affordances. Journal of Science Education, 34, 2751–2773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raven, J. (2004). Coloured progressive matrices and Crichton vocabulary scale—manual. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  27. Van Oers, B. (2013). Communicating about number: fostering young children’s mathematical orientation in the world. In L. D. English & J. T. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 183–203). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: growth and goals. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Watson, J. (2011). Statistical literacy: connectivity for the Australian curriculum. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 16(3), 18–19.Google Scholar
  30. Watson, J., & English, L. (2014). Development of fourth grade students’ understanding of experimental and theoretical probability. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 215–222). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar
  31. Watson, J., & Fitzallen, N. (2010). The development of graph understanding in the mathematics curriculum: report for the New South Wales Department of Education and Training. Sydney: NSW Department of Education & Training.Google Scholar
  32. Watson, J., & Neal, D. (2012). Preparing students for decision-making in the 21st century: statistics and probability in the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgenson, & D. Siemon (Eds.), Engaging the Australian national curriculum mathematics: perspectives from the field (pp. 89–113). Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options