Accumulation of experience in a vast number of cases: enactivism as a fit framework for the study of spatial reasoning in mathematics education
- 603 Downloads
As we witness a push toward studying spatial reasoning as a principal component of mathematical competency and instruction in the twenty first century, we argue that enactivism, with its strong and explicit foci on the coupling of organism and environment, action as cognition, and sensory motor coordination provides an inclusive, expansive, apt, and fit framework. We illustrate the fit of enactivism as a theory of learning with data from an ongoing research project involving teachers and elementary-aged children’s engagement in the design and assembly of motorized robots. We offer that spatial reasoning with its considerations of physical context, the dynamics of a body moving through space, sensorimotor coordination, and cognition, appears different from other conceptual competencies in mathematics. Specifically, we argue that learner engagements with diverse types of informationally ‘dense’ visuo-spatial interfaces (e.g., blueprints, programming icons, blocks, maps), as in the research study, afford some of the necessary experiences with/in a vast number of cases described by Varela et al. (1991) that enable the development of other mathematical competencies.
KeywordsEnactivism Sensorimotor coordination Spatial reasoning Robotics
- Barnett, T. (2013). What is spatial ability? wiseGEEK. Retrieved September 26, 2013, from http://www.wisegeek.org/what-is-spatial-ability.htm.
- Begg, A. (2013). Interpreting enactivism for learning and teaching. Education Sciences and Society, 4(1). Retrieved January 15, 2014 from http://riviste.unimc.it/index.php/es_s/article/view/699.
- Bergen, B. (2012). Louder than Words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Bruce, C. D., Moss, J., Sinclair, N., Whiteley, W., Okamoto, Y., McGarvey, L., et al. (2013). Early years spatial reasoning: Learning, teaching and research implications. Workshop Presented at the NCTM research presession: Linking research and practice, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
- Carlson, A. G., Rowe, E., & Curby, T. W. (2013). Disentangling fine motor skills’ relations to academic achievement: the relative contributions of visual–spatial integration and visual–motor coordination. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174(5), 514–533. doi:10.1080/00221325.2012.717122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Casey, B., Erkut, S., Ceder, I., & Young, J. (2008). Use of a storytelling context to improve girls’ and boys’ geometry skills in kindergarten. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 29–48.Google Scholar
- Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: toward a sound alternative. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
- Di Jaegher, H., & Di Paulo, E. (2013). Enactivism is not interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(345), 1–2. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00345.
- Ernest, P. (2006). Reflections on theories of learning. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
- Gojak, L. (2012). Helping our students become mathematical thinkers. Presidential Address presented at the NCTM 2012 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from http://www.nctm.org/conferences/content.aspx?id=33201.
- Hutto, D. D. (2013). Psychology unified: from folk psychology to radical enactivism. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 174–178. doi:10.1037/a0032930.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.Google Scholar
- Kayhan, E. B. (2005). Investigation of high school students’ spatial ability. Middle East Technical University, Turkey. Retrieved September 25, 2013, from https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12605771/index.pdf.
- Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Maheux, J. F., & Proulx, J. (2015). Doing|mathematics: Analysing data with/in an enactivist-inspired approach. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(2).Google Scholar
- Mgombelo, J., & Reid, D. A. (2015). Key concepts in enactivist theory and methodology. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(2).Google Scholar
- Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29–35.Google Scholar
- Sparks, S. D. (2013). Children’s spatial skills seen as key to math learning. Education Week, 32(31). Retrieved January 8, 2014, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/05/15/31learning.h32.html.
- Tepylo, D. (2013). Spatial reasoning: considerations for mathematics educators. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
- Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar