Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 45, Issue 7, pp 1003–1016 | Cite as

Collective work with resources: an essential dimension for teacher documentation

  • G. GueudetEmail author
  • B. Pepin
  • L. Trouche
Original Article

Abstract

In this paper we study the collective dimensions of teachers’ work in their ordinary daily practice. We argue that teachers’ ordinary work comprises many collaborative aspects, and that the interactions with colleagues, often through resources, are crucial for teacher professional development. Using a theoretical framework based on teacher documentation work, we focused on interactions between teachers and resources to study two teachers’ work: one teacher in France and one teacher in Norway. For both teachers we identified collective dimensions in their work with resources. Contrasting these two cases enabled us to identify particular features, but also possible invariants, of teachers’ work with resources. Our results indicate that collective dimensions are always present in teachers’ work, but that true communities of practice, which could be considered as an achievement of collective teachers’ work, are scarce. We discuss the conditions for the emergence of such communities.

Keywords

Professional Development Teacher Education Mathematics Teacher Collective Work Lesson Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: what is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(6–8), 14.Google Scholar
  3. Borba, M. C., & Llinares, S. (2012). Online mathematics teacher education: overview of an emergent field of research. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44, 697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chesné, J., Coulange, L., Grapin, N., & Le Yaouanq, M. (2009). Hélice 6ème. Paris: Hatier.Google Scholar
  5. Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 4 (pp. 21–30). Barcelona: FUNDEMI IQS-Universitat Ramon Llull. http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/CERME4/index.php. Accessed 26 July 2013.
  6. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diekema, A. R., & Whitney Olsen, M. (2012). The notion of relevance in teacher information behavior. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: a Japanese approach to improving mathematics learning and teaching. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Fuglestad, A. B. (2007). Developing tasks and teaching with ICT in mathematics in an inquiry community. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 5 (pp. 1409–1418). Larnaca, Cyprus: University of Cyprus. http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/CERME5b. Accessed 26 July 2013.
  10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  11. Goos, M. (2012). Socio-cultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers: a zone theory approach. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012). From textbooks to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaworski, B. (2008). Building and sustaining inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teachers education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 309–330). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Krainer, K., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). Participants in mathematics teachers education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (Vol. 3). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Lyngved, R., Pepin, B., & Sikko, S. A. (2012). Inquiry based learning (IBL) environments: working with teachers on and mathematics and science tasks. In F. Rønning, R. Diesen, H. Hoveid, & I. Pareliussen (Eds.), FOU Praksis 2011 (pp. 275–286). Trondheim: Tapir AkademiskForlag.Google Scholar
  17. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sabra, H., & Trouche, L. (2011). Collective design of an online math textbook: when individual and collective documentation works meet. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME 7 (pp. 2356–2366). University of Rzesów. http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/doc/cerme7/CERME7.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2013.
  19. Vergnaud, G. (1998). Toward a cognitive theory of practice. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 227–241). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vickers, G. (1995). The art of judgement: The study of policy making. London: Sage Centenary Edition.Google Scholar
  21. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CREADUniversity of BrestBrestFrance
  2. 2.Sør-Trøndelag University CollegeTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.French Institute of EducationÉcole Normale Supérieure de LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations