Spatial visualizers, object visualizers and verbalizers: their mathematical creative abilities
This paper investigates the relationship between the creative process in mathematical tasks and spatial, object and verbal cognitive styles. A group of 96 prospective primary school teachers completed the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire and took a mathematical creativity test. The results of a multiple regression analysis demonstrated that whereas visual cognitive styles (spatial and object imagery) were statistically significant predictors of participants’ creative abilities in mathematics, verbal cognitive style did not predict these abilities. Further analysis of the data indicated that spatial imagery cognitive style was related to mathematical fluency, flexibility and originality. On the other hand, object imagery cognitive style was negatively related to mathematical originality and verbal cognitive style was negatively related to mathematical flexibility. The study also revealed that individuals with a tendency towards different cognitive styles employed different strategies in the creative mathematical tasks.
KeywordsSpatial visualizers Object visualizers Verbalizers Mathematical creativity
- Baggett, P., & Ehrenfeucht, A. (2008). Breaking away from the math book: Creative projects for K-12. http://sofia.nmsu.edu/~breakingaway/lessons.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2012.
- Balka, D. S. (1974). Creative ability in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 21(7), 633–636.Google Scholar
- Borromeo Ferri, R. (2003). Mathematical thinking styles—an empirical study. In M. A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the third conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Bellaria, Italy. http://www.dm.unipi.it/~didattica/CERME3/proceedings/Groups/TG3/TG3_BorromeoFerri_cerme3.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2012.
- Borromeo Ferri, R. (2012). Mathematical thinking styles and their influence on teaching and learning mathematics. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seoul, Korea. http://www.icme12.org/upload/submission/1905_F.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2012.
- Borromeo Ferri, R., & Kaiser, G. (2003). First results of a study on different mathematical thinking styles of school children. In L. Burton (Ed.), Which way social justice in mathematics education? (pp. 209–239). London: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Chabris, C. F., Jerde, T. E., Woolley, A. W., Gerbasi, M. E., Schuldt, J. P., Bennett, S. L., Hackman, J. R., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2006). Spatial and object visualization cognitive styles: Validation studies in 3800 individuals. Technical Report, Group Brain Project. http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~cfc/Chabris2006d.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2012.
- Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S., & Klavas, A. (1989). Survey of research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 50–58.Google Scholar
- Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
- Iowa Department of Education (1989). A guide to developing higher order thinking across the curriculum. Des Moines, IA: Department of Education. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED 306 550).Google Scholar
- Kirton, M. J. (Ed.). (1989). Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem solving. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kunzdorf, R. (1982). Mental images, appreciation of grammatical patterns, and creativity. Journal of Mental Imagery, 6, 183–202.Google Scholar
- Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (Eds.). (2009). Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). Seoul: PME.Google Scholar
- Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2009). Multiple solutions for a problem: A tool for evaluation of mathematical thinking in geometry. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of sixth conference of European Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 776–785). Lyon: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.Google Scholar
- Mann, E. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260.Google Scholar
- Martinsen, Ø., & Kaufmann, G. (1999). Cognitive style and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 273–282). USA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2001). Psychological testing: Principles and application (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Richardson, V. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of research teaching (4th ed.). Washington: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 36–40.Google Scholar
- Torrance, E. P. (1974). A manual for the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
- Torrance, E. P. (1998). The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms—technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Testing Service, Inc.Google Scholar