Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 717–731 | Cite as

Online paths in mathematics teacher training: new resources and new skills for teacher educators

  • Ghislaine GueudetEmail author
  • Ana Isabel Sacristán
  • Sophie Soury-Lavergne
  • Luc Trouche
Original Article

Abstract

This paper considers the work carried out by online teacher educators and their professional development. We use the theoretical perspective of the documentational approach that focuses, in this case, on the interaction between teacher educators and the resources they use for their online training work. We thus study the following issues: (1) What kinds of resources do online teacher educators need, and how are such resources modified according to the educators’ specific skills and needs? (2) What specific skills are needed for setting up online training for mathematics teachers and how do these skills evolve as teacher education resources are used? We consider both questions simultaneously, while presenting results from a study within a specific teacher training programme in France that proposes “training paths” on a national platform. These “paths” are resources designed for teacher educators. We follow the appropriation of two training paths by two educator teams. The ways in which these educator teams were able to appropriate the paths give insights into the teacher educators’ skills and, as well, into the resources they need. By looking at their use of resources (as online mathematics teacher educators), we observe and analyse professional geneses, leading to the development of new skills.

Keywords

Documentational approach Dynamic geometry Individualisation Investigation Mathematics teacher education Online resources Online teacher education Teacher educators’ professional knowledge Training path 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors warmly thank Lulu Healy for her help with the English language revisions of this paper.

References

  1. Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, R., Wallace, M., Cederberg, J., & Pearson, D. (1996). Teachers empowering teachers: vertically-integrated, inquiry-based geometry in school classrooms. Mathematics Teacher, 90(3), 254–255.Google Scholar
  3. Alsawaie, O. N., & Alghazo, I. M. (2010). Enhancing mathematics beliefs and teaching efficacy of prospective teachers through an online video club. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 8(1), 44–56.Google Scholar
  4. Artigue, M. (1998). Teacher training as a key issue for the integration of computer technologies. In J. D. Tinsley & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Information and communication in school mathematics (pp. 121–129). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Baran, B., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). The dynamics of online communities in the activity theory framework. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 155–166.Google Scholar
  6. Borba, M. C., & Amaral, R. B. (2011). A model to teach teachers to become online teachers. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 262). Ankara: PME.Google Scholar
  7. Borba, M. C., & Gadanidis, G. (2008). Virtual communities and networks of practising mathematics teachers. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teachers education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (Vol. 3, pp. 181–206). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among pre-service elementary teachers: seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. García, M., Sánchez, V., Escudero, I., & Llinares, S. (2006). The dialectic relationship between theory and practice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goos, M. E., & Bennison, A. (2008). Developing a communal identity as beginning teachers of mathematics: emergence of an online community of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(1), 41–60. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9061-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2012). From textbooks to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher documentation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9159-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2011). Mathematics teacher education advanced methods: an example in dynamic geometry. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(3), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: the case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3, 195–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaworski, B. (2008). Building and sustaining inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In K. Krainer & T. Woods (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teachers education (Vol. 3, pp. 309–330). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Krainer, K., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). Participants in mathematics teachers education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (Vol. 3). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 429–459). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Llinares, S., & Olivero, F. (2008). Virtual communities and networks of prospective mathematics teachers. Technologies, interactions, and new forms of discourse. In K. Krainer & T. Woods (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teachers education (Vol. 3, pp. 155–179). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2009). The building of pre-service primary teachers’ knowledge of mathematics teaching: interaction and online video case studies. Instructional Science, 37(3), 247–271. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9043-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers’ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 177–196. doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9133-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGraw, R., Lynch, K., Koc, Y., Budak, A., & Brown, C. A. (2007). The multimedia case as a tool for professional development: an analysis of online and face-to-face interaction among mathematics pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, mathematicians, and mathematics teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 95–121. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9030-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J., & Bateman, S. (2009). Teachers’ use of online mathematics education resources: insights on digital natives and proficient digital immigrants. In Swars, S. L., Stinson, D. W., & Lemons-Smith, S. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 1505–1512). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  23. Orleans, A. V. (2010). Enhancing teacher competence through online training. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 371–386.Google Scholar
  24. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.Google Scholar
  25. Parada, S. E., Sacristán, A. I., Pluvinage, F. (2012). Primeras reflexiones sobre la actividad matemática promovida en el aula al interior de comunidades de práctica. In A. Oktaç, Y. Chavez, O. Covian, J. M. Lopez, M. E. Méndez (Eds.), Memorias del Primer Coloquio de Doctorado del Departamento de Matemática Educativa (pp. 127–138). México D.F.: Cinvestav—IPNGoogle Scholar
  26. Remillard, J. T. (2012). Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From textbooks to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher documentation (pp. 105–122). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Salaün, J.-M. (2011). Immeasurable library economics. In I. Rizzo & A. Mignosa (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of cultural heritage. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Sanchez, M. (2010). Orquestración documentacional: herramienta para la estructuración y el análisis del trabajo documentacional colectivo en linea. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 30(3), 367–397.Google Scholar
  29. Santos, L., & da Ponte, J. P. (2003). An experience in distance in-service teacher education. In Proceedings of CERME3 (3rd conference of the European society for research in mathematics education). http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME3/tableofcontents_cerme3.html. Accessed 18 Apr 2012.
  30. Trouche, L., & Guin, D. (2005). Distance training, a key mode to support teachers in the integration of ICT? In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth European conference on research on mathematics education (pp. 1020–1029). FUNDEMI IQS—Universitat Ramon Llull http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME4/CERME4_WG9.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2012.
  31. Trouche, L., Drijvers, P., Gueudet, G., & Sacristan, A. I. (2012). Technology-driven developments and policy implications for mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Springer (in press).Google Scholar
  32. Vygotski, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ghislaine Gueudet
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Isabel Sacristán
    • 2
  • Sophie Soury-Lavergne
    • 3
  • Luc Trouche
    • 3
  1. 1.CREAD, IUFM Bretagne UBORennes CedexFrance
  2. 2.Departamento de Matemática EducativaCinvestav, IPNMexicoMexico
  3. 3.EducTice-S2HEPInstitut Français de l’Education (ENS Lyon)Lyon Cedex 07France

Personalised recommendations