Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 43, Issue 6–7, pp 861–873 | Cite as

Developing expertise: how enactivism re-frames mathematics teacher development

  • Laurinda Brown
  • Alf ColesEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

In this article, we present a re-framing of teacher development that derives from our convictions regarding the enactive approach to cognition and the biological basis of being. We firstly set out our enactivist stance and then distinguish our approach to teacher development from others in the mathematics education literature. We show how a way of working that develops expertise runs through all mathematics education courses at the University of Bristol, and distil key principles for running collaborative groups of teachers. We exemplify these principles further through analysis of one group that met over 2 years as part of a research project focused on the work of Gattegno. We provide evidence for the effectiveness of the group in terms of teacher development. We conclude by arguing that the way of working in this group cannot be separated from the history of interaction of participants.

Keywords

Mathematics teacher development Awareness Purposes Collaborative group Enactivism Expertise 

References

  1. Belenky, M., Clichy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1997). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, L. (2005). Purposes, metacommenting and basic-level categories: Parallels between teaching mathematics and learning to teach mathematics. Paper presented at the 15th ICMI Study Conference. From http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/log_in.html.
  3. Brown, L., & Coles, A. (2000). Complex decision making in the classroom: The teacher as an intuitive practitioner. In T. Atkinson & G. Claxton (Eds.), The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing (pp. 165–181). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, L., & Coles, A. (2010). Mathematics teacher and mathematics teacher educator change—Insight through theoretical perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, L., & Reid, D. (2006). Embodied cognition: Somatic markers, purposes and emotional orientations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, L., Hewitt, D., & Tahta, D. (1989). A Gattegno Anthology. Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  7. Damasio, A. (1996). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, B., Brown, L., Cedillo, T., Chiocca, C.-M., Dawson, S., Gimenez, J., et al. (2009). Development of teaching in and from practice. In R. Even & D. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI study. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gattegno, C. (1971). What we owe children: The subordination of teaching to learning. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Gattegno, C. (1987). The science of education. Part 1: Theoretical considerations. Reading: Education Solutions.Google Scholar
  12. Hewitt, D. (1999). Arbitrary and necessary. Part 1: A way of viewing the mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 2–9.Google Scholar
  13. Hodgen, J. (2005). Motivation, desire and teacher change in primary mathematics. Paper presented at The 15th ICMI Study Conference. From http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/log_in.html.
  14. Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2009). Pursuing excellence in mathematics classroom instruction through exemplary lesson development in China: A case study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huberman, M. (1999). The mind is its own place: The influence of sustained interactivity with practitioners on educational researchers. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 289–319.Google Scholar
  16. Jaworski, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and learning development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnership. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 249–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Juarrero, A. (2002). Dynamics in action: Intentional behaviour as a complex system. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Maturana, H. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 25–88.Google Scholar
  19. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambala.Google Scholar
  20. Raymond, A., & Leinenbach, M. (2000). Collaborative action research on the learning and teaching of algebra: A story of one mathematics teacher’s development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. St. Julien, J. (1997). Explaining learning: The research trajectory of situated cognition and the implications of connectionism. In D. Kirshner & J. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives (pp. 261–279). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Stewart, J. (2011). Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: From the origins of life to consciousness and writing. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 1–88). Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stroh Becvar, D., & Becvar, R. (2000). Family therapy: A systemic integration. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  24. Varela, F. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  27. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of education research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13–22.Google Scholar
  28. White, A., & Lim, C. (2008). Lesson study in Asia Pacific classrooms: Local responses to a global movement. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 915–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BristolUK

Personalised recommendations