Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 353–358 | Cite as

Re-use? Is this re-use?

Revisiting an objective of the Intergeo project
  • Paul Libbrecht
Original Article
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

An initiative such as the Intergeo project has the clear mission to allow many teachers to gain easy access to resources that can support their teaching practice when using them. Re-use then appears when the sole usage is insufficient and needs adaptations to the specific context. This paper investigates the common practices of re-use in computer science literature, describes how it was implemented in the i2geo platform, and how the actual usage of the platform shows that the definition we first envisioned and that is widespread is short sighted. Following the observations of the practices, generalizations of the notion of re-use are proposed.

Keywords

Re-use Adaptations Usage Teacher resources Computer supported learning Intergeo Dynamic geometry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by funding from the EU for the project Intergeo (ECP-2006-EDU-410016) and the institutions of the author (DFKI gGmbH and CERMAT). The author wishes to thank all the users of the i2geo platform, who have patiently provided feedback and repeatedly attempted workflows.

References

  1. Bourgeat, F., Calpe, A., Digeon, M., Esfahani, E., Leyraud, I., Soury-Lavergne, S., Thomas, R., Touraille, O., & Trgalová, J. (2010). Working on resources quality assessment on i2geo. In Proceedings of I2GEO conference 2010. http://cermat.org/i2geo2010/.
  2. Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2003). Knowledge communication in design communities. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 1–32). Kluwer, Dordrecht. http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers.html.
  3. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2011). From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. Springer, Berlin (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentary systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9159-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hendriks, M., Libbrecht, P., Creus-Mir, A., & Dietrich, M. (2008). Deliverable d2.4: Metadata specification. Deliverable 2.4, Intergeo Project. http://www.inter2geo.eu/files/D2.4-Metadata-Spec.pdf.
  6. Kortenkamp, U., Blessing, A., et al. (2009). Interoperable Interactive Geometry for Europe—first technological and educational results and future challenges of the Intergeo project. In V. Durrand-Guerrier, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth CERME conference, 2009. http://www.inrp.fr/publications/edition-electronique/cerme6/wg7-11-kortenkamp.pdf.
  7. Lehmann, L., Rensing, C., & Steinmetz, R. (2008): Capture of lifecycle information to support personal information management. In: P. Dillenbourg, M. Specht (Eds.), Times of convergence: Technologies across learning contexts, third european conference on technology enhanced learning, EC-TEL 2008 (pp. 216–221). Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-540-876-04-5.Google Scholar
  8. Libbrecht, P., Kortenkamp, U., & Mercat, C. (2009). I2Geo: A web-library of interactive geometry. In Proceedings of the workshop on digital mathematics libraries 2009. http://i2geo.net/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Proceedings.
  9. Lokar, M. (1998). DERIVE v slovenskih srednjih šolah. Analiza anket, Zavod za šolstvo.Google Scholar
  10. Mercat, C., Hasek, R., Leistenschneider, M., Pech, P., Recio, T., Soury-Lavergne, S., & Trgalová, J. (2009) Report on best practises for DGS content. Deliverable D6.2, Intergeo Consortium, November 2009. http://i2geo.net/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Publication.
  11. Nelson, T. (1999). Transpublishing: A simple concept. http://xanadu.com.au/ted/TPUB/TPUBsum.html. Accessed 18 Sept 2010.
  12. Petrides, L., Nguyen, L., Kargliani, A., & Jimes, C. (2008). Open educational resources: Inquiring into author reuse behaviors. In M. Specht & P. Dillenbourg (Eds.) Proceedings of ECTEL 2008, Maastricht. LNCS (Vol. 5192, pp. 344–353). Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  13. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers & Education, 51(1), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Trgalová, J., Jahn, A.-P., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (2011). Quality assessment process for dynamic geometry resources in Intergeo project (in this volume).Google Scholar
  16. Wiley, D. A. (2001) Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects (pp. 1–35). Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 2001. http://reusability.org/.

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Educational Research in Mathematics and TechnologyPädagogische Hochschule KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations