ZDM

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 587–599 | Cite as

Beliefs and beyond: hows and whys in the teaching of proof

Original Article

Abstract

In this paper, we report on a study aimed at describing the way secondary school teachers treat proof and at understanding which factors may influence such a treatment. This study is part of a wider project on proof carried out for many years. In our theoretical framework, we combine references from research on proof with those from research on teachers in relation to their beliefs. The study was carried out through interviews with secondary school teachers aimed at learning how they describe their work with proof in the classroom, and to elicit beliefs and other factors that shape this work. Through the interviews we were able to detect reasons behind teachers’ choices in planning their work in the classroom. In the present paper, we concentrate on four cases that, among other factors, offer elements suitable to unravel the problem of inconsistencies using the construct of leading beliefs, i.e., beliefs (whose nature may vary from teacher to teacher) that seem to drive the way each teacher treats proof.

References

  1. Ball, D., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002). The teaching of proof. Paper presented at the International Congress of Mathematicians, Beijing, China. In L. Tatsien (Ed.), Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians (Vol. 3, pp. 907–920). Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. (1998). Exploring mathematical beliefs—the naturalistic approach. In M. Ahtee & E. Pehkonen (Eds.), Research methods in mathematics and science education (pp. 25–40). Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Department of Teacher Education. Research Report 185.Google Scholar
  3. Boero, P., Douek, N., Morselli, F., & Pedemonte, B. (2010). Research forum 2. Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation, with a reaction by L. Camargo, P. Perry, & C. Samper. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. E. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of PME 34 (Vol. 1, pp. 179–209). Belo Horizonte: PME.Google Scholar
  4. Castelnuovo, G. (1911). La rigueur dans l’enseignement mathématique dans les écoles moyennes. L’Enseignement Mathématique, 13, 461–464.Google Scholar
  5. Cicognani, E. (2002). Psicologia sociale e ricerca qualitativa [Social psychology and qualitative research]. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
  6. De Villiers, M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 7–24.Google Scholar
  7. Dionne, J. (1984). The perception of mathematics among elementary school teachers. In J. Moser (Ed.), Proceedings PME-NA 6 (pp. 223–228). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  8. Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  9. Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In A. Bishop, P. Damerow, C. Keitel, & P. Gerdes (Eds.), Mathematics, education and society (pp. 99–101). Paris: Unesco, Documents series 3.Google Scholar
  10. Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Leading beliefs in the teaching of proof. In W. Shloeglmann & J. Maasz (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education. New research results (pp. 59–74). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Handal, B. (2003). Teachers’ mathematical beliefs: A review. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 47–57.Google Scholar
  13. Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanna, G., & Barbeau, E. (2008). Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge. ZDM, 40, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanna, G., & De Villiers, M. (2008). ICMI Study 19. Proof and proving in mathematics education. ZDM, 40, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herbst, P., & Miyakawa, T. (2008). When, how, and why prove theorems? A methodology for studying the perspective of geometry teachers. ZDM, 40, 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoyles, C. (1992). Mathematics teaching and mathematics teachers: A meta-case study. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 32–44.Google Scholar
  18. Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhs, T. M., & Ball, D. L. (1986). Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains of knowledge, skills, and dispositions (Research Memo). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Center on Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  20. Leatham, K. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin, F.-L., Hsieh, F.-J., Hanna, G., & de Villiers, M. (Eds.) (2009). Proof and proving in mathematics education. ICMI Study 19 conference proceedings. Taipei: The Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nathan, M., & Knuth, E. (2003). The study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition & Instruction, 21(2), 175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 550–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roesken, B., & Toerner, G. (2010). The (unsolved) problem how world views and beliefs correlate with educational practices—some implicit ‘messages’ to the MAVI-world. Oral presentation at the MAVI-16 conference, Tallinn, 26–29 June 2010.Google Scholar
  27. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(6), 641–649.Google Scholar
  29. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). How can we examine the connections between teachers’ world views and their educational practices? Issues in Education, 8(2), 217–227.Google Scholar
  30. Sfard, A. (2008). Introduction to Thinking as communicating. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 5, 429–436.Google Scholar
  31. Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–27.Google Scholar
  33. Skott, J. (2009). Contextualising the notion of ‘belief enactment’. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Speer, N. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thompson, A. G. (1984). Teachers’ conception of mathematics and mathematics teaching on instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toerner, G. (1998). Self-estimating teachers’ views on mathematics teaching—modifying Dionne’s approach. In J. A. Dossey, J. O. Swafford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings PME-NA (Vol. 2, pp. 627-634). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  38. Weber, K. (2005). Problem-solving, proving, and learning: The relationship between problem-solving processes and learning opportunities in the activity of proof construction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, M. S., & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127–147). The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  40. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zammuner, V. L. (1998). Tecniche dell’intervista e del questionario [Interview and questionnaire techniques]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Matematica dell’Università di GenovaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations