Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 307–315 | Cite as

Beyond realistic considerations: modeling conceptions and controls in task examples with simple word problems

  • Irit Peled
  • Nicolas Balacheff
Original Article

Abstract

Using simple word problems, we analyze possible teacher conceptions on the process of problem solving, its goals and the choices that a problem solver can make in problem mathematization. We identify several possible teacher conceptions that would be responsible for the different didactical contracts that teachers create in the mathematics class. Using especially chosen and designed task examples, we demonstrate the diagnosis of teacher own controls in solving problems and in evaluating problem solutions. We also discuss characteristics of task examples that might promote a shift from a problem solving perspective to a modeling perspective that goes beyond merely accepting alternative solutions due to realistic considerations. This shift in perspective would be exhibited through a new understanding of the process of fitting mathematical models in problem situations.

Keywords

Modeling Problem solving Teacher conceptions Examples Didactical contract Control 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Israeli Science Foundation (59/06).

References

  1. Balacheff, N. (2010). Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics: A didactical perspective. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, & H. Pulte (Eds.), Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives (pp. 115–136). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum, V., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects—State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. DeFranco, T. C., & Curcio, F. R. (1997). A division problem with a remainder embedded across two contexts: Children’s solutions in restrictive versus real-word settings. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19(2), 58–72.Google Scholar
  5. Doerr, H. M., & English, L. D. (2006). Middle grade teachers’ learning through students’ engagement with modeling tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duval R. (1988). Ecarts sémantiques et coherence mathématiques: introduction aux problèmes de congruences. Annales de didactique et de sciencse cognitives (IREM de Strasbourg), 1, 7–23.Google Scholar
  7. Ikeda, T., & Kaiser, G. (2005). The role and the relevance of applications and modelling in Japan and Germany—A comparative study. In Proceedings of the Third International ICMI East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education, Shanghai, August 7–12.Google Scholar
  8. IREM de Grenoble. (1980). Quel est l’âge du capitaine. Bulletin de l’APMEP, 59(323), 235–243.Google Scholar
  9. Kaiser, G. (2006). The mathematical beliefs of teachers about applications and modelling—Results of an empirical study. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 393–400). Google Scholar
  10. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of a models and modelling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: A model and modelling perspective on teaching, learning, and problem solving in mathematics education (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591–645). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Nesher, P. (1980). The stereotyped nature of school word problems. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(1), 41–48.Google Scholar
  13. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  14. Peled, I. (2010). (Fish) food for thought: Authority shifts in the interaction between mathematics and reality. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 108–120.Google Scholar
  15. Peled, I., & Bassan-Cincinatus, R. (2005). Degrees of freedom in modeling: Taking certainty out of proportion. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 57–64).Google Scholar
  16. Peled, I., & Hershkovitz, S. (2004). Evolving research of mathematics teacher educators: The case of non-standard issues in solving standard problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(4), 299–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reusser, K., & Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution—The social rationality of mathematical modeling in schools. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching realistic mathematical modeling and problem solving in the elementary school: A teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Borghart, L. (1997). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions and beliefs about the role of real-world knowledge in mathematical modeling of school word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modelling of school word problems. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modelling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 257–276). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., Greer, B., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010). Reconceptualising word problems as exercises in mathematical modeling. Journal fur Mathematik Didaktik (ZDM), 31, 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Informatique de GrenobleCNRSGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations