Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 42, Issue 3–4, pp 381–392 | Cite as

Mobilizing histories in mathematics teacher education: memories, social practices, and discursive games

  • Antonio MiguelEmail author
  • Iran Abreu Mendes
Original Article
  • 265 Downloads

Abstract

In the first part of this paper, we share and elucidate the way we mobilize histories in some disciplines that are part of the undergraduate courses in mathematics teacher education offered by State University of Campinas and Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte in Brazil. This way of mobilization can be featured as a set of collective indisciplinary problematizations occurring in a series of student investigations. Mobilizing practices of mathematics culture are the object of these investigations. These practices are performed by different communities both constituted by and constituent of different human activities. In the second part of this paper, we will discuss our way of mobilizing histories, contrasting it with the theoretical perspective of expansive learning, just as it has been defended by Yrjö Engeström, in his article Non scolae sed vitae discimus—towards overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. We will also attempt to highlight the role which this researcher has attributed to history in his model of expansive learning, a perspective based on the current research on activity theory.

Keywords

Mathematics teacher education Histories Social practices Discursive memory games Indisciplinary problematization 

References

  1. Burke, P. (2000). Variedades de história cultural. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
  2. Derrida, J. (2004). Gramatologia. São Paulo: Perspectiva.Google Scholar
  3. Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and instruction, 1, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fish, S. (1993). Como reconhecer um poema ao vê-lo. Palavra, 1, 156–166.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (2000). Microfísica do poder. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal Ltda.Google Scholar
  6. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lave, J. (1996). A selvageria da mente domesticada. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 46, 109–134.Google Scholar
  9. Miguel, A., & Miorim, M. A. (2005). História na Educação Matemática: propostas e desafios. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.Google Scholar
  10. Miguel, A., & Vilela, D. S. (2008). Práticas escolares de mobilização de cultura matemática. Cadernos CEDES, 28(74), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moita Lopes, L. P. (2006). Uma lingüística aplicada mestiça e ideológica: interrogando o campo como lingüista aplicado. In L. P. Moita Lopes (Ed.), Por uma Lingüística aplicada Indisciplinar (pp. 13–44). São Paulo: Parábola Editorial.Google Scholar
  12. Pennycook, A. (2006). Uma lingüística aplicada transgressiva. In L. P. Moita Lopes (Ed.), Por uma Lingüística aplicada INdisciplinar (pp. 67–84). São Paulo: Parábola Editorial.Google Scholar
  13. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and modern culture: Critical social theory in the era of Mass Communication. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  15. Walkerdine, V. (2004). Diferença, cognição e educação matemática. In G. Knijnik, F. Wanderer, & C. J. Oliveira (Eds.), Etnomatemática, Currículo e Formação de Professores. Santa Cruz do Sul: EDUNISC.Google Scholar
  16. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Wittgenstein, L. (2006). Philosophical investigations. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de EducaçãoUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteNatalBrazil

Personalised recommendations