ZDM

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 163–178 | Cite as

Aspects of pedagogy supporting metacognition and self-regulation in mathematical learning of young children: evidence from an observational study

Original Article
First Online:
Accepted:

Abstract

This article reports on evidence collected within a UK study concerning metacognition in young children in the 3–5-year age range within mathematical contexts. Young children were video-recorded on a number of occasions in the naturalistic context of their Foundation Stage settings and classrooms, including both nursery and reception classes. The children were engaged in mathematical activities designed by practitioners to facilitate metacognitive processes. Metacognitive ‘events’ were identified and the children’s behaviour was analysed for indications of metacognitive thinking. At the same time, the pedagogical context of the activities, including interventions by adult practitioners, was analysed in relation to the metacognitive opportunities afforded. Findings were that the young children did indeed show evidence, through their talk, and their non-verbal actions, of emergent metacognitive processes, and that the nature and frequency of these processes were influenced by pedagogical aspects of the mathematical activities. In particular, pedagogical interactions which provided children in this age range with emotionally contingent support, which gave them feelings of autonomy and control, which provided them with cognitive challenges and the opportunity to articulate their thinking appeared to provoke and support metacognitive and self-regulatory behaviours.

Keywords

Mathematical Activity Metacognitive Knowledge Metacognitive Skill Metacognitive Process Cognitive Challenge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alexander, R. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.Google Scholar
  2. Anghileri, J. (2000). Teaching number sense. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  3. Annevirta, T., & Vauras, M. (2001). Metacognitive knowledge in primary grades: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blöte, A. W., Resing, W. C. M., Mazer, P., & Van Noort, D. A. (1999). Young children’s organizational strategies on a same–different task: A microgenetic study and a training study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today? International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, M. (2009). The importance of metacognition for conceptual change and strategy use in mathematics. In H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, & instruction (pp. 176–197). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, E. V. (1978). Strategies for communication. Child Development, 49, 953–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coltman, P. (2006). Talk of a number: Self-regulated use of mathematical metalanguage by children in the Foundation Stage. Early Years, 26(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. J. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 191–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Cultice, J. C., Somerville, S. C., & Wellman, H. M. (1983). Preschoolers’ memory monitoring: Feeling of knowing. Child Development, 54, 1480–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Op’t Eynde, P. (2000). Self-regulation: A characteristic and a goal of mathematics education. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 687–726). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deloache, J. S., Sugarman, S., & Brown, A. L. (1985). The development of error correction strategies in young children’s manipulative play. Child Development, 56, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis of self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fabricius, W. V., & Hagen, J. W. (1984). Use of causal attributions about recall performance to assess metamemory and predict strategic memory behaviour in young children. Developmental Psychology, 20, 975–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21–29). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R., & Chinsky, J. M. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a function of age. Child Development, 37, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Constructing communication by hand. Cognitive Development, 17, 1385–1405.Google Scholar
  20. Hattie, J. A., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.Google Scholar
  21. Istomina, Z. M. (1975). The development of voluntary memory in preschool age children. Soviet Psychology, 13, 5–64.Google Scholar
  22. Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, S. C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(1), serial no. 159.Google Scholar
  23. Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer, D., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37, 17–25.Google Scholar
  25. Moyles, J., Paterson, F., & Kitson, N. (2003). It wasn’t as bad as I thought! Learning from reflective dialogues. In J. Moyles, L. Hargreaves, R. Merry, & F. Paterson (Eds.), Interactive teaching in the primary school (pp. 141–154). Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pape, S. J., & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behaviour: Classification and relation to academic achievement and mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 31, 419–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perry, N. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. J. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher–student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
  30. Piaget, J. (1977). The grasp of consciousness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. Pine, K. J., Lufkin, N., & Messer, D. (2004). More gestures than answers: Children learning about balance. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1059–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pino Pasternak, D. (2006). Analysing parent–child interactions during study-related activities and their impact on children’s self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the second meeting of the EARLI SIG 16. Metacognition: University of Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41, 219–225.Google Scholar
  35. Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2004). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruffman, T., Garnham, W., Import, A., & Connolly, D. (2001). Does eye gaze indicate implicit knowledge of false belief? Charting transitions in knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2002). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 224–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Shamir, A., Mevarech, Z. R., & Gida, C. (2009). The assessment of meta-cognition in different contexts: individualised vs. peer assisted learning. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Son, L. K., & Schwartz, B. L. (2002). The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 15–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Intervention for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whitebread, D., Anderson, H., Coltman, P., Page, C., Pino Pasternak, D., & Mehta, S. (2005). Developing independent learning in the early years. Education, 3–13, 33., 40–50.Google Scholar
  44. Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V., Pino Pasternak, D., & Sangster, C. (2007a). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: The role of collaborative and peer-assisted learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6, 433–455.Google Scholar
  45. Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pino Pasternak, D., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., et al. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whitebread, D., Pino Pasternak, D., Sangster, C., & Coltman, P. (2007b). A metacognició nemverbális indikátorai kisyermekkorban (Non-verbal indicators of metacognition in young children). Iskolakultúra, 11–12, 82–91.Google Scholar
  47. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 532–566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations