Israel Journal of Mathematics

, Volume 207, Issue 2, pp 981–1000 | Cite as

Extensions of maps to Moore spaces

Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

We show that a Moore space M(ℤ m , 1) is an absolute extensor for finite-dimensional metrizable spaces of cohomological dimension at most one with respect to the group ℤ m . Applications of this result are discussed.

Keywords

Fundamental Group Simplicial Complex Quotient Space Metrizable Space Extension Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Cencelj and A. N. Dranishnikov, Extension of maps into nilpotent spaces. III, Topology and its Applications 153 (2005), 208–212.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Cencelj, J. Dydak, A. Mitra and A. Vavpetič, Hurewicz-Serre theorem in extension theory, Fundamenta Mathematicae 198 (2008), 113–123MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. N. Dranishnikov, An extension of mappings into CW-complexes, Matematicheskĭ Sbornik 182 (1991), 1300–1310; English translation: Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik 74 (1993), 47–56.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. N. Dranishnikov, Cohomological dimension theory of compact metric spaces, Topology Atlas invited contribution 6 (2001), 7–73, http://at.yorku.ca/topology.taic.html (see also arXiv:math/0501523).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Dydak, Cohomological dimension and metrizable spaces. II. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 348 (1996), 1647–1661.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Dydak and M. Levin, Extensions of maps to the projective plane, Algebraic & Geometric Topology 5 (2005), 1711–1718.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Dydak and M. Levin, Maps to the projective plane. Algebraic & Geometric Topology 9 (2009), 549–568.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    V. I. Kuzminov, Homological dimension theory, Russian Math Surveys 23(5) (1968), 1–45.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Levin, On compacta not admitting a stable intersection in ℝn, arXiv:1310.2091Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    N. E. Steenrod, The Topology of Fibre Bundles, Princeton Mathematical Series, Vol. 14, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1951.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsBen Gurion University of the NegevBe’er ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations