Israel Journal of Mathematics

, Volume 195, Issue 1, pp 393–447 | Cite as

A Haar component for quantum limits on locally symmetric spaces

Article

Abstract

We prove lower bounds for the entropy of limit measures associated to non-degenerate sequences of eigenfunctions on locally symmetric spaces of non-positive curvature. In the case of certain compact quotients of the space of positive definite n × n matrices (any quotient for n = 3, quotients associated to inner forms in general), measure classification results then show that the limit measures must have a Haar component. This is consistent with the conjecture that the limit measures are absolutely continuous.

Keywords

Lyapunov Exponent Symmetric Space Weyl Group Quantum Limit Division Algebra 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    N. Anantharaman, Entropy and the localization of eigenfunctions, Annals of Mathematics, Second Series 168 (2008), 435–475.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    N. Anantharaman, Exponential decay for products of Fourier integral operators, Methods and Applications of Analysis 18 (2011), 165–181.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    N. Anantharaman, S. Nonnenmacher, Half-delocalization of eigenfunctions for the Laplacian on an Anosov manifold Université de Grenoble, Annales de l’Institut Fourier 57 (2007), 2465–2523.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. Anantharaman, H. Koch and S. Nonnenmacher, Entropy of eigenfunctions, in New Trends of Mathematical Physics, selected contributions of the 15th International Congress on Mathematical Physics, Springer, Berlin, 2009, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Bourgain and E. Lindenstrauss, Entropy of quantum limits, Communications in Mathematical Physics 233 (2003), 153–171.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    U. Bunke and M. Olbrich, On quantum ergodicity for vector bundles, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 90 (2006), 19–41.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Dimassi, J. Sjöstrand, Spectral Asymptotics in the Semi-classical Limit, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 268, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Einsiedler and A. Katok, Invariant measures on G/γ for split simple Lie groups G, Dedicated to the memory of Jürgen K. Moser, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 56 (2003), 1184–1221.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Einsiedler, A. Katok and E. Lindenstrauss, Invariant measures and the set of exceptions to Littlewood’s conjecture, Annals of Mathematics, Second Series 164 (2006), 513–560.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Godement, Introduction à la théorie des groupes de Lie, Tome 2, Publications Mathématiques de l’Université Paris VII 12, Université de Paris VII, U.E.R. de Mathématiques, Paris, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Helgason, Groups and Geometric Analysis. Integral Geometry, Invariant Differential Operators, and Spherical Functions, Pure and Applied Mathematics 113, Academic Press Inc., Orlando, 1984.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Helgason, Geometric Analysis on Symmetric Spaces, Second edition, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 39, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Hilgert An ergodic Arnold-Liouville theorem for locally symmetric spaces, in Twenty years of Bialowieza: a Mathematical Anthology, World Scientific Monograph Series in Mathematics 8, World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2005, pp. 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, Progress in Mathematics 140, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1996.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Knapp, Representation Theory of Semisimple Groups, An overview based on examples, Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    E. Lindenstrauss, Invariant measures and arithmetic quantum unique ergodicity, Annals of Mathematics 163 (2006), 165–219.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    E. Lindenstrauss and B. Weiss, On sets invariant under the action of the diagonal group. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 21 (2001), 1481–1500.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    V. Platonov and A. Rapinchuk, Algebraic Groups and Number Theory, Translated from the 1991 Russian original by Rachel Rowen, Pure and Applied Mathematics 139, Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1994, xii+614 pp.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    G. Rivière, Entropy of semiclassical measures in dimension 2, Duke Mathematical Journal 155 (2010), 271–336MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    G. Rivière, Entropy of semiclassical measures for nonpositively curved surfaces, Annales Henri Pincaré. A Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 11 (2010), 1085–1116.MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Z. Rudnick and P. Sarnak, The behaviour of eigenstates of arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds, Communications in Mathematical Physics 161 (1994), 195–213.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Schröder, Patterson-Sullivan distributions for symmetric spaces of the noncompact type, PhD dissertation, Universität Paderborn, 2010.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    L. Silberman and A. Venkatesh, On quantum unique ergodicity for locally symmetric spaces, Geometric and Functional Analysis 17 (2007), 960–998.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    L. Silberman and A. Venkatesh, Entropy bounds for Hecke eigenfunctions on division algebras, Geometric and Functional Analysis, to appear.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    K. Soundararajan, Quantum Unique Ergodicity for SL2(Z)\H, Annals of Mathematics, Second Series 172 (2010), 1529–1538.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    G. Tomanov, Actions of maximal tori on homogeneous spaces, in Rigidity in Dynamics and Geometry (Cambridge, 2000), Springer, Berlin, 2002, pp. 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    S. A. Wolpert, The modulus of continuity for γ0(m)\ℍ semi-classical limits, Communications in Mathematical Physics 216 (2001), 313–323.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    S. Zelditch, Pseudodifferential analysis on hyperbolic surfaces, Journal of Functional Analysis 68 (1986), 72–105.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hebrew University Magnes Press 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de MathématiqueUniversité d’Orsay Paris XIOrsay CedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations