Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1117–1128 | Cite as

Coastal sensitivity and population exposure to sea level rise: a case study on Santa Catarina Island, Brazil

  • Carolina Schmanech MussiEmail author
  • Jarbas Bonetti
  • Rafael Medeiros Sperb
Article

Abstract

Climate change intensifies the pressure on the coastal zone, endangering ecosystems, socioeconomic activities and coastal infrastructure, with direct impact on the economy of these areas. Although coastal hazard effects have been widely studied, the lack of information in local scale prevents a more effective urban and natural resources management. In order to assess coastal sensitivity and the population exposure to sea level rise, this study evaluated and adapted an index to represent sectors more likely to suffer from the effects of erosion and flooding along the coast of Santa Catarina Island, Brazil. A methodology centred on segmentation and index-based strategies was adapted to the local conditions, using criteria representing coastal geomorphology and dynamics to assess natural sensitivity, which was combined with census data to represent population exposure. Santa Catarina Island was chosen as a test site for three reasons: (a) the existence of a full set of previous data; (b) its diversity of environments; and (c) an important record of erosion and inundation events in several of its beaches. Results showed that the most sensitive areas are located on the island’s eastern shore, reflecting its higher exposure to the incidence on the ocean waves. Although this west-east contrast had been expected as the key sensitivity feature in the island, its integration with population density allowed the recognition of a more complex pattern. Since variable population densities occur in the both sides of Santa Catarina Island, highly sensible but not urbanized segments were detected in the eastern coast (low exposure), as well as densely occupied sectors in not sensible areas of the western coast (high exposure). The adopted strategy (use of a demographic descriptor to obtain exposure from its integration with sensitivity), was not proposed in the original methodologies of sensitivity assessments and improved the representativeness of the spatial model. Obtained results demonstrated the importance of comprehensive coastal management plans, where both physical and demographic aspects should be considered.

Keywords

Coastal hazards Physical susceptibility Social vulnerability Spatial analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of CORILA Consortium and Dr. Roger Longhorn; the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES; Grant: BEX-1163/14-0) and the Brazilian Network of Coastal Risks. Valuable insights on the design of this research were kindly provided by Prof. Colin Woodroffe, Dr. Pamela Abuodha and Chris Sharples.

References

  1. Abuodha, P.A.O (2009) Application and evaluation of shoreline segmentation mapping approaches to assessing response to climate change on the Illawarra Coast, South East Australia. PhD Thesis. School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of WollongongGoogle Scholar
  2. Abuodha PA, Woodroffe CD (2010) Assessing vulnerability to sea-level rise using a coastal sensitivity index: a case study from southeast Australia. J Coast Conserv Plann Manag 14:189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves JHGM, Melo E (2001) Measurement and modeling of wind waves at the northern coast of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Rev Bras Oceanogr 49:13–28.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-77392001000100002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonetti J, Woodroffe CD (2017) Spatial analysis on GIS for coastal vulnerability assessment. In: Bartlett D, Celliers L (eds) Geoinformatics for Marine and Coastal Management. Taylor and Francis, England, pp 367–395Google Scholar
  5. Bonetti J, Klein AHF, Muler M, De Luca CB, Silva GV, Toldo EE Jr, González M (2013) Spatial and numerical methodologies on coastal erosion and flooding risk assessment. In: Finkl C (ed) Coastal Hazards. Coastal Research Library Series. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 423–442Google Scholar
  6. Bonetti J, Rudorff FM, Campos AV, Serafim MB (2018) Geoindicator-based assessment of Santa Catarina (Brazil) Sandy beaches susceptibility to erosion. SI: Manag Strateg Coast Erosion Problems Coast Ocean Manag 156:198–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown I (2006) Modelling future landscape change on coastal floodplains using a rule-basedGIS. Environ Model Softw 21:1479–1490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buitrago RN, Anfuso G (2015) Review of the existing risk assessment methods. In: Risk Assessment of Storms in Coastal Zones: Case Studies from Cartagena (Colombia) and Cadiz (Spain). Springer, Dordrecht, pp 7–13Google Scholar
  9. Cardona OD, van Aalst MK, Birkmann J, Fordham M, McGregor G, Perez R, Pulwarty RS, Schipper ELF, Sinh BT (2012) Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. In: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 65–108Google Scholar
  10. Caruso F Jr (1993) Mapa geológico da ilha de Santa Catarina –Escala 1:100.000. Texto explicativo e mapa. Notas Técnicas 6:1–28Google Scholar
  11. Costa FHS, Petta RA, Lima RFS, Medeiros CN (2006) Determinação davulnerabilidade ambiental na bacia potiguar, região de Macau (RN), utilizando sistemas deinformações geográficas. Rev Bras Cartogr 58(02):119–129Google Scholar
  12. Dwarakish GS, Vinay SA, Natesan U, Asano T, Kakinuma T, Venkataramana K, Pai BJ, Babita MK (2009) Coastal vulnerability assessment of the future sea level rise in Udupicoastal zone of Karnatake state, west coast of India. Ocean Coast Manag 53(09):467–478.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3291-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gornitz V (1991) Global coastal hazards from future sea level rise. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 89:379–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(91)90173-O CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gornitz, V. & Kanciruk, P. (1989). Assessment of global coastal hazards from sea-level rise. Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Coastal and Ocean management, ASCE, July 11-14 1989, Charleston, USA, pp 1345-1359Google Scholar
  15. IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2011) Base de informações do Censo Demográfico 2010: Resultados do Universo por setor censitário. Centro de Documentação e Disseminação de Informações/IBGE/Ministério de Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, 151 pGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein AHF, Short AD, Bonetti J (2016) Santa Catarina beach systems. In: Short AD, Klein AHF (eds) Brazilian Beach Systems. Chapter 17. Coastal Research Library, vol 17. Springer, Cham, pp 465–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lins de Barros FM, Muehe D (2013) The Smartline Approach to Coastal Vulnerability and Social Risk Assessment Applied to a Segment of the East Coast of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. J Coast Conserv 17(2):211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mazzer AM, Dillenburg SR, Souza CRG (2008) Proposta de método para análise devulnerabilidade à erosão costeira no sudeste da ilha de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Rev Bras Geociências 38(2):278–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLaughlin S, Cooper JAG (2010) A multi-scale vulnerability index: A tool for coastal managers? Environ Hazard 9:233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MMA- Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2007) Atlas de Sensibilidade Ambiental ao Óleo da Bacia de Santos (Cartas SAO) http://www.mma.gov.br/seguranca-quimica/cartas-de-sensibilidade-ao-oleo/atlas,-cartas-e-mapas. Accessed 30 September 2017
  22. MMA- Ministério do Meio Ambiente (n.d.) Especificações e normas técnicas para elaboração de cartas de sensibilidade ambiental para derramamentos de óleo. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Mudanças Climáticas e Qualidade Ambiental, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen TTX, Woodroffe CD (2016) Assessing relative vulnerability to sea-level rise in the western part of the Mekong River Delta in Vietnam. Sustain Sci 2015:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0336-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nguyen TTX, Bonetti J, Rogers K, Woodroffe CD (2016) Indicator-based assessment of climate-change impacts on coasts: a review of concepts, approaches and vulnerability indices. Ocean Coast Manag 123:18–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett VR, Codignotto JO, Hay JE, McLean RF, Ragoonaden S, Woodroffe CD (2007) Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 315–356Google Scholar
  26. Oliveira UR, Parizotto BADM, Horn Filho NO, Bonetti J (2012) Setorização morfosedimentar das praias arenosas da Ilha de Santa Catarina (SC) utilizando técnicas de análise estatística multivariada. Gravel 10(1):1–11Google Scholar
  27. Pianca C, Mazzini PLF, Siegle E (2010) Brazilian offshore wave climate based on NWW3 reanalysis. Braz J Oceanogr 58(1):53–70.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592010000100006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rudorff FM, Bonetti J (2010) Avaliação da suscetibilidade à erosão costeira de praias da Ilha de Santa Catarina. Braz J Aquat Sci Technol 14(1):9–20.  https://doi.org/10.14210/bjast.v14n1.p9-20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rudorff FM, Bonetti Filho J, Moreno DA, Oliveira CAF, Murara PG (2014) Maré de Tempestade. In: Herrmann MLP (ed) Atlas de Desastres Naturais do Estado de Santa Catarina: período de 1980 a 2010. 2. Ed. IHGSC/Cadernos Geográficos, Florianópolis, pp 151–154Google Scholar
  30. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharples C (2006) Indicative mapping of Tasmanian coastal vulnerability to climate change and sea-level rise: Explanatory Report, 2nd edn. Consultant Report to Department of Primary Industries & Water, Tasmania, 173 pGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharples C, Mount R, Pedersen T (2009) The Australian coastal smartline geomorphic and stability map version 1: manual and data dictionary. School of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, 179 pGoogle Scholar
  33. Szlafsztein F, Sterr A (2007) A GIS-based vulnerability assessment of coastal natural hazards, state of Pará, Brazil. J Coast Res 11(1):53–66.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-007-003-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2004) Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development. John S. Swift, New York, 96 pGoogle Scholar
  35. UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2009) UNISDR Terminology on disaster reduction. United Nations, Geneva, 30 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolina Schmanech Mussi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jarbas Bonetti
    • 1
  • Rafael Medeiros Sperb
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratório de Oceanografia CosteiraUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande-Rio GrandeRio Grande do SulBrazil

Personalised recommendations