Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 755–767 | Cite as

Mitigating tourism-driven impacts on mangroves in Cancún and the Riviera Maya, Mexico: an evaluation of conservation policy strategies and environmental planning instruments

  • Ludger Brenner
  • Manuel Engelbauer
  • Hubert Job
Article

Abstract

The characteristics and patterns of tourism-driven impacts on mangroves are considerable, but still poorly understood. Therefore, this paper focuses on Mexico’s prime holiday destination to shed light on the specific environmental effects of high-end tourist development. It also evaluates the context-specific and structural challenges that conservation strategies and measures recently-applied to mitigate tourism-related environmental degradation of mangroves face. Fieldwork conducted from 2013 to 2015 was based on in-depth interviews with experts and mapping. Results show that the implementation of legal norms and environmental planning has not impeded the progressive deterioration of mangroves. Complex, self-reinforcing impacts due to site-specific natural conditions and vulnerability to encroachments, political priorities at the local and regional levels, poor integration of environmental policies, the predominance of private land tenure, and the prohibition of retroactive legislation, coupled with weak law enforcement, continue to thwart efforts to conserve the remaining mangroves. Thus, reconciling the long-term conservation of highly-vulnerable wetlands with a fast-growing tourism sector remains a difficult task, as comprehensive legal frameworks and detailed spatial environmental planning at the national and regional levels encounter considerable obstacles when attempts are made to implement them at the local level.

Keywords

Tourism Mangroves Conservation Mexico 

Notes

Funding

The authors appreciate the funding from the National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO/Convenio FB 1673/KE010/13, Mexico) and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, Germany). Special thanks to Rainer Ressl and Verónica Aguilar Sierra for their kind support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

They declare that they have no conflicts of interests regarding this research.

Supplementary material

11852_2018_606_MOESM1_ESM.docx (31 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

References

  1. Aburto Orozepa O, Ezcurra E, Danemann G, Valdez V, Murray J, Sala E (2008) Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(30):10456–10459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso-Pérez F, Ruíz Luna A, Turner J, Berlanga-Robles C, Mitchelson-Jacob G (2003) Land cover change and impact of shrimp aquaculture on the landscape in the Ceita coastal lagoon, Sinaloa, Mexico. Ocean Coast Manag 46:583–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage D (2002) Socio-institutional dynamics and the political ecology of mangrove forest conservation in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Glob Environ Chang 12:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnegger J (2014) Protected areas, the tourist bubble and regional economic development. University of Würzburg, Germany, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  5. Avau JM, Cunha-Lignon B, De Myttenaere M, Godart F, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2011) The commercial images promoting Caribbean mangroves to tourist: case studies in Jamaica, Guadeloupe and Martinique. J Coast Res 64:1277–1284Google Scholar
  6. Avila Foucat VS (2002) Community-based ecotourism management moving towards sustainibility, in Ventanilla, Oaxaca, Mexico. Ocean Coast Manag 45:511–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbier E, Cox M (2003) Does economic development lead to mangrove loss? A cross-country analysis. Contemp Econ Policy 21(4):418–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner L (2015) Análisis de las consecuencias de la política pública en el contexto de la conservación de los manglares: los casos de La Palma/Mecoacán (Tabasco), La Encrucijada (Chiapas), Punta Maroma/Chacmuchuc (Quintana Roo) y Agua Dulce/El Ermitaño (Jalisco). Final Report, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  9. Brenner L, Aguilar AG (2002) Luxury tourism and regional economic development in Mexico. Prof Geogr 54(4):500–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP) (2016) Áreas Naurales Protegidas de México. http://sig.conanp.gob.mx. Accessed 16 May 2016
  11. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) (2009) Manglares de México: extensión y distribución. CONABIO, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  12. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) (2013) Manglares de México: extensión, distribución y monitoreo. CONABIO, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  13. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) (2016) Manglares de México: extensión, distribución y monitoreo (1970/1980–2015). CONABIO, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  14. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) (2017) Manglares de México: actualización y exploración de los datos del sistema de monitoreo (1970/1980–2015). CONABIO, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelbauer, M (2015) Raumnutzungskonflikte zwischen Tourismus und Mangrovenschutz: das Beispiel Cancún, Mexiko. Master Thesis, University of Würzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernandez Vázquez E (2014) Integración de la política ambiental en México. Gestión y Política Pública 23(2):465–505Google Scholar
  17. Flores Mejía MA, Aguirre VA, Flores Hernández M, Guardado Govea X (2010) El impacto que produce el sector turismo en los manglares en las costas mexicanas. Contact Dermatitis 77:33–38Google Scholar
  18. Galmiche Tejera A, Solana Villanueva N (2011) El contexto de la vulnerabilidad de las poblacones costeras y valores asignados al manglar en Tabasco. Government of the State of Tabasco, VillahermosaGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaser M, da Silva Oliveira R (2004) Prospects for the co-management of mangrove ecosystems on the north Brazilian coast: whose rights, whose duties and whose priorities? Nat Res Forum 28:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gössling S (2001) Tourism, economic transition and ecosystem degradation. Tour Geogr 3(4):430–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hastings RM, Fisher DW (2001) Management priorties for Magdalena Bay, Baja California, Mexico. J Coast Conserv 7:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirales Cota M, Espinoza J, Smook B, Ruiz A, Ramos R (2010) Drivers of mangrove deforestation in Mahual-Xcalak, Quintana Roo, southeast Mexico. Ciencias Marinas 36:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Instituto de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) (2017) Censos y conteos de población y vivienda. http://inegi.org.mx/est/contenido/proyectos/ccpv. Accessed 17 May 2017
  24. Jacob K, Volkery A (2004) Institutions and instruments for government self-regulation: environmental policy integration in a cross-country perspective. J Comp Policy Anal: Res Pract 6(3):291–309Google Scholar
  25. Jiménez Martínez AJ (2010) Cadenas hoteleras. Estrategias y territorio en el Caribe mexicano. Porrúa, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  26. Job H, Paesler F (2013) Links between nature-based tourism, protected areas, poverty alleviation and crises–the example of Wasini Island (Kenya). J Outdoor Recreation Tour 1(1/2):18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordan A, Lenschow A (2010) Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environ Policy Governance 20:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaplowitz M (2000) Identifying ecosystem services using multiply methods: lessons from the mangrove wetlands of Yucatán, Mexico. Agric Hum Values 17:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lafferty W, Hovden E (2003) Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environ Polit 12(3):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. López Medellín X, Ezcurra E, González A, Hak J, Santiago L, Sickman J (2011) Contrasting perspectives on mangroves in arid northwestern Mexico: implications for integrated coastal management. Ocean Coast Manag 54(4):318–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. López-Portillo J, Ezcurra E (2002) Los manglares de México: una revisión. Madera & Bosques (special edition): 27–51Google Scholar
  32. Mangora MM (2011) Poverty and institutional management stand-off: a restoration and conservation dilemma for mangrove forests in Tanzania. Wetl Ecol Manag 19:533–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mayring P (2010) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz, Weinheim and BaselGoogle Scholar
  34. Municipio de Benito Juárez (2005) Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Local del Municipio Benito Juárez, Quintana Roo. CancúnGoogle Scholar
  35. Municipio de Benito Juárez (2014) Modificacion del Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Local del Municipio de Benito Juárez, Quintana Roo. CancúnGoogle Scholar
  36. Ortiz Lozano L, Granados A, Solís V, García M (2005) Environmental evaluation and development problems of the Mexican coastal zone. Ocean Coast Manag 48(2):161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Primavera JH (2000) Development and conservation of Philippine mangroves: institutional issues. Ecol Econ 35:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Primavera JH (2005) Mangroves, fishponds, and the quest for sustainibility. Science 310:57–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riviera Perera GJ, Sánchez Trujillo MG (2013) Las limitaciones del Artículo 60 TER de la Ley General de Vida Silvestre. Derecho Ambiental y Ecología 57:55–59Google Scholar
  40. Ruiz Luna A, Cervantes A, Berlanga C (2010) Assessing distribution patterns, extent, and current condition of northwest Mexico mangroves. Wetlands 30(4):717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sánchez Salazar M, Casado Izquierdo J, Bocco Verdinelli G (2013) La política de ordenamiento territorial en México: de la teoría a la práctica. Reflexiones sobre sus avances y retos a futuro. In: Sánchez Salazar M, Casado Izquierdo J, Bocco Verdinelli G (eds) La política de ordenamiento territorial en México: de la teoría a la práctica. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Mexico City, pp 19–46Google Scholar
  42. Sanjurjo Riviera E, Campos P (2011) Análisis de las actividades económicas en un manglar de usos múltiples. Un estudio de caso en San Blas. Estudios Sociales 19(38):197–220Google Scholar
  43. Secretaría de Gobernación (SEGOB) (2007) Decreto por el que adiciona un artículo 60 TER y se adiciona un segundo párrafo al artículo 99; todo ellos de la Ley General de Vida Silvestre. Diario Oficial de la Federación del 1 de Febrero de 2007Google Scholar
  44. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT) (2003) Norma Ofical Mexicana NOM-022-SEMARNAT-2003. Mexico City, SEMARNATGoogle Scholar
  45. Secretaría de Turismo de Turismo (SECTUR) (2016) Compendio Estadístico del Turismo en México. http://datatur.sectur.gob.mx/SitePages/CompendioEstadistico.aspx. Accessed 17 May 2017
  46. Spalding M, Kainuma M, Collins L (2010) World atlas of mangroves. Earthscan, London and Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Torres R, Momsen JD (2005) Gringolandia: the construction of a new tourist space in Mexico. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 95(2):314–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vandergeest P, Flaherty M, Miller P (1999) A political ecology of shrimp aquaculture in Thailand. Rural Sociol 64(4):573–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vázquez-Lule AD, Adame MF (2009) Caracterización del sitio de manglar Puerto Morelos–Punta Maroma. In: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (ed.) Sitios de manglar con relevancia biológica y con necesidades de rehabilitación ecológica. CONABIO, Mexico City, p 1–11Google Scholar
  50. Walters B, Rönnbäck P, Kovacs J, Crona B, Hussain S, Badola R, Dahdouh F (2008) Ethnobiology, socio-economics and management of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat Bot 89(2):220–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zaldívar-Jimenez MA, Herrera-Silveira JA, Teutli-Hernández C, Comín FA (2010) Conceptual framework for mangrove restoration in the Yucatán peninsular. Ecol Restor 28(3):333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Campus IztapalapaMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Institute for Geography and GeologyJulius-Maximilians-Universität WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations