Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ancient settlement dynamics and predictive archaeological models for the Metapontum coastal area in Basilicata, southern Italy: from geomorphological survey to spatial analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the ancient territory of the Greek settlement of Metaponto and its Chora (Ionian sector of Basilicata, southern Italy) geomorphological mapping, GIS-supported statistics, and landform topographic features were investigated and combined to extract settlement rules and site dynamics. Analyses of environmental dynamics as well as of spatial and temporal settlement evolution were carried through an integrated approach that, starting from a detailed geomorphological analysis, tried to extract the spatial relationships between archaeological site locations and landform/landscape features. Spatial analysis was used to investigate the relationships between environmental parameters and archaeological sites. The advantages to develop a predictive model using Archeological Spatial Evaluation (ASE) analysis lay in the possibility to deeply study the relationships between man and the environment. In the present study, the analysis was carried out in a pioneering way in the ~400 km2 Metaponto territory in order to robustly validate - in the aftermath data - human and territorial dynamics. A model describing interactions between sites and parameters such as elevation, slope, aspect, landforms, land use, and distances from rivers was constructed. Sensibility maps were produced, which will help archaeologists to know how many and which are the parameters increasing the probability to find new archaeological sites as well as how the main geomorphological features of the study area, contextualized within the most likely paleoclimate scenario, affect ancient site arrangement though time. The preferential occupation of mid-altitude marine terraces, and the consequence spreading of agriculture on these territories, is likely due to the existence of well-developed soil profiles on them. Clearly colonists recognized that on these landform units there were the better conditions for the development of massive agricultural practices: since the SP age (4,1 to 2,0 Kyr B.P.) the settlers expands inland looking for most fertile territories as well as for areas sufficiently protected (being far away from the coast). The increase in farmhouses on the top of marine terraces from the FC up to EC-EE periods and the modifications of settlement distribution (gradual abandonment of alluvial) in the Metaponto area is likely related to the acceleration of alluvial processes. The progressive decrease of human occupation during the Hellenistic up to the Roman Age is clearly consequence of the Roman conquest. However, a role played by the increase in flooding occurrence in the coastal plain/floodplains of the main rivers in triggering the abandonment of these territories and marking the beginning of the decadent phases should not be neglected. Productive areas (locally associated to farmhouses) are preferential set along the fluvial incisions (sometime associated to farmhouses), thus implying that productive area setting is strongly linked to the presence of rivers, and of their lower rank tributaries, both as an intrinsic need of manufacturing and to facilitate the spreading of products. From the Classical to the Hellenistic Age until the Roman Age, Necropolis are spread in the entire area, from marine terraces to alluvial plain. On the other hand, Sacred areas - which appearance is recorded starting from the Colony Foundation Age - exhibits a settlement continuity in the study area starting from this time up to the entire Roman period, and the sacred areas setting is strictly associated to the category of Settlement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamesteanu D (1973) Metaponto. La Buona Stampa, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamesteanu D (1986) Incoronata – Scavi della Soprintendenza Archeologica della Basilicata (1971-1972). In: Scavi Archeologici di Basilicata (S.A.d. Basilicata Ed.), I Greci sul Basento, Como, p 25-27. 

  • Adamesteanu D, Mertens D, D’Andria F (1975) Metaponto I, in Nsc XXIX, Suppl., serie VIII, vol. XXIX

  • Adamesteanu D, Chiartano B, Carter JC, Mac Namara E (1977) Metaponto II, in NSc XXXI I, Suppl

  • Anschuetz KF, Wilshusen RH, Scheik CL (2001) An archaeology of landscapes: perspectives and directions. J Archaeol Res 9(2):157–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore W, Knapp AB (1999) Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Blackwell Publishers, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates RL, Jackson JA (2005) Glossary of Geology, 5th edn. American Geological Institute, New York, p 800

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavusi M, Bianca M, Izzi F, Di Leo P, Parisi S, Pulice I, Schiattarella M (2015) Methods and Technologies for the Cultural Heritages in Basilicata region: a case-study from the coastal belt of Metapontum. Rendiconti online Soc Geol It 34:101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo R, Bianca M, D'Onofrio R (2010) Ionian marine terraces of southern Italy: insights into the quaternary tectonic evolution of the area. Tectonics 29(TC4005),1-23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009TC002625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter JC (1990) Dividing the Chora - Metaponto in the 6th-Century-Bc. Am J Archaeol 94(2):320

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter JC (2003) Metaponto. Gnomon-Kritische Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Klassische Altertumswissenschaft 75:715–720.

  • Carter JC (2008) La scoperta del territorio rurale Greco di Metaponto. Osanna Edizioni, Venosa (Italy), pp 400.

  • Carter JC, Prieto A (2011) The chora of Metaponto 3. archaeological field survey Bradano to Basento. University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Danese M, Gioia D, Biscione M, Masini N (2014a) Spatial methods for archaeological flood risk: the case study of the neolithic sites in the apulia region (southern Italy). Springer Verlag, Guimaraes, p 8579 LNCS. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09144-0_29

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Danese M, Masini N, Biscione M, Lasaponara R (2014b) Predictive modeling for preventive Archaeology: verview and case study. Central European Journal of Geosciences 6(1):42–55. doi:10.2478/s13533-012-0160-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danese M, Cassiodoro G, Guichón F, Goñi R, Masini N, Lasaponara R, Nolè G (2016) Spatial analysis for the study of environmental settlement patterns: the archaeological sites of the Santa Cruz province. In: Gervasi O, Murgante B, Misra S, Rocha AMAC, Torre CM, Taniar D, Apduhan BO, Stankova E, Wang S (Eds.): ICCSA 2016, Part III, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 9789(part IV):191-203

    Google Scholar 

  • De Siena A (1986a) Scavi in località Incoronata ed a Metaponto: nuove scoperte. I Greci sul Basento, Como, pp 199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • De Siena A (1986b) Termitito e San Vito di Pisticci: dati archeologici e problemi interpretativi, Siris-Polieion. Fonti letterarie e nuova documentazione archeologica, Galatina, pp 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • De Siena A (1999) Il Metapontino: Insediamenti antichi e bonifiche. Archeologia dell’acqua in Basilicata, Lavello, pp 53–72

    Google Scholar 

  • De Siena A (2001) Il territorio di Metaponto. Atti Taranto, XL, Taranto 2000, Napoli, 757–769

  • Dikau R (1989) The application of a digital relief model to landform analysis in geomorphology. In: Paper J (ed) Three dimensional applications in Geographical Information Systems. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 51–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia D, Gallicchio S, Moretti M, Schiattarella M (2014) Landscape response to tectonic and climatic forcing in the foredeep of the southern Apennines, Italy: insights from Quaternary stratigraphy, quantitative geomorphic analysis, and denudation rate proxies. Earth Surf Process Landf 39:814–835. doi:10.1002/Esp.3544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia D, Bavusi M, Di Leo P, Giammatteo T, Schiattarella M (2016) A geoarchaeological study of the Metaponto coastal belt, southern Italy, based on geomorphological mapping and GIS-supported classification of landforms. Geogr Fis Din Quat 39:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, Reuter HI (2009) Geomorphometry: Concepts, Software, Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Osanna M (1992) Chorai coloniali da Taranto a Locri. Documentazione archeologica e ricostruzione storica, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Osanna M (1996) Metaponto, In: Lippolis E. (ed.) I Greci in Occidente. Arte e Artigianato in Magna Grecia, Napoli, pp 45–49

  • Osanna M (1999) Territorio coloniale e frontiera. La documentazione archeologica, In: Atti Taranto, XXXVII, Taranto 1998, Napoli, 273–292

  • Osanna M (2001) Fattorie e villaggi in Magna Greci. Atti Taranto, XL, Taranto 2000, Napoli. 203–220

  • Pieri P, Sabato L, Tropeano M (1996) Significato geodinamico dei caratteri deposizionali e strutturali della Fossa bradanica del Pleistocene. Mem Soc Geol It 51:501–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiattarella M, Giano SI, Gioia D (2017) Long-term geomorphological evolution of the axial zone of the Campania-Lucania Apennine, southern Italy: a review. Geol Carpath 68:57–67. doi:10.1515/geoca-2017-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shary PA, Stepanov IN (1991) On the second derivative method in geology. Doklady AN SSSR 31:456–460 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn S, Crawford T (1999) A predictive model of archaeological potential: an example from northwestern Belize. Appl Geogr 29(4):542–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen P, Dragut L (2012) Object-based landform delineation and classification from DEMs for archaeological predictive mapping. J Archaeol Sci 39:698–703. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was funded by PO-FESR granted to Dr. Paola Di Leo. Authors are grateful to two anonymous referees for their accurate revisions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Di Leo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Leo, P., Bavusi, M., Corrado, G. et al. Ancient settlement dynamics and predictive archaeological models for the Metapontum coastal area in Basilicata, southern Italy: from geomorphological survey to spatial analysis. J Coast Conserv 22, 865–877 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0548-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0548-y

Keywords

Navigation