Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 139–144 | Cite as

Aboveground biomass and carbon stock are related with soil humidity in a mangrove at the Piraquê-Açu River, Southeastern Brazil

  • José Thales da Motta Portillo
  • Vinícius LondeEmail author
  • Francisco Wagner Araújo Moreira
Article

Abstract

In Brazil, few studies have been conducted about the assimilation of carbon and biomass accumulation in mangroves despite its great role as a carbon sink. In this sense, this study aimed to estimate the aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon stocked by mangrove species in a stretch along the Piraquê-Açu River in southeastern Brazil, and to verify their relation with some soil parameters. For such, the height and diameter of all trees inside six plots of 100 m2 were measured and used to quantify AGB through an allometric equation, and soil samples were collected to calculate granulometry, humidity, time of infiltration and permeability. Multiple regressions were used to identify relations between AGB and soil parameters. A total of 296 trees were found in the area and the AGB and carbon assimilated were 2.92 t ha−1 and 1.46 t ha−1, respectively. Laguncularia racemosa was the most abundant species and contributed with 61% of these values. Only a positive relation between AGB/carbon of L. racemosa and soil humidity was found, probably due to the substrate characteristics which contain a large concentration of silt/clay, and may store more water and do not yet provide firmness to the roots. By comparison, this mangrove had a low amount of AGB and carbon stocked and has yet to develop structurally. Along with other ecological functions and its associated ecosystem services such as supplying food for the local community, these features highlight the importance to conserve the studied mangrove and the interlinked coastal ecosystems.

Key words

Avicennia schaueriana Coastal ecosystems Laguncularia racemosa Rizophora mangle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of the Higher Education Personnel) by their master’s scholarship, to PROPP (Department of research and graduate programs) and PPG-BIOMAS (Graduate Program in Ecology of Tropical Biomes), both from the Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), by their logistical and financial support during the field course of 2011.

References

  1. Alongi DM (2002) Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ Conserv 29:331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aracruz, Prefeitura Municipal de (2016) Atrações turísticas; Rio Piraquê-Açu. http://www.aracruz.es.gov.br/turismo/atracoes-turisticas/14/. Accessed 23 Nov 2016
  3. Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81:169–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernini E, Rezende CE (2004) Estrutura da vegetação em florestas de mangue do estuário do rio Paraíba do Sul, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Acta Bot Bras 18:491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger DM, Delitti WBC (2010) Modelos preditores da fitomassa aérea da Floresta Baixa de Restinga. Rev Bras Bot 33:143–153Google Scholar
  6. Carvalho LC, Fonseca SM (2004) Quantificação da biomassa e do carbono em Rhizophora mangle, Avicennia schaueriana e Laguncularia racemosa no manguezal da laguna de Itaipu, Niterói-RJ. In: VI Simpósio de Ecossistemas Brasileiros, São José dos Campos. Anais... INPA 1:1–8Google Scholar
  7. Cuzzuol GRF, Campos A (2001) Aspectos nutricionais na vegetação de manguezal do estuário do Rio Mucuri, Bahia, Brasil. Rev Bras Bot 24:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M (2011) Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci 4:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fromard F, Puif H, Mougin E, Marty G, Betoulle JL, Cadamuro L (1998) Structure, above-ground biomass and dynamics of mangrove ecosystems: new data from French Guiana. Oecol 115:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Kathiresan K (2012) Importance of mangrove ecosystem. Int J Mar Sci 10:70–89Google Scholar
  12. Kathiresan K, Bingham BL (2001) Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems. Adv Mar Biol 40:81–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kathiresan K, Anduraj R, Gomathi V, Saravanakumar K (2013) Carbon sequestration potential of Rhizophora mucronata and Avicennia marina as influenced by age, season, growth and sediment characteristics in southeast coast of India. J Coast Conserv 17:397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kauffman JB, Heider C, Norfolk J, Payton F (2014) Carbon stocks of intact mangroves and carbon emissions arising from their conversion in the Dominican Republic. Ecol Appl 24:518–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Komiyama A, Poungparn S, Kato S (2005) Common allometric equations for estimating the tree weight of mangroves. J Trop Ecol 21:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Komiyama A, Ong JE, Poungparn S (2008) Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat Bot 89:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lacerda LD (1998) Trace metals biogeochemistry and diffuse pollution in mangrove ecosystems. International Society for Mangrove Ecosystem. Japan, 65 pGoogle Scholar
  18. Larcher W (2000) Ecofisiologia Vegetal. Prado CHBA (trad) RiMA Artes e Textos, São Carlos 531 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee SY, Primavera JH, Dahdouh-Guebas F et al (2014) Ecological role and services of tropical mangrove ecosystems: a reassessment. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:726–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu H, Ren H, Hui D, Wang W, Liao B, Cao Q (2014) Carbon stocks and potential carbon storage in the mangrove forests of China. J Environ Manag 133:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Londe V, Salles DM, Leite MGP (2013) Estrutura da vegetação de mangue associada ao gradiente de inundação no litoral norte do Espírito Santo, Brasil. Rev Arv 37:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mckee K (1993) Soil physicochemical patterns and mangrove species distribution – reciprocal effects? J Ecol 81:477–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLeod EG, Chmura GL, Bouillon S, Salm R, Bjork M, Duarte CM, Lovelock CE, Schlesinger WH, Silliman BR (2011) A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front Ecol Environ 9:552–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mumby PJ (2006) Connectivity of reef fish between mangroves and coral reefs: algorithms for the design of marine reserves at seascape scales. Biol Conserv 128:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pendleton L, Donato DC, Murray BC et al (2012) Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversions and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS One 9:e43542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  27. Ribeiro SC, Jacovine LAG, Soares CPB et al (2009) Quantification of biomass and estimation of carbon stock in a mature forest in the municipal district of Viçosa, Minas Gerais. Rev Árv 33:917–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schaeffer-Novelli Y, Cintrón G (1986) Guia para estudos de áreas de manguezal: estrutura, função e flora. Caribbean Ecological Research, São Paulo 150 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Semesi AK, Howell K (1992) The mangroves of the eastern African region. United Nations Environment Programme, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  30. Silva CA, Lacerda LD, Rezende CE (1990) Metals reservoir in a red mangrove forest. Biotropica 22:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silva MAB, Bernini E, Carmo MS (2005) Características estruturais de bosques de mangue do estuário do Rio São Mateus, ES, Brasil. Acta Bot Bras 19:465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Soares MLG (1999) Estrutura vegetal e grau de perturbação dos manguezais da Lagoa da Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Rev Bras Biol 59:503–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steinke TD, Ward CJ, Rajh A (1995) Forest structure and biomass of mangroves in the Mgeni estuary, South Africa. Hydrobiol 295:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Suguio K (1973) Introdução à sedimentologia. Edgard Blüncher, EDUSP, São Paulo 318 pGoogle Scholar
  35. Van TT, Wilson N, Thanh-Tung H, Quisthoudt K et al (2015) Changes in mangrove vegetation area and character in a war and land use change affected region of Vietnam (Mui Ca Mau) over six decades. Acta Oecol 63:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vieira SA, Alves LF, Aidar M et al (2008) Estimation of biomass and carbon stocks: the case of the Atlantic Forest. Biota Neotrop 8:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood Density Database (2015) Tree functional attributes and ecological database. http://db.worldagroforestry.org//wd. Accessed 15 Aug 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Thales da Motta Portillo
    • 1
  • Vinícius Londe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francisco Wagner Araújo Moreira
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Ecology of Tropical Biomes, Department of Biodiversity, Evolution and EnvironmentFederal University of Ouro PretoOuro PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations