Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 117–125 | Cite as

Jellyfish jelly press and jelly perception

  • Sofie Vandendriessche
  • Lies Vansteenbrugge
  • Jozefien Derweduwen
  • Hannelore Maelfait
  • Kris Hostens
Article

Abstract

Since the early 2000’s, invasions and blooms of jellyfish have been increasingly reported in scientific literature as well as in the general media. Despite this increased coverage, the global jellification issue remains unsolved due to the scarcity of extended time series. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent the main messages about jellyfish (increase, causes, threats, solutions, etc.) in the Flemish (Belgian Dutch-language) media correspond with the knowledge and perception of recreational users, tourism-related professionals and local government officials on the Belgian coast. The number of articles in the Flemish media (140) increased from <5 in 2000 to 27 in 2010, with half of them reporting on jellyfish in the Belgian Part of the North Sea. Almost 75 % of these articles reported on the causes (overfishing being mentioned as the main cause) and economic consequences of jellyfish blooms. Articles about the dramatic consequences of stinging, poisonous and non-indigenous species were also common. A questionnaire-based survey carried out on the Belgian coast in summer 2012 indicated that jelly perception is only partly driven by the general media, while personal experience seemed at least equally important as driver. Information on causes, threats, consequences and solutions for problems caused by jellyfish corresponded to a large extent with the answers given by recreational users and tourism-related professionals. Respondents generally agreed that all underlying causes of a potential jellification problem should be addressed and tackled at an international level. With keywords like “pain”, “smell” and “slime” used to describe jellyfish, they have little sympathy from most actors, and most recreational users of beaches and coastal waters are extremely careful with any type of jellyfish, especially when children are involved. Species-specific knowledge (names, ecology, stinging vs. harmless species) presented in the media is not assimilated by most recreational users or local officials, except for divers, who have a very different perception of jellyfish than most recreational users. This lack of knowledge appeared to be a key issue in perception among recreational users. As public perception is a key driver in policy decisions, integrated coastal zone management and measures should provide good and easily understandable information, for example by distributing leaflets and putting up warning signs on the beach. This will result in a better understanding and acceptance of jellyfish as well as generating high-quality data from citizen science programs. Better and more information on jellyfish will thus benefit all the actors and sectors potentially affected by jellification.

Keywords

Jellyfish Media Awareness and perception Integrated coastal zone management 

Supplementary material

11852_2016_423_MOESM1_ESM.docx (99 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 99 kb)

References

  1. Baumann S (2009) Quallen an Deutschen Ostseeküsten—Auftreten, Wahrnemung, Konsequenzen. IKZM-Oder Berichte 59. Universität Rostock ISSN 1614–6968, 213 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumann S, Schernewski G (2012) Occurrence and public perception of jellyfish along the German Baltic Coastline. J Coast Conserv 16(4):555–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter EJ, Rodger HD, McAllen R, Doyle TK (2011) Gill disorders in marine-farmed salmon: investigating the role of hydrozoan jellyfish. Aquac Environ Interact 1:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boero F (2013) Review of jellyfish blooms in the Mediterranean and Black Sea. Studies and reviews N° 92. General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. FAO. ISSN 1020–9549, 63 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnet D (2013) GELAMED—Etude du Plankton Gelatineux sur la facade Mediteranéenne. Programme Liteau, Programme 189. Rapport du synthèse. 106 pp + annexesGoogle Scholar
  6. Brodeur RD, Mills CE, Overland JE, Walters GE, Schumacher JD (1999) Evidence for a substantial increase in gelatinous zooplankton in the Bering Sea, with possible links to climate change. Fish Oceanogr 8(4):296–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brotz L, Cheung WWL, Kleisner K, Pakhomov E, Pauly D (2012) Increasing jellyfish populations: trends in large marine ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 690:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciantar M (2012) Investigating the socio-economic impact of jellyfish outbreaks in small island states. MA dissertation, University of Malta, pp 156Google Scholar
  9. Condon RH, Graham WM, Duarte CM, Pitt KA, Lucas CH, Haddock SHD, Sutherland KR, Robinson KL, Dawson MN, Decker MB, Mills CE, Purcell JE, Malej A, Mianzan H, Uye S-I, Gelcich S, Madin LP (2012) Questioning the rise of gelatinous zooplankton in the world’s oceans. Bioscience 62(2):160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gershwin LA (2013) Stung! On jellyfish blooms and the future of the ocean. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-02010-5, 456 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaneshiro-Pineiro MY (2013) Jellyfish-human interactions in North Carolina. PhD dissertation. East Carolina University. 196 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Licandro P, Conway DVP, Daly Yahia MN, Fernandez de Puelles ML, Gasparini L, Hecq JH, Tranter P, Kirby RR (2010) A blooming jellyfish in the northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. Biol Lett 6:688–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynam CP, Hay SJ, Brierley AS (2004) Interannual variability in abundance of North Sea jellyfish and links to the North Atlantic Oscillation. Limnol Oceanogr 49:637–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maes F, Schrijvers J, Vanhulle A (eds) (2005) Een zee van ruimte: naar een ruimtelijk structuurplan voor het duurzaam beheer van de Noordzee (GAUFRE). Brussels, Belgian Science Policy, 204 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Piraino S, Aglieri G, Martell L, Mazzoldi C, Melli V, Milisenda G, Scorrano S, Boero F (2014) Pelagia benovici sp. nov. (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa): a new jellyfish in the Mediterranean Sea. Zootaxa 3794:455–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Purcell J (2012) Jellyfish and ctenophore blooms coincide with human proliferations and environmental perturbations. Ann Rev Mar Sci 4:209–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Purcell JE, Uye S, Lo WT (2007) Anthropogenic causes of jellyfish blooms and direct consequences for humans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 350:153–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Richardson A, Bakun A, Hays G, Gibbons M (2009) The jellyfish joyride: causes, consequences and management responses to a more gelatinous future. Trends Ecol Evol 24(6):312–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Ginderdeuren K, Hostens K, Hoffman S, Vansteenbrugge L, Soenen K, De Blauwe H, Robbens J, Vincx M (2012) Distribution of the invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Aquat Invasion 7(2):163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. van Walraven L, Langenberg V, Dapper R, Witte JIJ, Zuur A, van der Veer HW (2014) Long-term patterns in 50 years of scyphomedusae catches in the western Dutch Wadden Sea in relation to climate change and eutrophication. J Plankton Res. doi:10.1093/plankt/fbu088 Google Scholar
  21. Vansteenbrugge L, Van Regenmortel T, De Troch M, Vincx M, Hostens K (2015) Gelatinous zooplankton in the Belgian part of the North Sea and the adjacent Schelde estuary: spatio-temporal distribution patterns and population dynamics. J Sea Res 97:28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofie Vandendriessche
    • 1
  • Lies Vansteenbrugge
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jozefien Derweduwen
    • 1
  • Hannelore Maelfait
    • 3
  • Kris Hostens
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research ILVO, Bio-environmental Research GroupOostendeBelgium
  2. 2.Marine Biology SectionGhent UniversityGentBelgium
  3. 3.Coordination Centre for Integrated Coastal Zone ManagementOostendeBelgium

Personalised recommendations