Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 339–350 | Cite as

Room to move? Threatened shorebird habitat in the path of sea level rise—dynamic beaches, multiple users, and mixed ownership: a case study from Rhode Island, USA

  • Sally Ann SimsEmail author
  • Jennifer R. Seavey
  • Charles G. Curtin
Article

Abstract

Accelerated sea level rise (slr) is expected to transform vulnerable Atlantic coastal habitats in the United States during this century. Low-elevation sandy beaches, important nesting habitat for the continued recovery of the federally threatened piping plover (Charadrius melodus) in Rhode Island, are especially vulnerable. These beaches, under a mix of private and public ownership, exist in a heterogeneous landscape of dunes, rocky headlands, salt ponds, and heavily developed areas. Understanding the extent to which piping plover nesting beaches can retreat landward under projected slr is important for prioritizing future conservation actions across multiple jurisdictions. This research examines habitat change in response to slr (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 m) under stationary and migration beach responses and whether development blocks habitat migration for five productive piping plover nesting beaches. We found that under the stationary habitat model, all beaches lose area under all slr scenarios. For the habitat migration model, future habitat availability differs by beach depending on elevation, landward topography, and presence of development. However, across the majority of beach area, piping plover habitat will be able to migrate landward if unconstrained by future development. A coalition of public and private stakeholders already supports management efforts to help ensure plover population recovery in the area. With emerging habitat change prediction tools, these stakeholders and other partners can engage in innovative, local-level planning needed to protect wildlife habitat and commercial, residential, and infrastructure assets from sea level rise.

Keywords

Sea level rise Piping plover Sandy beach Habitat migration modeling Habitat availability Landscape permeability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank The Sounds Conservancy for its grant in support of this research. We also acknowledge and thank the piping plover management personnel at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Rhode Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex office in Charlestown, RI, USA, for sharing nesting data and providing logistical assistance. Special thanks go to Dorie Stolley, Erin King, and Jessica Cressman. For guidance in modeling-related statistics, many thanks to Michael Sutherland, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. Thanks also to James Jordan, PhD, Core Faculty, Antioch University New England, Keene, NH, USA.

References

  1. Ashton AD, Donnelly JP, Evans RL (2007) A discussion of the potential impacts of climate change on the shorelines of the Northeastern USA. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13:719–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaumont LJ, Hughes L, Pitman AJ (2008) Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important? Ecol Lett. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01231.x/pdf, Accessed 18 January 2011Google Scholar
  3. bing™ Maps (2010) Map of Rhode Island. Microsoft Corporation, RedmondGoogle Scholar
  4. Boothroyd JC, Friedrich NE, McGinn SR (1985) Geology of microtidal coastal lagoons: Rhode Island. Mar Geol 63:35–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. John Wiley and Sons, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson-Arnott RGD (2005) Conceptual model of the effects of sea level rise on sandy coasts. J Coast Res 21:1166–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis R Jr, Fitzgerald D (2004) Beaches and coasts, 1st edn. Wiley-Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  8. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI®) (1999–2010) ArcMap 10.0. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CAGoogle Scholar
  9. Everitt BS, Hothorn T (2006) A handbook of statistical analyses using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Baca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fish MR, Cote IM, Gill JA, Renshoff S, Watkinson AR (2005) Predicting the impact of sea-level rise on Caribbean sea turtle nesting habitat. Conserv Biol 19:482–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fish MR, Cote IM, Horrocks JA, Mulligan B, Watkinson AR, Jones AP (2008) Construction setback regulations and sea level rise: mitigating sea turtle nesting beach loss. Ocean Coast Manag 51:330–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frumhoff PC, McCarthy JJ, Melillo JM, Moser SC, Wuebbles DJ (2007) Confronting climate change in the US Northeast: science, impacts, and solutions, synthesis report. Union of Concern Scientists, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Galbraith H, Jones R, Park R, Clough J, Herrod-Julius S, Harrington B, Page G (2002) Global climate change and sea level rise: potential losses of intertidal habitat for shorebirds. Waterbirds Int J Waterbird Biol 25:173–183Google Scholar
  14. Gilman E, Ellison J, Coleman R (2006) Assessment of mangrove response to projected relative sea-level rise and recent historical reconstruction of shoreline position. Environ Monit Assess 124:105–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Google Earth (2010) Map of Rhode Island. Google, Inc., Mountain View, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. Groves C (2003) Drafting a conservation blueprint: a practitioner’s guide to planning for biodiversity, 1st edn. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutierrez BT, Plant NG, Thieler ER (2011) A Bayesian network to predict coastal vulnerability to sea level rise. J Geophys Res 116:7F02009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haig SM, Ferland CL, Cuthbert FJ, Dingledine J, Goossen JP, Hecht A, McPhillips N (2005) A complete species census and evidence for regional declines in piping plovers. J Wildl Manag 69:160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hecht A, Melvin S (2009) Population trends of Atlantic coast piping plovers, 1986–2006. Waterbirds Int J Waterbird Biol 32:64–72Google Scholar
  20. Hecker S (2008) The piping plover as an umbrella species for the barrier beach ecosystem. In: Askins RA, Dryer GD, Visgilio GR, Whitelaw DM (eds) Saving biological diversity: balancing protection of endangered species and ecosystems. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, pp 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horton R, Herweijer C, Rosenzweig C, Liu J, Gornitz V, Ruane AC (2008) Sea level rise projections for current generation CGCMs based on the semi-empirical method. Geophys Res Lett 35, L02715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report: contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Pachauri R, Reisinger, A Core writing team (eds) IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  23. Lacey EM, Peck JA (1998) Long-term beach profile variations along the south shore of Rhode Island, USA. J Coast Res 14:1255–1264Google Scholar
  24. Mann KH (2000) Ecology of coastal waters with implications for management, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  25. Melvin SM, Griffin CR, MacIvor LH (1991) Recovery strategies for piping plovers in managed coastal landscapes. Coast Manag 19:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfeffer WT, Harper JT, O’Neel S (2008) Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st-century sea-level rise. Science 321:1340–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rahmstorf S (2010) A new view on sea level rise. Nat Rep Clim Chang 1004:44–45. doi: 10.1038/climate.2010.29, Accessed 18 July 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rahmstorf S, Cazenave A, Church JA, Hansen JE, Keeling RF, Parker DE, Somerville RCJ (2007) Recent climate observations compared to projections. Science 316:709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ray GC, McCormick-Ray J (2003) Coastal-marine conservation: science and policy. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org
  31. Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council (RICRMC) (1999) Rhode Island coastal resources management program, Rhode Island salt pond special area management plan. Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council, WakefieldGoogle Scholar
  32. Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council (RICRMC) (2008) Rhode Island coastal resources management program revised “Red Book” document from 1983. Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council, WakefieldGoogle Scholar
  33. Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council (RICRMC) (2010) Rhode Island ocean special area management plan. Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council, WakefieldGoogle Scholar
  34. Richardson K et al (2009) Climate change: global risk, challenges, and decisions–summary of the Copenhagen Climate Change Congress, International Scientific Congress Synthesis Report. International Alliance of Research Universities, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  35. Seavey JR (2009) Piping plover (Charadrius melodus) conservation on the barrier islands of New York: habitat quality and implications in a changing climate. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Seavey JR, Gilmer B, McGarigal KM (2011) Effect of sea-level rise on piping plover (Charadrius melodus) breeding habitat. Biol Conserv 144:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Solomon S, Plattner G-K, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:1704–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stolley D (2010) Climate change vulnerability assessment for shorebirds, Coastal version. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences/United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Region’s Division of Refuges. http://www.whsrn.org/tools/climate-change-tool
  39. Titus JG, Hudgens DE, Trescott DL, Craghan M, Nuckols WH, Hershner CH, Kassakian JM, Linn CJ, Merritt PG, McCue TM, O'Connell JF, Tanski J, Wang (2009) State and local governments plan for development of most land vulnerable to rising sea level along the U.S. Atlantic coast. Environ Res Lett (online) 4:044008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2007a) National coastal mapping program—orthomosaics, 2005–2007 New England JALBTCX natural color imagery. http://www.csc.noaa.gov/dataviewer/index. Accessed 27 June 2011
  41. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2007b) National coastal mapping program—Topo-Bathy LiDAR, Maine, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. http://www.csc.noaa.gov/dataviewer/index. Accessed 28 July 2011
  42. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1996) Piping plover (Charadrius melodus) Atlantic coast population revised recovery plan. USFWS Region 5, Hadley, MAGoogle Scholar
  43. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2010) Summary of egg hatching, chick survival and productivity from the United States fish and wildlife service monitored piping plover nesting sites in Rhode Island in 2010. Rhode Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex, CharlestownGoogle Scholar
  44. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2011a) Piping plover numbers continue to increase in Rhode Island. Northeast Region, Rhode Island NWR Complex, Charlestown, RI. Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/trustompond/images/News/ARS_plover2011.pdf
  45. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2011b) Abundance and productivity estimates. 2010 updates: Atlantic coast piping plover population. Sudbury, MA. Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/northeast/pipingplover/pdf/Abundance&Productivity2010Update.pdf
  46. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2011c) Summary of egg hatching, chick survival and productivity from the United States fish and wildlife service monitored piping plover nesting sites in Rhode Island in 2011. Rhode Island National Wildlife Refuge Complex, CharlestownGoogle Scholar
  47. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Northeast Region and Midwest Region (2009) Piping plover (Charadrius melodus) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. USFWS Hadley, MA, Office and East Lansing, MI, Field OfficeGoogle Scholar
  48. United States Geological Survey (USGS) and United States Department of the Interior (USDOI) (2002) Vulnerability of U.S. national parks to sea-level rise and coastal change. USGS Fact Sheet FS-095-02. September 2002Google Scholar
  49. Vermeer M, Rahmstorf S (2009) Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:21527–21532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yin J, Schlesinger ME, Stouffer RJ (2009) Model projections of rapid sea-level rise on the northeast coast of the United States. Nat Geosci 2:262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang K, Douglas BC, Leatherman SP (2004) Global warming and coastal erosion. Clim Chang 64:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sally Ann Sims
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jennifer R. Seavey
    • 2
  • Charles G. Curtin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental StudiesAntioch University New EnglandKeeneUSA
  2. 2.Seahorse Key Marine Laboratory, Department of BiologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations