Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 439–448 | Cite as

The effectiveness of coastal management web portals – a critical analysis

  • Matthias Mossbauer
  • Gerald Schernewski
  • Steffen Bock
Article

Abstract

Effective and efficient information dissemination is crucial for a successful management of coasts and beaches. Almost all coastal management activities use Internet portals to provide electronic accessibility of data and information. In this respect, we have analyzed web tracking data and costs to investigate the effectiveness and efficiency of two coastal management web portals. Indicators for the visiting quality, the volume and characteristics of the information flow and the associated costs were combined. The results show that mainly professional users were attracted by the two investigated online coastal management information offers. Furthermore, the coastal management contents were mainly relevant on regional scale. The results indicate that it is not enough to provide various information, instead it further needs also efforts to disseminate this information to a broader public. Specific preparation and presentation of information for the target groups would lead to an active dissemination process. The investigation of the costs shows that an increasing efficiency of information dissemination via the Internet goes together with the long term use of the information infrastructure. Therefore large coastal management web portals need runtimes of several years. The applied method combined and simplified actual used web analytic methods to allow valuable insights into the information dissemination of coastal management web portals. In this way the method can be used to help coastal decision makers or other practitioners to screen their web presence in the background of information supply and demand for all visitor groups they want to reach.

Keywords

Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) German Baltic coast Costs Internet 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was funded by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research within the projects IKZM-Oder III (BMBF 03F0465A), BaltCICA (Part-financed by Baltic Sea Region Programme of the European Union) and RADOST (BMBF 01LR0807).

We like to thank Inga Krämer, Stefanie Boede and Dana Weiss for many helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Aden T (2009) Google analytics – implementieren, interpretieren. Profitieren, Hauser, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  2. Arndt H (2006) Integrierte informationsarchitektur: die erfolgreiche Konzeption professioneller Websites. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock S, Schernewski G (2005) Das regionale informationssystem zur odermündungsregion. Coastline Reports 6:169–174Google Scholar
  4. Claus S, Vanhoorne B, Vanden-Berghe E, Mees J (2007) Development of the ENCORA portal: an internet based facility supporting EU-wide contact search for ICZM related science, practice, and policy communities. In: Mees J, Seys J (eds) VLIZ young scientists’ day. VLIZ Special Publication, Brugge, p 55Google Scholar
  5. Clifton B (2010) Advanced web metrics with google analytics. Wiley Publishing, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  6. Doody J (2003) Information required for integrated coastal zone management: conclusions from the European Demonstration Programme. Coast Manag 31:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2002) Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2002 concerning the implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Europe (2002/413/EC). Available via DIALOG. http://www.umweltdaten.de/rup/EU_2002_Empfehlung_IKZM_Strategie.pdf
  8. Geskou I (2003) Developing the vision: managing the coastal zone of magnesia through information and consent. Coast Manag 31:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huntington P, Nicholas D, Jamali HR, Watkinson A (2006) Obtaining subject data from log files using deep log analysis: case study OhioLINK. J Inf Sci 32:299–308. doi: 10.1177/0165551506065782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jamali HR, Nicholas D, Huntington P (2005) The use and users of scholarly e-journals: a review of log analysis studies. Aslib Proccedings 57:554–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansen J, Spink A, Taksa I (2009) Handbook of research on web log analysis. Information Science Reference, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeong M, Oh H, Gregoire M (2003) Conceptualizing Website quality and its consequences in the lodging industry. Hospit Manag 22(2):161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaushik A (2007) Web analytics: an hour a day. Wiley Publishing, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  14. Kay R, Christie P (2001) An analysis of the impact of the internet on coastal management. Coast Manag 29:157–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King S, Green D (2001) Redefining the limits of the coastal zone: bridging the gap between land and sea using remote sensing, GIS, and the internet. GeoCoast 1:1–15Google Scholar
  16. Olson S (2007) Faceoff: Google Analytics Vs. Server Logs. In: Development Seed Blog. Available via DIALOG. http://developmentseed.org/blog/analytics/faceoff_google_serverlogs
  17. O'Regan P (1996) The use of contemporary information technologies for coastal research and management: a review. J Coast Res 12:192–204Google Scholar
  18. Pather S, Erwin G, Remenyi D (2003) Measuring e-Commerce effectiveness: a conceptual model. SAICSIT 47:143–152Google Scholar
  19. Puscher F (2001) Das usability Prinzip: wege zur benutzerfreundlichen Website. Dpunkt, HeidenbergGoogle Scholar
  20. Schernewski G (2004) Von der Agenda 21 im Ostseeraum zum regionalen integrierten Küstenzonenmanagement (IKZM). Jahrbuch der Hafenbautechnischen Gesellschaft 54:132–136Google Scholar
  21. Schernewski G, Bock S (2004) Online study modules for coastal management (ikzm-d Lernen). Coastline Reports 1:163–168Google Scholar
  22. SEO (2010) Seo Traffic drosseln. Aviable via DIALOG: http://www.seo-united.de/blog/seo/seo-traffic-drosseln.htm. Accessed 08 Feb 2010
  23. Steel B, Lovrich N, Lach D, Fomenko V (2005) Correlates and consequences of public knowledge concerning ocean fisheries management. Coast Manag 33:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stolz CD (2007) Erfolgsmessung informationsorientierter Websites. Dissertation, Katholische Universität Eichstätt-IngolstadtGoogle Scholar
  25. Thamm R, Bock S, Schernewski G (2007) Regional information systems and coastal databases for ICZM in Germany – are they efficient and informative? Coastline Reports 8:151–161Google Scholar
  26. Yang Z, Cai S, Zhou Z, Zhou N (2005) Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals. Inf Manag 42:575–589Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Mossbauer
    • 1
  • Gerald Schernewski
    • 1
  • Steffen Bock
    • 1
  1. 1.Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea ResearchRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations