Sustainable livelihoods and people’s vulnerability in the face of coastal hazards

  • JC Gaillard
  • Emmanuel A. Maceda
  • Elodie Stasiak
  • Iwan Le Berre
  • Maria Victoria O. Espaldon
Article

Abstract

The present study investigates into the link between people’s vulnerability in the face of coastal hazards and sustainable livelihoods. It focuses on the town of Borongan in the Philippines and draws on questionnaire-based surveys and focus group discussions. This research shows that local fishermen are often compelled to go out fishing despite pending typhoon or storm surge to sustain the daily needs of their family. Its also demonstrates that the capacity of these people to protect themselves from the threat is constrained by poor and fragile livelihoods. In the event of a crisis, the study argues that people resort to a range of adjustments on their daily life which is rooted in the strength and diversity of their livelihoods. To reduce people’s vulnerability and enhance capacities to face coastal hazards, the study fosters Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction with special emphasis to sustainable livelihoods.

Keywords

Coastal hazards Vulnerability Capacity Sustainable livelihoods Philippines 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Field work conducted as part of this study was supported by the University of Western Brittany (France), the French Embassy in the Philippines, the Duo-France programme, Planet Risk, Eastern Samar State University and the Local Government Units of Borongan.

References

  1. Alexander B, Chan-Halbrendt C, Salim W (2006) Sustainable livelihood considerations for disaster risk management: implications for implementation of the Government of Indonesia tsunami recovery plan. Disaster Prev Manage 15(1):31–50. doi:10.1108/09653560610654220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen K (2003) Vulnerability reduction and the community-based approach. In: Pelling M (ed) Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world. Routledge, London, pp 170–184Google Scholar
  3. Allen K (2004) Building community resilience to disaster in the Philippines. In: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (ed) World disaster report: focus on community resilience. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, pp 100–119Google Scholar
  4. Anderson M, Woodrow P (1989) Rising from the ashes: development strategies in times of disasters. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  5. Bankoff G (2003) Cultures of disaster: society and natural hazard in the Philippines. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bankoff G (2004) In the eye of the storm: the social construction of the forces of nature and the climatic and seismic construction of God in the Philippines. J Southeast Asian Stud 35(1):91–111. doi:10.1017/S0022463404000050 Google Scholar
  7. Borongan Municipal Planning and Development Office (2005) Comprehensive land use plan of Borongan. Municipal Planning and Development Office, BoronganGoogle Scholar
  8. Cannon T (1994) Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of ‘natural’ disasters. In: Varley A (ed) Disasters, development and environment. Wiley, Chichester, pp 13–30Google Scholar
  9. Cannon T (2003) Vulnerability analysis, livelihoods and disasters components and variables of vulnerability: modelling and analysis for disaster risk management. Inter-American Development Bank/Instituto De Estudios Ambientales, Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, ManizalesGoogle Scholar
  10. Cannon T, Twigg J, Rowell J (2003) Social vulnerability, sustainable livelihoods and disasters. Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Department and Sustainable Livelihoods Support Office, Department for International Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Center for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters (2008) EM-DAT: the OFDA/CRED international disaster database. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain. Available via http://www.cred.be/emdat Accessed 12 June 2006
  12. Chambers R (1995) Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts? Environ Urban 7(1):173–204. doi:10.1177/095624789500700106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chambers R, Conway GR (1991) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS discussion paper 296. Institute of Development Studies, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  14. Coate B, Handmer J, Choong W (2006) Taking care of people and communities: rebuilding livelihoods through NGOs and the informal economy in Southern Thailand. Disaster Prev Manage 15(1):135–145. doi:10.1108/09653560610654293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corporación OSSO La Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina (2008) DesInventar online 8.1.9-2: sistema de inventario de efectos de desastres. Corporación OSSO/La Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina, Cali. Available via http://online.desinventar.org/ Accessed 28 April 2009
  16. Crittenden KS, Lamug CB, Nelson GL (2003) Socioeconomic influences on livelihood recovery of Filipino families experiencing recurrent lahars. Philipp Sociol Rev 51:115–134Google Scholar
  17. Danguilan-Vitug M (1993) Power from the forest: the politics of logging. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism, Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis I, Haghebeart B, Peppiatt D (2004) Social vulnerability and capacity analysis. Discussion paper and workshop report. ProVention Consortium, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  19. Delfin FG Jr, Gaillard JC (2008) Extreme vs. quotidian: addressing temporal dichotomies in Philippine disaster management. Public Adm Dev 28(3):190–199. doi:10.1002/pad.493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delica ZG (1999) Community mobilization for early warning. Philipp Plann J 30(2):30–40Google Scholar
  21. Delica-Willison Z, Willison R (2004) Vulnerability reduction: a task for the vulnerable people themselves. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 145–158Google Scholar
  22. D’Ercole R (1998) Approches de la vulnérabilité et perspectives pour une meilleure logique de réduction des risques. Pangea 29–30:20–28Google Scholar
  23. Department For International Development (1999) Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. Department For International Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Devereux S (2001) Livelihood insecurity and social protection: a re-emerging issue in rural development. Dev Policy Rev 19(4):507–519. doi:10.1111/1467-7679.00148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Devereux S (2006) Vulnerable livelihoods in Somali Region, Ethiopia. IDS research report 57. Institute of Development Studies, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  26. Eastern Samar Provincial Planning and Development Office (2004) Province of Eastern Samar socio-economic profile: where the Philippines meets the Pacific. Eastern Samar Provincial Planning and Development Office, BoronganGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaillard JC (2007) De l’origine des catastrophes: phénomènes extrêmes ou âpreté du quotidien? Nat Sci Soc 15(1):44–47. doi:10.1051/nss:2007022 Google Scholar
  28. Gaillard JC (2008) Alternative paradigms of volcanic risk perception: the case of Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):315–328. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaillard JC, Liamzon CC, Villanueva JD (2007) ‘Natural’ disaster? A retrospect into the causes of the late-2004 typhoon disaster in Eastern Luzon, Philippines. Environ Hazards 7(4):257–270. doi:10.1016/j.envhaz.2006.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gaillard JC, Pangilinan MRM, Cadag JR, Le Masson V (2008) Living with increasing floods: insights from a rural Philippine community. Disaster Prev Manage 17(3):383–395. doi:10.1108/09653560810887301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heijmans A (2004) From vulnerability to empowerment. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 115–127Google Scholar
  32. Heijmans A, Victoria LP (2001) Citizenry-based and development oriented disaster response: experiences and practices in disaster management of the citizens’ disaster response network in the Philippines. Center for Disaster Preparedness, Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  33. Hewitt K (1983) The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In: Hewitt K (ed) Interpretation of calamities. The risks and hazards series No 1. Allen & Unwin Inc, Boston, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  34. Huigen MGA, Jens IC (2006) Socio-economic impact of super typhoon Harurot in San Mariano, Isabela, the Philippines. World Dev 34(12):2116–2136. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kafle SK, Murshed Z (2006) Community-based disaster risk management for local authorities. Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelman I, Mather T (2008) Living with volcanoes: the sustainable livelihoods approach for volcano-related opportunities. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):189–198. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Korf B (2004) War, livelihoods and vulnerability in Sri Lanka. Dev Change 35(2):275–295. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00352.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Labro V, Gabieta JA (2008) Landslides, floods isolate Eastern Samar. Philippine Daily Inquirer 19 February. Available via http://media.inquirer.net Accessed 25 September 2008
  39. Lautze S, Raven-Roberts A (2006) Violence and complex humanitarian emergencies: implications for livelihoods models. Disasters 30(4):383–401Google Scholar
  40. Longley C, Maxwell D (2003) Livelihoods, chronic conflict and humanitarian response: a synthesis of current practice. Overseas Development Institute working paper 182. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Luna EM (2001) Disaster mitigation and preparedness: the case of NGOs in the Philippines. Disasters 25(3):216–226. doi:10.1111/1467-7717.00173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luna EM (2003) Endogenous system of responses to river flooding as a disaster subculture: a case study of Bula, Camarines Sur. Philipp Sociol Rev 51:135–153Google Scholar
  43. Mahmud N (2000) Flood disasters and population displacement: the case of Ormoc City, the Philippines. In: Parker DJ (ed) Floods–Vol. I. Routledge, London, pp 400–411Google Scholar
  44. Mendoza AB, Alura DP (2001) Mangrove structure on the Eastern coast of Samar island, Philippines. In: Scott DE, Mohtar RH, Steinhardt GC (eds) Sustaining the global farm? Selected papers from the 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting, May 24–29, 1999, West Lafayette. International Soil Conservation Organization / United States Department of Agriculture / Agricultural Research Service / National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory / Purdue University, West Lafayette, pp 423–425Google Scholar
  45. National Statistics Office (2008) 2007 census of population and housing. National Statistics Office, Manila. Available via http://www.census.gov.ph Accessed 25 September 2008
  46. Maskrey A (1989) Disaster mitigation: a community-based approach. Development guidelines No 3. Oxfam, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Oxfam (2005) How people are recovering their livelihoods 12 months after the tsunami. Oxfam briefing paper 84. Oxfam International, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Service Administration (2005) Tropical cyclone statistics. Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Service Administration, Quezon City. Available via http://www.pagasa.dost.gov.ph. Accessed 25 September 2008
  49. Pomeroy RS, Pido M (1995) Initiatives towards fisheries comanagement in the Philippines. Mar Policy 19(3):213–226. doi:10.1016/0308-597X(94)00008-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pomeroy RS, Berkes F (1997) Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Mar Policy 21(5):465–480. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00017-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pomeroy RS, Katon BM, Harkes I (2001) Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: lessons from Asia. Mar Policy 25:197–208. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00010-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pomeroy RS, Ratner BD, Hall SJ, Pimoljinda J, Vivekanandan V (2006) Coping with disaster: rehabilitating coastal livelihoods and communities. Mar Policy 30:786–793. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2006.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Régnier P, Neri B, Scuteri S, Miniati S (2008) From emergency relief to livelihood recovery: lessons learned from post-tsunami experiences in Indonesia and India. Disaster Prev Manage 17(3):410–429. doi:10.1108/09653560810887329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanderson D (2000) Cities, disasters and livelihoods. Environ Urban 12(2):93–102. doi:10.1177/095624780001200208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Start D, Johnson C (2004) Livelihood Options? The political economy of access, opportunity and diversification. Overseas Development Institute working paper 233. Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS working paper 72. Institute of Development Studies, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  57. Scoones I (2009) Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. J Peasant Stud 36(1): 171–196. doi:10.1080/03066150902820503.Google Scholar
  58. Sen A (1981a) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Sen A (1981b) Ingredients of famine analysis: availability and entitlement. Q J Econ 96(3):433–464. doi:10.2307/1882681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Termelo RN (1997) Managing a disaster: a case of Taal volcano island. Bureau of Emergency Assistance, Department of Social Welfare and Development, Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  61. The World Bank, National Disaster Coordinating Council (2004) Natural disaster risk management in the Philippines: enhancing poverty alleviation through disaster prevention. The World Bank / National Disaster Coordinating Council, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  62. Twigg J (2001) Sustainable livelihoods and vulnerability to disasters. Working Paper No 2. Benfield Hazard Research Centre, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Twigg J (2004) Disaster risk reduction: mitigation and preparedness in development and emergency programming. Good practice review No 9. Humanitarian Practice Network, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. United Nations Development Programme (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. United Nations Development Programme, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  65. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  66. Watts MJ, Bohle HG (1993) The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine. Prog Hum Geogr 17(1):43–67. doi:10.1177/030913259301700103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wisner B (1993) Disaster vulnerability: scale, power, and daily life. Geo-Journal 30(2):127–140. doi:10.1007/BF00808129 Google Scholar
  68. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • JC Gaillard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emmanuel A. Maceda
    • 2
  • Elodie Stasiak
    • 3
  • Iwan Le Berre
    • 4
  • Maria Victoria O. Espaldon
    • 5
  1. 1.UMR 5194 Pacte – CNRSUniversité de GrenobleGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of the Philippines DilimanQuezon CityPhilippines
  3. 3.Faculté des Géosciences et de l’EnvironnementUniversité de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  4. 4.Laboratoire GeomerUMR 6554 LETG – CNRSBrestFrance
  5. 5.School of Environmental Science and ManagementUniversity of the Philippines Los BañosLos BañosPhilippines

Personalised recommendations