Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 145–159 | Cite as

“Protecting coastal zones in the Mediterranean: an economic and regulatory analysis”

  • A. MarkandyaEmail author
  • S. Arnold
  • M. Cassinelli
  • T. Taylor
Article

Abstract

This paper examines existing measures taken to protect the coastal zones of the Mediterranean Sea and assesses their success. A summary of the main pressures facing this region is given, followed by an analysis of the legislation covering coastal zone development in ten countries: Algeria, Croatia, Egypt, France, Israel, Italy, Malta, Spain, Tunisia and Turkey. The paper finds that not all of these States have legislation specifically covering coastal zones, but there is concern in all areas that existing legislation is not working. The costs and benefits of controlling coastal development are examined. Firstly, a literature review of valuation studies identifies a range of values placed on the developed and undeveloped coastline for both users and local property owners. These values were then used in a model to evaluate policy options to control development of a stretch of coastline. The model indicates that a stricter control regime of coastal development may provide significant benefits.

Keywords

Coastal zone management Legislation Littoral Mediterranean Recreation 

Abbreviations

CAMP

Coastal Area Management Programme

CVM

Contingent Valuation Method

ICAM

Integrated Coastal Area Management Protocol

ICZM

Integrated Coastal Zone Management

PPR

Piano Paesaggistico Regionale (Regional Landscape Plan in Sardinia)

VOE

Value of Enjoyment

WTP

Willingness to Pay

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge financing of this study in the framework of the SMAP III IZCM programme. Comments from Daria Povh are gratefully acknowledged. All errors are our own.

References

  1. Abelson P, Markandya A (1985) The interpretation of capitalised hedonic prices in a dynamic environment. J Environ Ec Manage 12:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arriaza M, Cañas-Ortega JF, Cañas-Madueño JA, Ruiz-Aviles P (2004) Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan 69:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson ED, Hansen JL, Schwartz AL Jr., Smersh GT (1998) Pricing residential amenities: the value of a view. J Real Estate Finance and Ec 16(1):55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond MT, Seiler VL, Seiler MJ (2002) Residential real estate prices: a room with a view. J Real Estate Res 23(1/2):129–137Google Scholar
  5. CAMP-Israel (2000) Study on Economic and Social Value of the Seashore. Provided by PAP/RAC, Split, Croatia. MimeoGoogle Scholar
  6. Dramstad WE, Fry G, Fjellstad WJ, Skar B, Hellisksen W, Sollund M-LB, Tveit MS, Geelmuden AK, Framstad E (2001) Integrating landscape-based Values—Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan 57:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ergin A, Williams AT, Metcalf A (2006) Coastal scenery: appreciation and evaluaton. J Coastal Res 22:958–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fraser R, Spencer G (1998) The value of an ocean view: an example of hedonic property amenity valuation. Aust Geog Stud 36(1):94–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Landry CE, McConnell KE (2004) Hedonic Onsite Model of Recreation Demand. Paper presented at the Southern Economics Association 74th Annual Conference, New Orleans. 2004Google Scholar
  10. Luttik J (2000) The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape Urban Plan 48:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marzetti Dell’Aste Brandolini S (2003) Economic valuation of the recreational beach use: the Italian case-studies of Lido Di Dante, Trieste, Ostia and Pellestrina island. Final report for the DELOS project. Available online at http://www.delos.unibo.it/Docs/Deliverables/D28A.pdf Cited 19 Jan 2006
  12. Morgan R, Williams AT (1998) Video panorama assessment of beach landscape aesthetics on the coast of Wales. J Coastal Cons 5(1):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muriel T, Abdelhak N, Gildas A, Bonnieux F (2006) Evaluation des bénéfices environnementaux par la méthode des prix hédonistes: une application au cas du littoral. Paper presented at Les 1ères Rencontres du Logement de L'IDEP Marseille 19-20 October 2006Google Scholar
  14. Parsons GR, Wu Y (1991) The opportunity cost of coastal land use controls: an empirical analysis. Land Econ 67(3):308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Penning-Rowsell EC, Green CH, Thompson PM, Coker AM, Tunstall SM, Richards C, Parker DJ (1992) The Economics of Coastal Management. Belhaven, London, p 380Google Scholar
  16. Polomé P, Marzetti S, van der Veen A (2005) Economic and social demands for coastal protection. Coastal Eng 52:819–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ready R, Navrud S (2006) International benefit transfer: methods and validity tests. Ecol Econ 60(2):429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sohngen B., Lichtkoppler F, Bielen M (1999) The value of lake Erie beaches, FS-078 Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Tudorf DT, Williams AT (2003) Public perception and opinion of visible beach aesthetic pollution: the utilisation of photography. J Coastal Res 19:1104–1115Google Scholar
  20. Whitmarsh D, Northen J, Jaffry S (1999) Recreational benefits of coastal protection: a case study. Marine Policy 23(4):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Markandya
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • S. Arnold
    • 1
  • M. Cassinelli
    • 2
  • T. Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BathBathUK
  2. 2.Foundazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)MilanoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Economics and International DevelopmentUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations