Advertisement

Business networks as breeding grounds for entrepreneurial options: organizational implications

  • Alessandro Zardini
  • Francesca Ricciardi
  • Ludovico Bullini Orlandi
  • Cecilia Rossignoli
Original Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

This study proposes an original configurational view of the organizational logics of business networks. It develops a set of 18 operationalizable propositions, clustered around a typology of six networking logics, that allow to measure the extent to which each networking logic is active at the level of a specific network organization. In addition, this study leverages degree-of-freedom analysis to inductively develop a model of how different possible combinations of these six networking logics may transform networks into effective institutions for the creation, recognition, and seizing of entrepreneurial options. These contributions can be used for future larger configurational studies on network organizations as option-creating and resilience-generating institutions.

Keywords

Network organizations Real options Transactional logic Resource control logic Legitimacy logic Co-creation logic Innovation logic Commons logic 

JEL Classification

L26 Entrepreneurship 

References

  1. Ansell C (2011) Pragmatist democracy: evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett ML, King AA (2008) Good fences make good neighbors: a longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Acad Manag J 51(6):1150–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum JAC, Shipilov AV (2006) Ecological approaches to organizations. In: Sage handbook for organization studies, pp 55–110. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1017085. Accessed 18 Sept 2018
  4. Bennett J, Errewé PL (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Q 27(2):237–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bérard C, Perez M (2014) Alliance dynamics through real options: the case of an alliance between competing pharmaceutical companies. Eur Manag J 32(2):337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besharov ML, Smith WK (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad Manag Rev 39(3):364–381.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouteiller C, Karyotis C (2010) The evaluation of intangibles: introducing the optional capital. Invest Manag Financ Innov 7(4):85–92Google Scholar
  8. Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad Manag Rev 18(4):760–782.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.9402210157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryman A, Bell E (2011) Business research methods. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell DT (1975) Degrees of freedom in the case study. Comp Polit Stud 8:178–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cantele S, Vernizzi S, Ricciardi F (2016) The emerging wave of agility-oriented business networks in Italy: a new strategy for facing global competition. World Rev Entrep Manag Sustain Dev 12(2/3):270–284Google Scholar
  12. Cantino V, Devalle A, Cortese D, Ricciardi F, Longo M (2017) Place-based network organizations and embedded entrepreneurial learning: emerging paths to sustainability. Int J Entrep Behav Res 23(3):504–523.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2015-0303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chintakananda A, McIntyre DP (2014) Market entry in the presence of network effects: a real options perspective. J Manag 40(6):1535–1557Google Scholar
  14. Coff RW, Laverty KJ (2007) Real options meet organizational theory: coping with path dependencies, agency costs, and organizational form. Adv Strateg Manag 24(1):333–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907–1912.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW, Chambliss D, Collins R, Coser L, Friedkin R et al (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dougherty D, Dunne DD (2011) Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organ Sci 22(5):1214–1223.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Driouchi T, Bennett DJ (2012) Real options in management and organizational strategy: a review of decision-making and performance implications. Int J Manag Rev 14(1):39–62.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00304.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferraro F, Etzion D, Gehman J (2015) Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: robust action revisited. Organ Stud 36(3):363–390.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614563742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fiss P (2011) Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad Manag J 54(2):393–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fjeldstad OD, Snow CC, Raymond EM, Lettl C (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strateg Manag J 33(6):734–750.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenwood R, Hinings CR, Whetten D (2014) Rethinking institutions and organizations. J Manag Stud 51(7):1206–1220.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Håkansson H, Ford D, Gadde LE, Snehota I, Waluszewski A (2009) Business in networks. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Hughes M, Eggers F, Kraus S, Hughes P (2015) The relevance of slack resource availability and networking effectiveness for entrepreneurial orientation. Int J Entrep Small Bus 26(1):116–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klingebiel R, Adner R (2015) Real options logic revisited: the performance effects of alternative resource allocation regimes. Acad Manag J 58(1):221–241.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0703 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kogut B, Kulatilaka N (2001) Capabilities as Real Options. Organ Sci 12(6):744–758.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.6.744.10082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawrence TB, Hardy C, Phillips N (2002) Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: the emergence of proto-institutions. Acad Manag J 45(1):281–290Google Scholar
  30. Leiblein MJ (2003) The choice of organizational governance form and performance: predictions from transaction cost, resource-based, and real options theories. J Manag 29(6):937–961.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00085-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2014) Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Massaro M, Moro A, Aschauer E, Fink M (2017) Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks. Rev Manag Sci, 1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0247-y
  33. McGrath RG (1999) Falling forward—real options reasoning and entreprenurial failure. Acad Manag Rev 24(1):13–31.  https://doi.org/10.2307/259034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGrath RG, Ferrier WJ, Mendelow AL (2004) Real options as engines of choice and heterogeneity. Acad Manag Rev 29(1):86–101.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.11851720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer JW (2008) Reflections on institutional theories of organizations. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE (eds) The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 790–811.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pache A-CAC, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad Manag Rev 35(3):455–476Google Scholar
  37. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (2003) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  38. Pierce P, Ricciardi F, Zardini A (2017) Smart cities as organizational fields: a framework for mapping sustainability-enabling configurations. Sustainability 9(9):1–21.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ricciardi F, Zardini A, Rossignoli C (2018) Business network commons and their fragilities: emerging configurations of local organizational fields. J Bus Res. 4:5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.005 (in press, June 2017) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roig-Tierno N, Kraus S, Cruz S (2018) The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship. RMS 12(2):379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rossignoli C, Ricciardi F (2015) Inter-organizational relationships. Towards a dynamic model for understanding business network performance. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-319-11220-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rossignoli C, Ricciardi F, Bonomi S (2018) Organizing for commons-enabling decision-making under conflicting institutional logics in social entrepreneurship. Group Decis Negot 27:417–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9564-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Q 27(2):237–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schepker DJ, Oh WY, Martynov A, Poppo L (2014) The many futures of contracts: moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. J Manag 40(1):193–225.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313491289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scherpereel CM (2008) The option-creating institution: a real options perspective on economic organization. Strateg Manag J 29(5):455–470.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Short JC, Ketchen DJ, Shook CL, Ireland RD (2010) The concept of “opportunity” in entrepreneurship research: past accomplishments and future challenges. J Manag 36(1):40–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spicer A, Sewell G (2010) From national service to global player: transforming the organizational logic of a public broadcaster. J Manag Stud 47(6):913–943.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00915.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trigeorgis L, Reuer JJ (2017) Real options theory in strategic management. Strateg Manag J 38(1):42–63.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vargo SL, Maglio PP, Akaka MA (2008) On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur Manag J 26(3):145–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Woodside AG (2010) Case study research: theory, methods and practice. Emerald, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Wooten M, Hoffman AJ (2008) Organizational fields: past, present, and future. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K (eds) Handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, p 130.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversity of TurinTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations