Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 113–145 | Cite as

Did UEFA’s financial fair play harm competition in European football leagues?

  • Stephan Birkhäuser
  • Christoph KasererEmail author
  • Daniel Urban
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

When introducing UEFA’s Financial Fair Play (FFP) it was argued that as a beneficial side effect competition in European football leagues should become more equilibrated and perceived as being fairer. Based on a hand-collected dataset on league results, player market values as well as investor payments of more than 300 European football clubs, we scrutinize the impact of FFP on the competitive landscape in major European football leagues. By applying a fixed-effect panel regression difference-in-differences approach, we find results that are consistent with the view that FFP might have further amplified the competitive imbalance. This might be caused by the fact that FFP raises some barriers against the entrance of new investors. Moreover, we present evidence that FFP supports the former season’s winner in terms of budget shares in the upcoming season. Overall, our results support the view that FFP turns European football leagues less equilibrated and even tends to freeze current hierarchies.

Keywords

Football Competition Investors Inequality Financial fair play 

Mathematics Subject Classification

91C99 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Sabine Lang for outstanding research assistance.

References

  1. Bloching B, Pawlowski T (2013) How exciting are the major European football leagues? Roland Berger Strategy Consultants StudienGoogle Scholar
  2. Czarnitzki D, Stadtmann G (2002) Uncertainty of outcome versus reputation: empirical evidence for the First German Football Division. Empir Econ 27:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Andrea A, Masciandaro D (2016) Financial fair play in European football: economics and political economy—a review essay. BAFFI CAREFIN Centre Research Paper No. 2016–15Google Scholar
  4. Depken CA (1999) Free agency and the competitiveness of Major League Baseball. Rev Ind Organ 14:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fort R, Quirk J (2004) Owner objectives and competitive balance. J Sports Econ 5:20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franck E (2014) Financial fair play in European club football—what is it all about? Int J Sport Financ 3:193–217Google Scholar
  7. Gerhards J, Mutz M, Wagner GG (2014) Die Berechnung des Siegers: marktwert, Ungleichheit, Diversität und Routine als Einflussfaktoren auf die Leistung professioneller Fußballteams. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 43:231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goossens K (2006) Competitive balance in European football: comparison by adapting measures: national measure of seasonal imbalance and top 3. Rivista di Diritto ed Economia dello Sport 2:77–122Google Scholar
  9. Hamil S, Hassan D (2013) Who owns football? Models of football governance and management in international sport: the governance and management of the club game worldwide. Routledge Chapman & Hall, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirschman AO (1964) The paternity of an index. Am Econ Rev 54:761Google Scholar
  11. Humphreys B (2002) Alternative measures of competitive balance in sports leagues. J Sports Econ 3:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janssens P, Késenne S (1987) Belgian football attendances. Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management 32:305–315Google Scholar
  13. Kaplan V (2015) UEFA financial fair play regulations and European union antitrust law complications. Emory Int Law Rev 29:799–857Google Scholar
  14. Madden P (2012) Welfare economics of “financial fair play” in a sports league with benefactor owners. J Sports Econ 16:159–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Madden P (2014) Does break-even regulation of soccer clubs make sense? University of Manchester, School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 1405Google Scholar
  16. Michie J, Oughton C (2004) Competitive balance in football: Trends and effects. Football Governance Research Centre, Research Paper No. 2Google Scholar
  17. Pawlowski T (2013) Wettbewerbsintensität im Fußball: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Bedeutung für die Zuschauer. Springer Fachmedien, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Peeters T, Szymanski S (2014) Financial fair play in European football. Econ Policy 29:343–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pope P, Peel D (1989) Information, prices and efficiency in a fixed-odds betting market. Economica 56:323–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Preuss H, Haugen KK, Schubert M (2014) UEFA financial fair play: the curse of regulation. Eur J Sport Stud 2:33–51Google Scholar
  21. Roberts MR, Whited T (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. In: Constantinides G, Harris M, Stulz R (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol 2, Part A. Elsevier, pp 493–572Google Scholar
  22. Sass M (2012) Long-term competitive balance under UEFA financial fair play regulations. Working Paper No. 5/2012, Otto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgGoogle Scholar
  23. Soriano F (2014) Building a result driven organization: management lessons from the world of football. Speech at the Government Summit, Dubai, 11 Feb 2014Google Scholar
  24. Teichmann K (2007) Strategie und Erfolg von Fußballunternehmen. Springer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  25. Theil H (1967) Economics and information theory. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. UEFA (2010) UEFA club licensing and financial fair play regulations. Edition 2010Google Scholar
  27. UEFA (2012) UEFA club licensing and financial fair play regulations. Edition 2012Google Scholar
  28. UEFA (2013) The European club licensing benchmarking report financial year 2011Google Scholar
  29. UEFA (2015) UEFA club licensing and financial fair play regulations. Edition 2015Google Scholar
  30. Vöpel H (2013) Is financial fair play really justified? An economic and legal assessment of UEFA’s financial fair play rules. Hamburg Institute of International Economics Policy Paper No. 79Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Birkhäuser
    • 1
  • Christoph Kaserer
    • 2
    Email author
  • Daniel Urban
    • 3
  1. 1.Technical University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Financial Management and Capital Markets, Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS)TUM School of Management, Technical University of MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Chair of Financial Management and Capital MarketsTUM School of Management, Technical University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options