Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 33–56 | Cite as

Assessing ethical efficacy, workplace incivility, and turnover intention: a moderated-mediation model

  • Her-Ting Huang
  • Chieh-Peng LinEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Drawing upon the social cognitive theory and social identity theory, this study hypothesizes that ethical efficacy and perceived workplace incivility affect turnover intention via the full mediation of emotional exhaustion. At the same time, organizational identification is a moderator in the development of turnover intention. A field survey on 512 employees from high-tech and banking industries was conducted for empirical testing. Test results using structural equation modeling and hierarchical regression analyses reveal that emotional exhaustion fully mediates the relationship between workplace incivility and turnover intention, as well as between ethical efficacy and turnover intention. Organizational identification positively moderates the effect of workplace incivility on emotional exhaustion. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed based on the empirical findings.

Keywords

Ethical efficacy Workplace incivility Emotional exhaustion Turnover intention Social identity 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90B70 

References

  1. Ali AA, Ryan AM, Lyons BJ, Ehrhart MG, Wessel JL (2015) The long road to employment: incivility experienced by job seekers. J Appl Psychol. doi: 10.1037/apl0000055 Google Scholar
  2. Amiot CE, Terry DJ, Jimmieson NL, Callan VJ (2006) A longitudinal investigation of coping processes during a merger: implications for job satisfaction and organizational identification. J Manag 32(4):552–574Google Scholar
  3. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411Google Scholar
  4. Andersson LM, Pearson CM (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad Manag Rev 24(3):452–471Google Scholar
  5. Aquino K, Lewis MU, Bradfield M (1999) Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: a proposed model and empirical test. J Organ Behav 20:1073–1091Google Scholar
  6. Ashforth BE, Anand V (2003) The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res Organ Behav 25:1–52Google Scholar
  7. Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH (1993) Emotional labor in service roles: the influence of identity. Acad Manag Rev 18(1):80–115. doi: 10.2307/258824 Google Scholar
  8. Ashforth BE, Harrison SH, Corley KG (2008) Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. J Manag 34(3):325–374. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316059 Google Scholar
  9. Bandura A (1973) Aggression: a social learning analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  10. Bandura A (1991) Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. Handb Moral Behav Dev 1:45–103Google Scholar
  11. Bandura A (1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ Psychol 28(2):117–148Google Scholar
  12. Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2:1–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 Google Scholar
  13. Bandura A, Locke EA (2003) Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J Appl Psychol 88(1):87–99. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87 Google Scholar
  14. Bandura A, Cioffi D, Taylor CB, Brouillard ME (1988) Perceived self-efficacy in coping with cognitive stressors and opioid activation. J Pers Soc Psychol 55(3):479–488. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.479 Google Scholar
  15. Bandura A, Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Pastorelli C, Regalia C (2001) Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(1):125–135. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.125 Google Scholar
  16. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173Google Scholar
  17. Cameron AF, Webster J (2011) Relational outcomes of multicommunicating: integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organ Sci 22(3):754–771. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0540 Google Scholar
  18. Chang S, van Witteloostuijn A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J Int Bus Stud 41(2):178–184Google Scholar
  19. Chen ML, Lin CP (2013) Assessing the effects of cultural intelligence on team knowledge sharing from a socio-cognitive perspective. Hum Resour Manag 52(5):675–695Google Scholar
  20. Chen ML, Lin CP (2014) Modelling perceived corporate citizenship and psychological contracts: a mediating mechanism of perceived job efficacy. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 23(2):231–247Google Scholar
  21. Chou C-K, Chen M-L (2016) A qualitative study on perceived value and loyalty: a moderated-mediation framework. Corp Manag Rev 36(2):105–122Google Scholar
  22. Chou C, Yang K-P, Chiu Y-J (2016) Coupled open innovation and innovation performance outcomes: roles of absorptive capacity. Corp Manag Rev 36(1):37–68Google Scholar
  23. Cole MS, Bernerth JB, Walter F, Holt DT (2010) Organizational justice and individuals’ withdrawal: unlocking the influence of emotional exhaustion. J Manag Stud 47(3):367–390Google Scholar
  24. Corley KG, Harquail CV, Pratt MG, Glynn MA, Fiol CM, Hatch MJ (2006) Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. J Manag Inquiry 15(2):85–99Google Scholar
  25. Cortina LM (2008) Unseen injustice: incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):55–75. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2008.27745097 Google Scholar
  26. Cortina LM, Magley VJ, Williams JH, Langhout RD (2001) Incivility in the workplace: incidence and impact. J Occup Health Psychol 6(1):64–80. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64 Google Scholar
  27. Cortina LM, Kabat-Farr D, Leskinen EA, Huerta M, Magley VJ (2013) Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations: evidence and impact. J Manag 39(6):1579–1605. doi: 10.1177/0149206311418835 Google Scholar
  28. DeConinck JB (2011) The effects of ethical climate on organizational identification, supervisory trust, and turnover among salespeople. J Bus Res 64(6):617–624. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.06.014 Google Scholar
  29. DelBrio EB, Hernández-Maestro RM, Yoshikawa T (2017) How does interpersonal justice affect outside directors’ governance behavior? A cross-cultural comparison. Rev Manag Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11846-017-0227-2 Google Scholar
  30. Dysvik A, Kuvaas B (2013) Perceived job autonomy and turnover intention: the moderating role of perceived supervisor support. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 22(5):563–573. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.667215 Google Scholar
  31. Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods 12(1):1–22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1 Google Scholar
  32. Epitropaki O (2013) A multi-level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: testing a moderated-mediated model. J Organ Behav 34(1):65–86Google Scholar
  33. Evans WR, Davis W (2014) Corporate citizenship and the employee: an organizational identification perspective. Hum Perform 27(2):129–146. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2014.882926 Google Scholar
  34. Evans-Palmer T (2015) Humor and self-efficacy traits that support the emotional well-being of educators. J Res Innov Teach 8(1):20–34Google Scholar
  35. Fisher RJ (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res 20(2):303–315. doi: 10.1086/209351 Google Scholar
  36. Flood PC, Turner T, Ramamoorthy N, Pearson J (2001) Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industries. Int J Hum Resour Manag 12(7):1152–1165. doi: 10.1080/09585190110068368 Google Scholar
  37. Grappi S, Romani S, Bagozzi RP (2013) Consumer response to corporate irresponsible behavior: moral emotions and virtues. J Bus Res 66(10):1814–1821. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.002 Google Scholar
  38. Green AE, Miller EA, Aarons GA (2013) Transformational leadership moderates the relationship between emotional exhaustion and turnover intention among community mental health providers. Community Ment Health J 49(4):373–379Google Scholar
  39. Greenbaum RL, Quade MJ, Mawritz MB, Kim J, Crosby D (2014) When the customer is unethical: the explanatory role of employee emotional exhaustion onto work-family conflict, relationship conflict with coworkers, and job neglect. J Appl Psychol 99(6):1188–1203. doi: 10.1037/a0037221 Google Scholar
  40. Grusec JE (1992) Social learning theory and developmental psychology: the legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura. Dev Psychol 28(5):776–786Google Scholar
  41. Halbesleben JRB, Bowler WM (2007) Emotional exhaustion and job performance: the mediating role of motivation. J Appl Psychol 92(1):93–106. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.93 Google Scholar
  42. Hannah ST, Avolio BJ (2010) Moral potency: building the capacity for character-based leadership. Consult Psychol J Pract Res 62(4):291–310. doi: 10.1037/a0022283 Google Scholar
  43. Hannah ST, Avolio BJ, May DR (2011) Moral maturation and moral conation: a capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Acad Manag Rev 36(4):663–685. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0128 Google Scholar
  44. Harris GE, Cameron JE (2005) Multiple dimensions of organizational identification and commitment as predictors of turnover intentions and psychological well-being. Can J Behav Sci 37(3):159–169Google Scholar
  45. He H, Brown AD (2011) Organizational identity and organizational identification: a review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group Org Manag 38(1):3–35. doi: 10.1177/1059601112473815 Google Scholar
  46. He H, Brown AD (2013) Organizational identity and organizational identification a review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group Organ Manag 38(1):3–35. doi: 10.1177/1059601112473815 Google Scholar
  47. Hunter ST (2012) (Un) ethical leadership and identity: what did we learn and where do we go from here? J Bus Ethics 107(1):79–87Google Scholar
  48. James K, Lovato C, Khoo G (1994) Social identity correlates of minority workers’ health. Acad Manag J 37(2):383–396. doi: 10.2307/256834 Google Scholar
  49. Jimmieson NL, Terry DJ, Callan VJ (2004) A longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organizational change: the role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy. J Occup Health Psychol 9(1):11–27Google Scholar
  50. Joe SW, Tsai YH, Lin CP, Ma HC, Chiu CK (2016) Assessing perceived value: moderating effects of susceptibility to brand prestige and susceptibility to normative influence. Rev Manag Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11846-016-0203-2 Google Scholar
  51. Kashyap V, Rangnekar S (2016) Servant leadership, employer brand perception, trust in leaders and turnover intentions: a sequential mediation model. Rev Manag Sci 10(3):437–461. doi: 10.1007/s11846-014-0152-6 Google Scholar
  52. Kraśnicka T, Głód W, Wronka-Pośpiech M (2017) Management innovation, pro-innovation organisational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect. Rev Manag Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11846-017-0229-0 Google Scholar
  53. Kumar Mishra S, Bhatnagar D (2010) Linking emotional dissonance and organizational identification to turnover intention and emotional well-being: a study of medical representatives in India. Hum Resour Manag 49(3):401–419Google Scholar
  54. Leavitt K, Reynolds SJ, Barnes CM, Schilpzand P, Hannah ST (2012) Different hats, different obligations: plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments. Acad Manag J 55(6):1316–1333. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.1023 Google Scholar
  55. Leiter MP, Laschinger HKS, Day A, Oore DG (2011) The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. J Appl Psychol 96(6):1258–1274. doi: 10.1037/a0024442 Google Scholar
  56. Lim S, Cortina LM, Magley VJ (2008) Personal and workgroup incivility: impact on work and health outcomes. J Appl Psychol 93(1):95–107. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95 Google Scholar
  57. Liou F-M, Tsai Y-H (2016) Latent trajectories of competitive heterogeneity: bridging the gap in theories between persistent performance and value creation. Corp Manag Rev 36(1):1–36Google Scholar
  58. Liu Y, Zhao S, Li R, Zhou L, Tian F (2016) The relationship between organizational identification and internal whistle-blowing: the joint moderating effects of perceived ethical climate and proactive personality. Rev Manag Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11846-016-0214-z Google Scholar
  59. Llorens S, Schaufeli W, Bakker A, Salanova M (2007) Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Comput Hum Behav 23(1):825–841Google Scholar
  60. Lu CQ, Siu OL, Cooper CL (2005) Managers’ occupational stress in China: the role of self-efficacy. Personal Individ Differ 38(3):569–578. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.012 Google Scholar
  61. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivar Behav Res 39(1):99–128Google Scholar
  62. Mael F, Ashforth BE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav 13:103–123Google Scholar
  63. Maslach C, Jackson SE (1981) The measurement of experienced burnout. J Occup Behav 2:99–113. doi: 10.1002/job.4030020205 Google Scholar
  64. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP (1996) Maslach burnout inventory: manual, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  65. Miner KN, Settles IH, Pratt-Hyatt JS, Brady CC (2012) Experiencing incivility in organizations: the buffering effects of emotional and organizational support. J Appl Soc Psychol 42(2):340–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00891.x Google Scholar
  66. Mitchell MS, Palmer NF (2010) The managerial relevance of ethical efficacy. In: Schminke M (ed) Managerial ethics: managing the psychology of morality. Routledge, New York, pp 89–108Google Scholar
  67. Nelson JK, Poms LW, Wolf PP (2012) Developing efficacy beliefs for ethics and diversity management. Acad Manag Learn Educ 11(1):49–68. doi: 10.5465/amle.2009.0115 Google Scholar
  68. Park Y, Fritz C, Jex SM (2015) Daily cyber incivility and distress: the moderating roles of resources at work and home. J Manag. doi: 10.1177/0149206315576796 Google Scholar
  69. Penney LM, Spector PE (2005) Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): the moderating role of negative affectivity. J Organ Behav 26(7):777–796. doi: 10.1002/job.336 Google Scholar
  70. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Google Scholar
  71. Porath CL, Pearson CM (2012) Emotional and behavioral responses to workplace incivility and the impact of hierarchical status. J Appl Soc Psychol 42(1):326–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01020.x Google Scholar
  72. Porath C, Pearson C (2013) The price of incivility. Harv Bus Rev 91(1–2):114–121. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2013.767923 Google Scholar
  73. Porath C, MacInnis D, Folkes V (2010) Witnessing incivility among employees: effects on consumer anger and negative inferences about companies. J Consum Res 37(2):292–303. doi: 10.1086/651565 Google Scholar
  74. Pyöriä P (2005) The concept of knowledge work revisited. J Knowl Manag 9(3):116–127. doi: 10.1108/13673270510602818 Google Scholar
  75. Rayner C (2002) Round two! Redefining bullying at work. Paper presented at The Academy of Management Meeting 2002: Building Effective Networks, DenverGoogle Scholar
  76. Reich TC, Hershcovis MS (2015) Observing workplace incivility. J Appl Psychol 100(1):203–215Google Scholar
  77. Richter AW, West MA, Van Dick R, Dawson JF (2006) Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations. Acad Manag J 49(6):1252–1269Google Scholar
  78. Rimm H, Jerusalem M (1999) Adaptation and validation of an estonian version of the general self-efficacy scale (ESES). Anxiety Stress Coping 12(3):329–345. doi: 10.1080/10615809908250481 Google Scholar
  79. Robinson SL, Wang W, Kiewitz C (2014) Coworkers behaving badly: the impact of coworker deviant behavior upon individual employees. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 1(1):123–143Google Scholar
  80. Sakurai K, Jex SM (2012) Coworker incivility and incivility targets’ work effort and counterproductive work behaviors: the moderating role of supervisor social support. J Occup Health Psychol 17(2):150–161. doi: 10.1037/a0027350 Google Scholar
  81. Santhanam N, Kamalanabhan TJ, Dyaram L, Ziegler H (2015) Examining the moderating effects of organizational identification between human resource practices and employee turnover intentions in Indian hospitality industry. GSTF Bus Rev 4(1):11–19Google Scholar
  82. Schat AC, Kelloway EK (2000) Effects of perceived control on the outcomes of workplace aggression and violence. J Occup Health Psychol 5(3):386–402. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.386 Google Scholar
  83. Schaubroeck J, Merrit DE (1997) Divergent effects of job control on coping with work stressors: the key role of self-efficacy. Acad Manag J 40(3):738–754. doi: 10.2307/257061 Google Scholar
  84. Schaubroeck J, Lam SS, Xie JL (2000) Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: a cross-cultural study. J Appl Psychol 85(4):512–525. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.512 Google Scholar
  85. Schilpzand P, De Pater IE, Erez A (2016) Workplace incivility: a review of the literature and agenda for future research. J Organ Behav 37:57–88. doi: 10.1002/job Google Scholar
  86. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (2010) The general self-efficacy scale (GSE). Anxiety Stress Coping 12:329–345Google Scholar
  87. Sguera F, Bagozzi RP, Huy QN, Boss RW, Boss DS (2016) Curtailing the harmful effects of workplace incivility: the role of structural demands and organization-provided resources. J Vocat Behav 95–96:115–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2016.08.004 Google Scholar
  88. Shropshire J, Kadlec C (2013) A multi-level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: testing a moderated-mediated model. J Organ Behav 34:65–86. doi: 10.1002/job Google Scholar
  89. Sidle SD (2009) Workplace incivility: how should employees and managers respond? Acad Manag Perspect 23(4):88–89. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2009.45590142 Google Scholar
  90. Smith KENG, Collins CJ, Clark KD, Smith KENG (2005) Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad Manag J 48(2):346–357Google Scholar
  91. Taylor SG, Bedeian AG, Cole MS, Zhang Z (2014) Developing and testing a dynamic model of workplace incivility change. J Manag. doi: 10.1177/0149206314535432 Google Scholar
  92. Torkelson E, Holm K, Backstrom M, Schad E (2016) Factors contributing to the perpetration of workplace incivility: the importance of organizational aspects and experiencing incivility from others. Work Stress 30(2):115–131. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2016.1175524 Google Scholar
  93. Ugwu LI, Enwereuzor IK, Orji EU (2016) Is trust in leadership a mediator between transformational leadership and in-role performance among small-scale factory workers? Rev Manag Sci 10(4):629–648. doi: 10.1007/s11846-015-0170-z Google Scholar
  94. Umphress EE, Bingham JB, Mitchell MS (2010) Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Appl Psychol 95(4):769–780Google Scholar
  95. Van Dick R, Christ O, Stellmacher J, Wagner U, Ahlswede O, Grubba C, Hauptmeier M, Höhfeld C, Moltzen K, Tissington PA (2004) Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. Br J Manag 15(4):351–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00424.x Google Scholar
  96. Van Dick R, van Knippenberg D, Kerschreiter R, Hertel G, Wieseke J (2008) Interactive effects of work group and organizational identification on job satisfaction and extra-role behavior. J Vocat Behav 72(3):388–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.009 Google Scholar
  97. Walumbwa FO, Hartnell CA (2011) Understanding transformational leadership– employee performance links: the role of relational identification and self-efficacy. J Occup Organ Psychol 84(March):153–172. doi: 10.1348/096317910X485818 Google Scholar
  98. Walumbwa FO, Mayer DM, Wang P, Wang H, Workman K, Christensen AL (2011) Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: the roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 115(2):204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.002 Google Scholar
  99. Wegge J, Van Dick R, Fisher GK, Wecking C, Moltzen K (2006) Work motivation, organizational identification, and well-being in call centre work. Work Stress 20(1):60–83. doi: 10.1080/02678370600655553 Google Scholar
  100. Wright TA, Cropanzano R (1998) Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. J Appl Psychol 83(3):486–493. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.486 Google Scholar
  101. Yao C-Y, Shang SSC, Yu Y-C (2016) The retention of customer relationships after mergers and acquisitions. Corp Manag Rev 36(2):65–104Google Scholar
  102. Youssef CM, Luthans F (2005) A positive organizational behavior approach to ethical performance. In: Giacalone RA, Jurkiewicz CL, Dunn C (eds) Positive psychology in business ethics and corporate responsibility. Information Age, Greenwich, pp 1–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Business and ManagementNational Chiao Tung UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations