Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 1–31 | Cite as

Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management

  • Unai ArzubiagaEmail author
  • Amaia Maseda
  • Txomin Iturralde
Original Paper

Abstract

Drawing on innovation and family business literature, this study examines the largely overlooked family effect in exploratory and exploitative innovation–performance processes via the moderating impact of the family firm image and family involvement in the top management team (TMT). Based on a sample of 91 Spanish small and medium family firms (family SMEs), our results show some interesting findings. First, we find that while family firm image is beneficial to the exploitative innovation–firm performance relationship, it has a negative impact on the exploratory innovation–performance link. Second, we find that different forms of family involvement in the TMT have different effects on the results of exploratory and exploitative innovation processes. A higher proportion of family members in the TMT negatively impacts the positive effect that both exploratory and exploitative innovation have on firm performance. We also find that a higher number of generations involved in the TMT has a positive effect on exploratory innovation–firm performance, but a detrimental effect on exploitative innovation–firm performance. Thus, our study deepens the current understanding of exploratory and exploitative innovation in family SMEs, highlighting previously overlooked effects of family firm image and two forms of family involvement in the TMT on exploration– and exploitation–firm performance relationships. Furthermore, our findings have meaningful managerial implications for the development of an attractive family firm image and an effective TMT composition in order to improve the outcomes of exploratory and exploitative innovation processes.

Keywords

Exploratory innovation Exploitative innovation Family business Family firm image Family involvement in management Firm performance 

JEL Classification

L25 L26 O31b 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We highly appreciate the financial support received from the Family Business Centre of the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU for financial support (DFB/BFA and European Social Fund). This research has received financial support from the UPV/EHU (Project UPV/EHU 12/22).

References

  1. Alexiev AS, Jansen JJ, Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2010) Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: the moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. J Manage Stud 47(7):1343–1364Google Scholar
  2. Allison TH, McKenny AF, Short JC (2013) Integrating time into family business research: using random coefficient modeling to examine temporal influences on family firm ambidexterity. Fam Bus Rev 27(1):20–34Google Scholar
  3. Andersén J (2015) The absorptive capacity of family firms: how familiness affects potential and realized absorptive capacity. J Fam Bus Manag 5(1):73–89Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Marketing Res 14:396–402Google Scholar
  5. Arosa B, Iturralde T, Maseda A (2010) Ownership structure and firm performance in non-listed firms: evidence from Spain. J Fam Bus Strategy 1(2):88–96Google Scholar
  6. Arregle JL, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG, Very P (2007) The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms. J Manage Stud 44(1):73–95Google Scholar
  7. Astrachan JH, Klein SB, Smyrnios KX (2002) The F-PEC scale of family influence: a proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Fam Bus Rev 15(1):45–58Google Scholar
  8. Azim MI (2012) Corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on company performance: a structural equation model analysis. Aust J Manage 37(3):481–505Google Scholar
  9. Barkema HG, Shvyrkov O (2007) Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strategic Manage J 28(7):663–680Google Scholar
  10. Basco R (2013) The family’s effect on family firm performance: a model testing the demographic and essence approaches. J Fam Bus Strategy 4(1):42–66Google Scholar
  11. Basco R (2014) Exploring the influence of the family upon firms performance: does strategic behaviour matter? Int Small Bus J 32:967–995Google Scholar
  12. Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad Manage Rev 28(2):238–256Google Scholar
  13. Block JH, Jaskiewicz P, Miller D (2011) Ownership versus management effects on performance in family and founder companies: a Bayesian reconciliation. J Fam Bus Strategy 2(4):232–245Google Scholar
  14. Boisvert J, Burton S (2011) Towards a better understanding of factors affecting transfer of brand associations. J Consum Mark 28(1):57–66Google Scholar
  15. Brannon DL, Wiklund J, Haynie JM (2013) The varying effects of family relationship in entrepreneurial teams. Entrep Theory Pract 37(1):107–132Google Scholar
  16. Brettel M, Rottenberger JD (2013) Examining the link between entrepreneurial orientation and learning processes in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Small Bus Manage 51(4):471–490Google Scholar
  17. Burgelman RA, Hitt MA (2007) Entrepreneurial actions, innovation, and appropriability. Strateg Entrep J 1(3–4):349–352Google Scholar
  18. Buyl T, Boone C, Hendriks W, Matthyssens P (2011) Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of CEO characteristics. J Manage Stud 48(1):151–177Google Scholar
  19. Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56(2):81–91Google Scholar
  20. Capital FS (2009) Family capital, family business and free enterprise. Fam Bus Rev 22(3):193–195Google Scholar
  21. Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment, vol 17. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  22. Carnes CM, Ireland RD (2013) Familiness and innovation: resource bundling as the missing link. Entrep Theory Pract 37(6):1399–1419Google Scholar
  23. Casillas JC, Moreno AM, Barbero JL (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: family and environmental dimensions. J Fam Bus Strategy 2(2):90–100Google Scholar
  24. Chesbrough H (2003) The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. Calif Manage Rev 45(3):33–58Google Scholar
  25. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation. Mod Methods Bus Res 295(2):295–336Google Scholar
  26. Chirico F, Sirmon DG, Sciascia S, Mazzola P (2011) Resource orchestration in family firms: investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance. Strateg Entrep J 5(4):307–326Google Scholar
  27. Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Sharma P (2005) Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrep Theory Pract 29(5):555–576Google Scholar
  28. Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, De Massis A, Frattini F, Wright M (2015) The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. J Prod Innovat Manag 32(3):310–318Google Scholar
  29. Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 23(4):19–39Google Scholar
  30. Classen N, Van Gils A, Bammens Y, Carree M (2012) Accessing resources from innovation partners: the search breadth of family SMEs. J Small Bus Manage 50(2):191–215Google Scholar
  31. Classen N, Carree M, Van Gils A, Peters B (2014) Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Bus Econ 42(3):595–609Google Scholar
  32. Cohen WM (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In: Hall BN, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 129–213Google Scholar
  33. Colombo MG, Franzoni C, Rossi-Lamastra C (2015) Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract 39(1):75–100Google Scholar
  34. Cooper MJ, Upton N, Seaman S (2005) Customer relationship management: a comparative analysis of family and nonfamily business practices. J Small Bus Manage 43(3):242–256Google Scholar
  35. Craig JB, Dibrell C, Davis PS (2008) Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. J Small Bus Manage 46(3):351–371Google Scholar
  36. Cruz C, Nordqvist M (2012) Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: a generational perspective. Small Bus Econ 38(1):33–49Google Scholar
  37. Danneels E (2003) Tight–loose coupling with customers: the enactment of customer orientation. Strategic Manage J 24(6):559–576Google Scholar
  38. Dawes J (2008) Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? Int J Market Res 50(1):61–104Google Scholar
  39. Dawson A, Mussolino D (2014) Exploring what makes family firms different: discrete or overlapping constructs in the literature? J Fam Bus Strategy 5(2):169–183Google Scholar
  40. De Clercq D, Belausteguigoitia I (2015) Intergenerational strategy involvement and family firms’ innovation pursuits: the critical roles of conflict management and social capital. J Fam Bus Strategy 6(3):178–189Google Scholar
  41. De Clercq D, Dimov D, Thongpapanl NT (2010) The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. J Bus Ventur 25(1):87–103Google Scholar
  42. De Massis A, Frattini F, Lichtenthaler U (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: present debates and future directions. Fam Bus Rev 26(1):10–31Google Scholar
  43. De Massis A, Kotlar J, Chua JH, Chrisman JJ (2014) Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: implications for theory and empirical studies. J Small Bus Manage 52(2):344–364Google Scholar
  44. De Massis A, Di Minin A, Frattini F (2015a) Family-driven innovation. Calif Manage Rev 58(1):5–19Google Scholar
  45. De Massis A, Frattini F, Pizzurno E, Cassia L (2015b) Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: an exploratory analysis. J Small Bus Manage 53(1):1–36Google Scholar
  46. De Massis A, Kotlar J, Frattini F, Chrisman JJ, Nordqvist M (2016) Family governance at work organizing for new product development in family SMEs. Fam Bus Rev 29(2):189–213Google Scholar
  47. Deephouse DL, Jaskiewicz P (2013) Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional walth and social identity theories. J Manag Stud 50(3):337–360Google Scholar
  48. Dess GG, Robinson RB (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strateg Manage J 5(3):265–273Google Scholar
  49. Diéguez-Soto J, López-Delgado P, Rojo-Ramírez A (2015) Identifying and classifying family businesses. Rev Manag Sci 9(3):603–634Google Scholar
  50. Discua-Cruz A, Howorth C, Hamilton E (2013) Intrafamily entrepreneurship: the formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrep Theory Prac 37(1):17–46Google Scholar
  51. Dyer WG (2003) The family: the missing variable in organizational research. Entrep Theory Pract 27:401–416Google Scholar
  52. Dyer WG, Whetten DA (2006) Family firms and social responsibility: preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrep Theory Pract 30(6):785–802Google Scholar
  53. Ensley MD, Pearson AW (2005) An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepr Theory Pract 29(3):267–284Google Scholar
  54. Falk RF, Miller NB (1992) A primer for soft modelling. University of Akron Press, AkronGoogle Scholar
  55. Fombrun C, Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad Manage J 33(2):233–258Google Scholar
  56. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50Google Scholar
  57. Fukuyama F (1996) Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. García-Álvarez E, López-Sintas J, Gonzalvo PS (2002) Socialization patterns of successors in first-to second-generation family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 15(3):189–203Google Scholar
  59. Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 4(7):1–77Google Scholar
  60. Geisser S (1975) The predictive sample reuse method with applications. J Am Stat Assoc 70(350):320–328Google Scholar
  61. George G (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Acad Manage J 48(4):661–676Google Scholar
  62. Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manage J 47(2):209–226Google Scholar
  63. Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Acad Manage Rev 30(4):777–798Google Scholar
  64. Goel S, Jones RJ (2016) Entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation in family business: a systematic review and future directions. Fam Bus Rev 29(1):94–120Google Scholar
  65. Grewal R, Chakravarty A, Saini A (2010) Governance mechanisms in business-to-business electronic markets. J Marketing 74(4):45–62Google Scholar
  66. Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad Manag J 49:693–706Google Scholar
  67. Güttel WH, Konlechner SW, Trede JK (2015) Standardized individuality versus individualized standardization: the role of the context in structurally ambidextrous organizations. Rev Manag Sci 9(2):261–284Google Scholar
  68. Habbershon TG, Williams M, MacMillan IC (2003) A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. J Bus Ventur 18(4):451–465Google Scholar
  69. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Market Sci 40:414–433Google Scholar
  70. Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad Manage Rev 32(2):334–343Google Scholar
  71. Harman HH (1967) Modem factor analysis. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  72. He Z, Wong P (2004) Exploration versus exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ Sci 15(4):481–494Google Scholar
  73. Heavey C, Simsek Z (2013) Top management compositional effects on corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating role of perceived technological uncertainty. J Prod Innovat Manage 30(5):837–855Google Scholar
  74. Henseler J, Ringle C, Sinkovics R (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Mar 20:277–319Google Scholar
  75. Hiebl MRW (2013) Risk aversion in family firms: what do we really know? J Risk Finance 14(1):49–70Google Scholar
  76. Hiebl MRW (2015) Family involvement and organizational ambidexterity in later-generation family businesses: a framework for further investigation. Manage Decis 53(5):1061–1082Google Scholar
  77. Hofstede GH, Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  78. Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg Manage J 20(2):195–204Google Scholar
  79. Huybrechts J, Voordeckers W, Lybaert N, Vandemaele S (2011) The distinctiveness of family-firm intangibles: a review and suggestions for future research. J Manag Organ 17(2):268–287Google Scholar
  80. Inkpen A, Tsang EW (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad Manage Rev 30(1):146–165Google Scholar
  81. Jensen MB, Johnson B, Lorenz E, Lundvall BA (2007) Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Res Policy 36(5):680–693Google Scholar
  82. Kammerlander N, Burger D, Fust A, Fueglistaller U (2015) Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: the effect of CEOs’ regulatory focus. J Bus Ventur 30(4):582–602Google Scholar
  83. Kashmiri S, Mahajan V (2010) What’s in a name? An analysis of the strategic behavior of family firms. Int J Res Mark 27(3):271–280Google Scholar
  84. Kellermanns FW, Eddleston KA (2006) Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: a family perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 30(6):809–830Google Scholar
  85. Kleijnen M, Lee N, Wetzels M (2009) An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. J Econ Psychol 30:344–357Google Scholar
  86. Klein SB, Astrachan JH, Smyrnios KX (2005) The F-PEC scale of family influence: construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrep Theory Pract 29(3):321–339Google Scholar
  87. Kollmann T, Stöckmann C (2014) Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: the mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrep Theory Pract 38(5):1001–1026Google Scholar
  88. König A, Kammerlander N, Enders A (2013) The family innovator’s dilemma: how family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Acad Manage Rev 38(3):418–441Google Scholar
  89. Kortmann S (2014) The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity-oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity. J Prod Innovat Manage 32(5):666–684Google Scholar
  90. Kotlar J, De Massis A (2013) Goal setting in family firms: goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrep Theory Pract 37(6):1263–1288Google Scholar
  91. Kotlar J, Fang H, De Massis A, Frattini F (2014a) Profitability goals, control goals, and the R&D investment decisions of family and nonfamily firms. J Prod Innovat Manage 31(6):1128–1145Google Scholar
  92. Kotlar J, De Massis A, Fang H, Frattini F (2014b) Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Bus Econ 43(3):597–619Google Scholar
  93. Kraiczy ND, Hack A, Kellermanns FW (2014) New product portfolio performance in family firms. J Bus Res 67(6):1065–1073Google Scholar
  94. Kraus S, Pohjola M, Koponen A (2012) Innovation in family firms: an empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Rev Manag Sci 6(3):265–286Google Scholar
  95. Le Breton-Miller I, Miller D (2006) Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrep Theory Pract 30(6):731–746Google Scholar
  96. Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. Manag Informat Syst 31(1):59–87Google Scholar
  97. Ling Y, Kellermanns FW (2010) The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: the moderating role of information exchange frequency. J Manage Stud 47(2):322–344Google Scholar
  98. Litz RA, Kleysen RF (2001) Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Fam Bus Rev 14(4):335–352Google Scholar
  99. Liu J, Chen J, Tao Y (2015) Innovation performance in new product development teams in china’s technology ventures: the role of behavioral integration dimensions and collective efficacy. J Prod Innovat Manage 32(1):29–44Google Scholar
  100. Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF (2006) Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J Manage 32(5):646–672Google Scholar
  101. Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. J Bus Ventur 16(5):429–451Google Scholar
  102. Lumpkin GT, Steier L, Wright M (2011) Strategic entrepreneurship in family business. Strateg Entrep J 5(4):285–306Google Scholar
  103. Machold S, Huse M, Minichilli A, Nordqvist M (2011) Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: a team production approach. Corp Gov 19(4):368–383Google Scholar
  104. Mahto RV, Davis PS, Pearce II, John A, Robinson RB Jr (2010) Satisfaction with firm performance in family businesses. Entrep Theory Pract 34(5):985–1001Google Scholar
  105. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87Google Scholar
  106. Marchisio G, Mazzola P, Sciascia S, Miles M, Astrachan J (2010) Corporate venturing in family business: the effects on the family and its members. Entrep Reg Dev 22(3–4):349–377Google Scholar
  107. Martinez-Romero MJ, Rojo-Ramirez AA (2015) Socioemotional wealth’s implications in the calculus of the minimum rate of return required by family businesses’ owners. Rev Manag Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11846-015-0181-9 Google Scholar
  108. Matzler K, Veider V, Hautz J, Stadler C (2015) The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. J Prod Innovat Manage 32(3):319–333Google Scholar
  109. McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad Manage J 44(1):118–131Google Scholar
  110. Memili E, Eddleston KA, Kellermanns FW, Zellweger TM, Barnett T (2010) The critical path to family firm success through entrepreneurial risk taking and image. J Fam Bus Strategy 1(4):200–209Google Scholar
  111. Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2006) Family governance and firm performance: agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Fam Bus Rev 19(1):73–87Google Scholar
  112. Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Scholnick B (2008) Stewardship versus stagnation: an empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. J Manage Stud 45(1):51–78Google Scholar
  113. Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I, Lester RH (2013) Family firm governance, strategic conformity and performance: institutional versus strategic perspectives. Organ Sci 24:189–209Google Scholar
  114. Minichilli A, Corbetta G, MacMillan IC (2010) Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance. J Manage Stud 47(2):205–222Google Scholar
  115. Moss TW, Payne GT, Moore CB (2014) Strategic consistency of exploration and exploitation in family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 27(1):51–71Google Scholar
  116. Naldi L, Nordqvist M, Sjöberg K, Wiklund J (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 20(1):33–47Google Scholar
  117. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  118. Orth UR, Green MT (2009) Consumer loyalty to family versus non-family business: the roles of store image, trust and satisfaction. J Retail Consum Serv 16(4):248–259Google Scholar
  119. Patel PC, Chrisman JJ (2014) Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strateg Manage J 35(4):617–627Google Scholar
  120. Patel PC, Fiet JO (2011) Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Entrep Theory Pract 35(6):1179–1197Google Scholar
  121. Patel PC, Kohtamäki M, Parida V, Wincent J (2015) Entrepreneurial orientation-as-experimentation and firm performance: the enabling role of absorptive capacity. Strateg Manage J 36(11):1739–1749Google Scholar
  122. Peng DX, Lai F (2012) Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research. J Oper Manag 30(6):467–480Google Scholar
  123. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage 12(4):531–544Google Scholar
  124. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–891Google Scholar
  125. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manage 34(3):375–409Google Scholar
  126. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ Sci 20(4):685–695Google Scholar
  127. Rego A, Oliveira P, Rosado P, Habib N (2014) Product innovation in resource-poor environments: three research streams. J Prod Innovat Manage 31(2):202–210Google Scholar
  128. Reisinger S, Lehner JM (2015) Navigating a family business through a changing environment: findings from a longitudinal study. Rev Manag Sci 9(2):411–429Google Scholar
  129. Rindova VP, Williamson IO, Petkova AP, Sever JM (2005) Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad Manage J 48(6):1033–1049Google Scholar
  130. Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). University of Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  131. Robeson D, O’Connor GC (2013) Boards of directors, innovation, and performance: an exploration at multiple levels. J Prod Innovat Manag 30(4):608–625Google Scholar
  132. Sageder M, Mitter C, Feldbauer-Durstmüller B (2016) Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research. DOI, Rev Manag Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11846-016-0216-x Google Scholar
  133. Salvato C, Melin L (2008) Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: the role of family social capital. Fam Bus Rev 21(3):259–276Google Scholar
  134. Sanchez-Famoso V, Maseda A, Iturralde T (2014) The role of internal social capital in organisational innovation. An empirical study of family firms. Eur Manag J 32(6):950–962Google Scholar
  135. Schuster T, Holtbrügge D (2014) Resource dependency, innovative strategies, and firm performance in BOP markets. J Prod Innovat Manage 31(S1):43–59Google Scholar
  136. Sciascia S, Mazzola P, Chirico F (2013) Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrep Theory Pract 37(1):69–85Google Scholar
  137. Sciascia S, Mazzola P, Kellermanns FW (2014) Family management and profitability in private family-owned firms: introducing generational stage and the socioemotional wealth perspective. J Fam Bus Strategy 5(2):131–137Google Scholar
  138. Sciascia S, Nordqvist M, Mazzola P, De Massis A (2015) Family ownership and R&D intensity in small-and medium-sized firms. J Prod Innovat Manage 32(3):349–360Google Scholar
  139. Sharma P (2004) An overview of the field of family business studies: current status and directions for the future. Fam Bus Rev 17(1):1–36Google Scholar
  140. Sharma P, Irving PG (2005) Four bases of family business successor commitment: antecedents and consequences. Entrep Theory Prac 29(1):13–33Google Scholar
  141. Sharma P, Salvato C (2011) Commentary: exploiting and exploring new opportunities over life cycle stages of family firms. Entrep Theory Prac 35(6):1199–1205Google Scholar
  142. Shu C, Page AL, Gao S, Jiang X (2012) Managerial ties and firm innovation: is knowledge creation a missing link? J Prod Innovat Manage 29(1):125–143Google Scholar
  143. Sieger P, Bernhard F, Frey U (2011) Affective commitment and job satisfaction among non-family employees: investigating the roles of justice perceptions and psychological ownership. J Fam Bus Strategy 2(2):78–89Google Scholar
  144. Simon M, Shrader RC (2012) Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: the role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions. J Bus Ventur 27(3):291–309Google Scholar
  145. Sirmon DG, Hitt MA (2003) Managing resources: linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrep Theory Pract 27(4):339–358Google Scholar
  146. Sorenson RL, Goodpaster KE, Hedberg PR, Yu A (2009) The family point of view, family social capital, and firm performance an exploratory test. Fam Bus Rev 22(3):239–253Google Scholar
  147. Stadler C, Rajwani T, Karaba F (2014) Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma: networks as a new level of analysis. Int J Manag Rev 16(2):172–193Google Scholar
  148. Steiger T, Duller C, Hiebl MRW (2015) No consensus in sight: an analysis of ten years of family business definitions in empirical research studies. J Enterp Cult 23(01):25–62Google Scholar
  149. Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc 36(2):111–133Google Scholar
  150. Stubner S, Blarr WH, Brands C, Wulf T (2012) Organizational ambidexterity and family firm performance. J Small Bus Entrep 25(2):217–229Google Scholar
  151. Sundaramurthy C, Kreiner GE (2008) Governing by managing identity boundaries: the case of family businesses. Entrep Theory Pract 32(3):415–436Google Scholar
  152. Talke K, Salomo S, Rost K (2010) How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Res Policy 39(7):907–918Google Scholar
  153. Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin YM, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(1):159–205Google Scholar
  154. Vallejo-Martos MC (2011) The organizational culture of family firms as a key factor of competitiveness. J Bus Econ Manage 12(3):451–481Google Scholar
  155. Veider V, Matzler K (2015) The abiltiy and willingness of family-controlled firms to arrive at organizational ambidexterity. J Fam Bus Strategy 7(2):106–116Google Scholar
  156. Venkatraman NU, Ramanujam V (1987) Measurement of business economic performance: an examination of method convergence. J Manage 13(1):109–122Google Scholar
  157. Villalonga B, Amit R (2009) How are US family firms controlled? Rev Financ Stud 22(8):3047–3091Google Scholar
  158. Voordeckers W, Van Gils A, Van den Heuvel J (2007) Board composition in small and medium-sized family firms. J Small Bus Manage 45(1):137–156Google Scholar
  159. Yang H, Phelps C, Steensma HK (2010) Learning from what others have learned from you: the effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms. Acad Manage J 53(2):371–389Google Scholar
  160. Zahra SA, Filatotchev I (2004) Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: a knowledge-based perspective. J Manage Stud 41(5):885–897Google Scholar
  161. Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):185–203Google Scholar
  162. Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, Larrañeta B (2007) Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: the moderating role of family involvement. J Bus Res 60(10):1070–1079Google Scholar
  163. Zellweger TM, Astrachan JH (2008) On the emotional value of owning a firm. Fam Bus Rev 21(4):347–363Google Scholar
  164. Zellweger TM, Eddleston KA, Kellermanns FW (2010) Exploring the concept of familiness: introducing family firm identity. J Fam Bus Strategy 1(1):54–63Google Scholar
  165. Zellweger TM, Nason RS, Nordqvist M, Brush CG (2013) Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 37(2):229–248Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Unai Arzubiaga
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amaia Maseda
    • 2
  • Txomin Iturralde
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Financial Economic IUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)BilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Financial Economic IUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)BilbaoSpain
  3. 3.Department of Financial Economic IIUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)BilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations