Advertisement

Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 317–334 | Cite as

Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship

  • Ricarda B. BounckenEmail author
  • Andreas J. Reuschl
Review Paper

Abstract

The sharing economy brings a new phenomenon—coworking-spaces. One aspect of coworking-spaces is the sharing of office space; another is the sharing of social spaces beside the office. Both give rise to social interactions and thus knowledge and idea exchanges which might provide more than a mere sharing of working-spaces but of entrepreneurship or of incubation. Coworking-spaces stimulate the finding of mates for teams, projects, and entrepreneurship. This paper introduces coworking-spaces into management research. We deliver an understanding of coworking-spaces and then identify key factors which lead to our conceptual model. Our model assumes that performance, especially entrepreneurial performance improves by the learning processes among coworking-users that take upon the individual efficacy, trust and community among coworking-users. All the concepts have a positive relation. Yet, opportunism, often as knowledge leakage, will directly and indirectly spoil learning processes and entrepreneurial performance as it reduces their antecedents trust and community building.

Keywords

Coworking space Entrepreneurship Self-efficacy Open innovation Learning Literature review 

JEL Classification

M130 M190 O350 L260 

References

  1. Arora P, Haynie JM, Laurence GA (2013) Counterfactual thinking and entrepreneurial self-efficacy: the moderating role of self-esteem and dispositional affect. Entrep Theory Pract 37:359–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00472.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachmann R (2000) Trust-conceptual aspects of a complex phenomenon. In: Lane C, Bachmann R (eds) Trust within and between organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 298–322Google Scholar
  3. Baron RA, Mueller BA, Wolfe MT (2016) Self-efficacy and entrepreneurs’ adoption of unattainable goals: the restraining effects of self-control. J Bus Ventur 31:55–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becerra M, Lunnan R, Huemer L (2008) Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. J Manag Stud 45:691–713. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00766.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belk R (2014) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res 67:1595–1600. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berends H, Jelinek M, Reymen I, Stultiëns R (2014) Product innovation processes in small firms: combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. J Prod Innovat Manag 31:616–635. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilandzic M, Foth M (2013) Libraries as coworking spaces: understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Libr Hi Tech 31:254–273. doi: 10.1108/07378831311329040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouncken RB (2016) University coworking-spaces: criteria, dimensions, and potentials of a new venture hub. Int J Technol Manag (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  9. Bouncken RB, Fredrich V (2016) Good fences make good neighbors? Directions and safeguards in alliances on business model innovation. J Bus Res 69:5196–5202. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd NG, Vozikis GS (1994) The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrep Theory Pract 18:63–77. doi:10.1.1.477.4240Google Scholar
  11. Bullough A, Renko M, Myatt T (2014) Danger zone entrepreneurs: the importance of resilience and self-efficacy for entrepreneurial intentions. Entrep Theory Pract 38:473–499. doi: 10.1111/etap.12006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capdevila I (2013) Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: coworking spaces as microclusters. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2414121 Google Scholar
  13. Cardon MS, Kirk CP (2015) Entrepreneurial passion as mediator of the self-efficacy to persistence relationship. Entrep Theory Pract 39:1027–1050. doi: 10.1111/etap.12089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cesinger B, Hughes M, Mensching H, Bouncken R, Fredrich V, Kraus S (2016) A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity, trust, and international market knowledge affect family firms’ multinationality. J World Bus 51:586–599. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chesbrough HW, Teece DJ (1996) Organizing for innovation: when is virtual virtuous? Harvard Bus Rev 74:65–73Google Scholar
  16. Clark J (2007) Coworkers of the world, unite! http://prospect.org/article/coworkers-world-unite. Accessed 15 Mar 2016
  17. Cohen B, Kietzmann J (2014) Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organ Environ 27:279–296. doi: 10.1177/1086026614546199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dacin MT, Dacin PA, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organ Sci 22:1203–1213. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Das TK, Teng B-S (1998) Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad Manag Rev 23:491–512. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1998.926623 Google Scholar
  20. Das TK, Teng B-S (2001) Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: an integrated framework. Organ Stud 22:251–283. doi: 10.1177/0170840601222004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Estellés-Arolas E, González-Ladrón-de-Guevara F (2012) Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. J Inf Sci 38:189–200. doi: 10.1177/0165551512437638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Felin T, Hesterly WS (2007) The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Acad Manag Rev 32:195–218. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.23464020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foertsch C (2011) The coworker’s profile. http://www.deskmag.com/en/the-coworkers-global-coworking-survey-168. Accessed 09 Mar 2016
  24. Franke N, Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res Policy 32:157–178. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frankenberger K, Weiblen T, Gassmann O (2013) Network configuration, customer centricity, and performance of open business models: a solution provider perspective. Ind Mark Manag 42:671–682. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gandini A (2015) The rise of coworking spaces: a literature review. Ephemer Theory Polit Organ 15:193–205Google Scholar
  27. Garrett LE, Spreitzer GM, Bacevice P (2014) Co-constructing a sense of community at work: the emergence of community in coworking spaces. Acad Manag Proc. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2014.139 Google Scholar
  28. Gohmann SF (2012) Institutions, latent entrepreneurship, and self-employment: an international comparison. Entrep Theory Pract 36:295–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00406.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graebner ME (2004) Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strateg Manag J 25:751–777. doi: 10.1002/smj.419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guerra G, Patuelli R (2014) The role of job satisfaction in transitions into self-employment. Entrep Theory Pract 40:543–571. doi: 10.1111/etap.12133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A (2015) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. doi: 10.1002/asi.23552 Google Scholar
  32. Hartl B, Hofmann E, Kirchler E (2016) Do we need rules for “what’s mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities. J Bus Res 69:2756–2763. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hite JM, Hesterly WS (2001) The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strateg Manag J 22:275–286. doi: 10.1002/smj.156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hsu DK, Wiklund J, Cotton RD (2015) Success, failure, and entrepreneurial reentry: an experimental assessment of the veracity of self-efficacy and prospect theory. Entrep Theory Pract. doi: 10.1111/etap.12166 Google Scholar
  35. Hughes M, Ireland RD, Morgan RE (2007) Stimulating dynamic value: social capital and business incubation as a pathway to competitive success. Long Range Plann 40:154–177. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2007.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes M, Morgan RE, Ireland RD, Hughes P (2011) Network behaviours, social capital, and organisational learning in high-growth entrepreneurial firms. Int J Entrep Small Bus 12:257–272. doi: 10.1504/IJESB.2011.039006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes M, Morgan RE, Ireland RD, Hughes P (2014) Social capital and learning advantages: a problem of absorptive capacity. Strat Entrep J 8:214–233. doi: 10.1002/sej.1162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johns T, Gratton L (2013) The third wave of virtual work. Harvard Bus Rev 91:66–73Google Scholar
  39. Kambil A, Eselius ED, Monteiro KA (2000) Fast venturing: the quick way to start web businesses. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 41:55Google Scholar
  40. Kickul J, Gundry LK, Barbosa SD, Whitcanack L (2009) Intuition versus analysis? Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entrep Theory Pract 33:439–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00298.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kolvereid L, Isaksen E (2006) New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. J Bus Ventur 21:866–885. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lamberton CP, Rose RL (2012) When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. J Mark 76:109–125. doi: 10.1509/jm.10.0368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lange B (2011) Re-scaling governance in Berlin’s creative economy. Cult Unbound J Curr Cult Res 3:187–208. doi: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Langfield-Smith K (2008) The relations between transactional characteristics, trust and risk in the start-up phase of a collaborative alliance. Manag Acc Res 19:344–364. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lévesque M, Shepherd DA, Douglas EJ (2002) Employment or self-employment: a dynamic utility-maximizing model. J Bus Ventur 17:189–210. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00063-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strateg Manag J 22:545–564. doi: 10.1002/smj.188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McGee JE, Peterson M, Mueller SL, Sequeira JM (2009) Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: refining the measure. Entrep Theory Pract 33:965–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00304.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moehlmann M (2015) Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. J Consum Behav 14:193–207. doi: 10.1002/cb.1512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moriset B (2014) Building new places of the creative economy: the rise of coworking spaces. In: Paper presented at the 2nd Geography of Innovation Conference, Utrecht University, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  50. Noorderhaven N, Thurik R, Wennekers S, Av Stel (2004) The role of dissatisfaction and per capita income in explaining self-employment across 15 European countries. Entrep Theory Pract 28:447–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00057.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oldenburg R (1989) The great good place: Café, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Oldenburg R, Brissett D (1982) The third place. Qual Sociol 5:265–284. doi: 10.1007/BF00986754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oskam J, Boswijk A (2016) Airbnb: the future of networked hospitality businesses. J Tour Futur 2:22–42. doi: 10.1108/JTF-11-2015-0048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pawar KS, Sharifi S (1997) Physical or virtual team collocation: does it matter? Int J Prod Econ 52:283–290. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(97)89241-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phelps CC (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad Manag J 53:890–913. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pohler N (2012) Neue Arbeitsräume für neue Arbeitsformen: coworking Spaces. Osterr Z Soziol 37:65–78. doi: 10.1007/s11614-012-0021-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2004) Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J Interact Mark 18:5–14. doi: 10.1002/dir.20015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schopfel J, Roche J, Hubert G (2015) Co-working and innovation: new concepts for academic libraries and learning centres. New Libr World 116:67–78. doi: 10.1108/NLW-06-2014-0072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 25:217–226. doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 Google Scholar
  60. Spinuzzi C (2012) Working alone together: coworking as emergent collaborative activity. J Bus Tech Commun 26:399–441. doi: 10.1177/1050651912444070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thurik AR, Carree MA, van Stel A, Audretsch DB (2008) Does self-employment reduce unemployment? J Bus Ventur 23:673–686. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Utsch A, Rauch A (2000) Innovativeness and initiative as mediators between achievement orientation and venture performance. Eur J Work Organ Psy 9:45–62. doi: 10.1080/135943200398058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhao X, Mattila AS, Eva Tao L-S (2008) The role of post-training self-efficacy in customers’ use of self service technologies. Int J Serv Ind Manag 19:492–505. doi: 10.1108/09564230810891923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Strategic Management and OrganizationUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations