Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 385–409 | Cite as

The effect of return migration driven social capital on SME internationalisation: a comparative case study of IT sector entrepreneurs in Central and Eastern Europe

Original Paper

Abstract

Transition to a market-based economic structure in the post-communist countries of the Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) region since the early 1990s has been accompanied by intense IT-driven technological change. Internationalisation opportunities have emerged for IT sector small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) based on the region’s strong possession of technical skills. However, while enhanced SME internationalisation is desirable in policy terms, the current socio-economic transitional context of the region is not compatible with a highly competitive global business environment. While transition has facilitated outward migration, return migrants who acquire social capital abroad and establish businesses upon return home may positively influence entrepreneurship, organisational human capital and SME internationalisation in the CEE region. This chain of phenomena remains relatively unresearched in a CEE context, hence this article presents an initial attempt to address it. A process-oriented qualitative case study approach is used to compare the experience of three IT sector entrepreneurs in Hungary who previously worked and studied abroad. Primarily, the acquisition of social capital from abroad is crucial for re-configuration of organisational human capital at home in order to drive ‘born-global’ SME internationalisation. This study therefore provides a basis for further empirical investigation of the overall transformative effect of individual return migrant entrepreneurs upon organisational human capital re-configuration and ensuing SME internationalisation. Additionally, policy suggestions are derived for development of international entrepreneur exchange programmes to enhance social capital development and human capital re-configuration in local innovative SME sectors.

Keywords

Return migration Social capital SME internationalisation 

JEL Classification

A10 A23 F02 F66 J6 R23 P23 

References

  1. Aldrich H, Martinez M (2001) Many are called, but few are chosen: an evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 25(4):41–55Google Scholar
  2. Andrews R (2010) Organizational social capital, structure and performance. Hum Relat 63(5):583–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120Google Scholar
  4. Baum M, Schwens C, Kabst R (2011) A typology of international new ventures: empirical evidence from high-technology industries. J Small Bus Manag 49(3):305–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell J, Loane S (2010) New-wave’ global firms: Web 2.0 and SME internationalisation. J Mark Manag 26(3/4):213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camisón C, Villar-López A (2010) Effect of SMEs’ international experience on foreign intensity and economic performance: the mediating role of internationally exploitable assets and competitive strategy. J Small Bus Manag 48(2):116–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cesinger B, Fink M, Madsen T-K, Kraus S (2012) Rapidly internationalizing ventures: how definitions can bridge the gap across contexts. Manag Decis 50(10):1816–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandra Y, Styles C, Wilkinson I (2009) The recognition of first time international entrepreneurial opportunities: evidence from firms in knowledge-based industries. Int Mark Rev 26(1):30–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chetty S, Agndal H (2007) Social capital and its influence on changes in internationalization mode among small and medium-sized enterprises. J Int Mark 15(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ciszewska-Mlinarič M, Mlinarič F (2010) Small firms in a small country: managerial factors, internationalization and performance of Slovenian SMEs. Manag Glob Transit 8(3):239–259Google Scholar
  11. Csedő K (2008) Negotiating skills in the global city: Hungarian and Romanian professionals and graduates in London. J Ethn Migr Stud 34(5):803–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Carolis D, Saparito P (2006) Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: a theoretical framework. Entrep Theory Pract 30(1):41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dustmann C, Weiss Y (2007) Return migration: theory and empirical evidence from the UK. Br J Ind Relat 45(2):236–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dustmann C, Fadlon I, Weiss Y (2011) Return migration, human capital accumulation and the brain drain. J Dev Econ 95(1):58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duval-Couetil N (2013) Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programs: challenges and approaches. J Small Bus Manag 51(3):394–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550Google Scholar
  17. European Commission (2013) Annual report on European SMEs 2012/2013. European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/performance-review/files/supporting-documents/2013/annual-report-smes-2013_en.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2013
  18. European Commission (2014) Erasmus and programme guide. European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/documents/erasmus-plus-programme-guide_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2014
  19. Evers N (2011) Why do new ventures internationalise? A review of the literature of factors that influence new venture internationalisation. Ir J Manag 30(2):17–46Google Scholar
  20. Evers N, O’Gorman C (2011) Improvised internationalization in new ventures: the role of prior knowledge and networks. Entrep Reg Dev 23(7/8):549–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Felker JA (2011) Professional development through self-directed expatriation: intentions and outcomes for young, educated Eastern Europeans. Int J Train Dev 5(1):76–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Filippini R, Güttel WH, Nosella A (2012) Dynamic capabilities and the evolution of knowledge management projects in SMEs. Int J Technol Manag 60(3/4):202–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Földvári P, van Leeuwen B (2005) An estimation of the human capital stock in Eastern and Central Europe. East Eur Econ 43(6):53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gittins T, Fink M (2015) Return migration, informal learning, human capital development and SME internationalization in the CEE region: a systematic literature review. J East Eur Manag Stud (accepted)Google Scholar
  25. Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies of qualitative research. Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Harms R, Kraus S, Schwarz E (2009) The suitability of the configuration approach in entrepreneurship research. Entrep Reg Dev 21(1):25–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hárs Á (2013) Magyarok—külföldön. Gondolatok a magyarok külföldi munkavállalásról. (Hungarians—abroad. Notes on Workforce Emigration). Magyar Tudomány 174(3):286–291Google Scholar
  28. Jenssen J, Koenig H (2002) The effects of social networks on resource access and business start-ups. Eur Plan Stud 10(8):1039–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeong B, Kejak M, Vinogradov V (2008) Changing composition of human capital The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Econ Transit 16(2):247–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knight G, Cavusgil S (1996) The born global firm: a challenge to traditional internationalisation theory. Adv Int Mark 8:11–26Google Scholar
  32. Kreiser PM, Patel PC, Fiet JO (2013) The influence of changes in social capital on firm founding activities. Entrep Theory Pract 37(3):539–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laki M (2011) A termék-és szolgáltatáspiacok átalakulása 1989 után (The transformation of product and service markets after 1989). MTA Közgazdaságtudományi Intézet (Hungarian Academy of Science Institute of Economics) 15:38–114Google Scholar
  34. Lang R, Novy A (2014) Cooperative housing and social cohesion: the role of linking social capital. Eur Plan Stud 22(8):1744–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lasagni A (2012) How can external relationships enhance innovation in SMEs? New evidence for Europe. J Small Bus Manag 50(2):310–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lowik S, van Rossum D, Kraaijenbrink J, Groen A (2012) Strong ties as sources of new knowledge: how small firms innovate through bridging capabilities. J Small Bus Manag 50(2):239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Major I (2008) Technical efficiency, allocative efficiency and profitability in Hungarian small and medium-sized enterprises: a model with frontier functions. Eur Asia Stud 60(8):1371–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manolova TS, Eunni RV, Gyoshev BS (2008) Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrep Theory Pract 32(1):203–218Google Scholar
  39. Martinez M, Aldrich H (2011) Networking strategies for entrepreneurs: balancing cohesion and diversity. Int J Entrep Behav Res 17(1):7–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCormick C (2004) Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. Int J Soc Res Methodol 7(3):219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McMullen JS, Dimov D (2013) Time and the entrepreneurial journey: the problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. J Manag Stud 50(8):1481–1512Google Scholar
  42. McNulty NG, Katkov A (1992) Management education in Eastern Europe: ‘fore and after. Acad Manag Exec 6(4):78–87Google Scholar
  43. Ming-Jer C, Miller D (2010) West meets East: toward an ambicultural approach to management. Acad Manag Perspect 24(4):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(2):242–266Google Scholar
  45. Neck HM, Greene PG (2011) Entrepreneurship Education: known worlds and new frontiers. J Small Bus Manag 49(1):55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paldam M, Svendsen GT (2001) Missing social capital and the transition in Eastern Europe. J Inst Innov Dev Transit 5:21–34Google Scholar
  48. Paucar-Caceres A (2009) Pragmatism and rationalism in the development of management science methodologies in the UK and France. Syst Res Behav Sci 26(4):429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prashantham S, Dhanaraj C (2010) The dynamic influence of social capital on the international growth of new ventures. J Manag Stud 47(6):967–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reuber AR, Fischer E (2011) International entrepreneurship in internet-enabled markets. J Bus Ventur 26(6):660–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roberts K, Povall S, Tholen J (2005) Farewell to the intelligentsia: political transformation and changing forms of leisure consumption in the former communist countries of Eastern Europe. Leis Stud 24(2):115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruzzier M, Antoncic B, Hisrich R, Konecnik M (2007) Human capital and SME internationalization: a structural equation modeling study. Can J Adm Sci 24(1):15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sass M (2012) Internationalisation of innovative SMEs in the Hungarian medical precision instruments industry. Post-Communist Econ 24(3):365–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schulz A, Borghoff T, Kraus S (2009) International entrepreneurship: towards a theory of SME internationalization. J Int Bus Econ 9(1):1–12Google Scholar
  55. Sels L, De Winne S, Maes J, Delmotte J, Faems D, Forrier A (2006) Unravelling the HRM-performance link: value-creating and cost-increasing effects of small business HRM. J Manag Stud 43(2):319–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 26(1):13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Slotte-Kock S, Coviello NE (2009) Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways forward. Entrep Theory Pract 31(1):31–57Google Scholar
  58. Storey D, Saridakis G, Sen-Gupta S, Edwards P, Blackburn R (2010) Linking HR formality with employee job quality: the role of firm and workplace size. Hum Resour Manag 49(2):305–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Svetličič M, Jacklič A, Burger A (2007) Internationalization of small and medium-size enterprises from selected Central European economies. East Eur Econ 45(4):36–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Szerb L, Márkus G (2008) Nemzetköziesedési tendenciák a kis-és közepes méretű vállalatok körében Magyarországon a 2000-es évek közepén (Internationalisation tendencies of SMEs in Hungary from 2000–2010) Vállalkozás és Innovació (Entrep Innov) 2(2):36–58Google Scholar
  61. Ucbasaran D, Westhead P, Wright M (2008) Opportunity identification and pursuit: does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter? Small Bus Econ 30(2):153–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vasilchenko E, Morrish S (2011) The role of entrepreneurial networks in the exploration and exploitation of internationalization opportunities by information and communication technology firms. J Int Mark 19(4):88–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wahba J, Zenou Y (2012) Out of sight, out of mind: migration, entrepreneurship and social capital. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42(5):890–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Welter F, Smallbone D (2011) Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. J Small Bus Manag 49(1):107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. White A, Ryan L (2009) Polish ‘temporary’ migration: the formation and significance of social networks. Eur Asia Stud 60(9):1467–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wright M, Westhead P, Ucbasaran D (2007) Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and international entrepreneurship: a critique and policy implications. Reg Stud 41(7):1013–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of LiverpoolMerseysideUK
  3. 3.Institute for Innovation ManagementJohannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria
  4. 4.Centre for Economic and Regional StudiesHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations