Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 361–384 | Cite as

SME innovativeness in buyer–seller alliances: effects of entry timing strategies and inter-organizational learning

  • Ricarda B. BounckenEmail author
  • Robin Pesch
  • Sascha Kraus
Original Paper


Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have to carefully decide their innovation timing and the associated market entry strategy to initiate change. The question of taking either a pioneer or a follower strategy for the innovation’s market entry has so far delivered controversial empirical results in large enterprises, while the performance implications of SMEs have been widely ignored. This is where our research sets out, investigating 169 established SMEs in a longitudinal study, with our results showing that SMEs take advantage of a pioneer strategy. As researched by a moderator analysis, a follower strategy can even have a reductive effect on performance: SMEs are not able to combine knowledge with allies downstream in the supply chain. Overall, our study delivers new insights into qualitative and quantitative change of established SMEs by employing a research design looking at the performance effects of strategies and knowledge combination among firms.


SME Innovativeness Supply chain partnerships Innovation timing Market entry 

JEL Classification

L26 M10 O32 


  1. Abdul A (1994) Pioneering versus incremental innovation: review and research propositions. J Prod Innov Manag 11:46–61Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal R (1998) Small firm survival and technological activity. Small Bus Econ 11:215–224Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich HE (1999) Organizations evolving. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Alpkan L, Yilmaz C, Kaya N (2007) Market orientation and planning flexibility in SMEs: performance implications and an empirical investigation. Int Small Bus J 25:152–172Google Scholar
  5. Anderson V, Boocock G, Graham S (2001) An investigation into the learning needs of managers in internationalising small and medium-sized enterprises. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 8:215–232Google Scholar
  6. Andrews KR (1987) The concept of corporate strategy. Irwin, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  7. Arend RJ (2006) SME—supplier alliance activity in manufacturing: contingent benefits and perceptions. Strateg Manag J 27:741–763Google Scholar
  8. Armario JM, Ruiz DM, Armario EM (2008) Market orientation and internationalization in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Small Bus Manag 46:485–511Google Scholar
  9. Atherton A (2003) The uncertainty of knowing: an analysis of the nature of knowledge in a small business context. Hum Relat 56:1379–1398Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE, Plummer LA (2009) Agency and governance in strategic entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 33:149–166Google Scholar
  11. Baker SD (2007) Followership: the theoretical foundation of a contemporary construct. J Leadersh Organ Stud 14:50–60Google Scholar
  12. Beekman AV, Robinson RB (2004) Supplier partnerships and the small, high-growth firm: selecting for success. J Small Bus Manag 42:59–77Google Scholar
  13. Bennett RJ, Ramsden M (2007) The contribution of business associations to SMEs: strategy, bundling or reassurance? Int Small Bus J 25(1):49–76Google Scholar
  14. Bessant J, Tidd J (2011) Innovation and entrepreneurship, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  15. BMWi (2013) German Mittelstand: engine of the German economy—facts and figures about small and medium-sized german firms. Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Bouncken RB (2011) Innovation by operating practices in project alliances: when size matters. Br J Manag 22:586–608Google Scholar
  17. Bouncken RB, Kraus S (2013) Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: the double-edged sword of coopetition. J Bus Res 66:2060–2070Google Scholar
  18. Bouncken RB, Teichert T, Koch M (2007) Innovation strategy explored: Innovation orientation’s strategy preconditions and market performance outcomes. J Bus Econ 77(2):19–43Google Scholar
  19. Brambor T, Clark WR, Golder M (2005) Understanding interaction models: improving empricial analyses. Polit Anal 14:63–82Google Scholar
  20. Brown J, Hendry C, Harborne P (2007) Developing radical technology for sustainable energy markets: the role of new small firms. Int Small Bus J 25:603–629Google Scholar
  21. Brüderl J, Schüssler R (1990) Organizational mortality: the liabilities of newness and adolescence. Adm Sci Q 35:530–547Google Scholar
  22. Buckley PJ, Glaister KW, Klijn E, Tan H (2009) Knowledge accession and knowledge acquisition in strategic alliances: the impact of supplementary and complementary dimensions. Br J Manag 20:598–609Google Scholar
  23. Bünnagel D (2014) Wachsende Nische. Verpack Rundsch 65:132–135Google Scholar
  24. Campbell DT (1955) The informant in quantitative research. Am J Sociol 60:339–342Google Scholar
  25. Carow K, Heron R, Saxton T (2004) Do early birds get the returns? An empirical investigation of early-mover advantages in acquisitions. Strateg Manag J 25:563–585Google Scholar
  26. Christensen C (1997) The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Christopher M (1998) Logistics and supply chain management: strategies for reducing cost and improving service. Financial Times Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Clarkson M, Fink M, Kraus S (2007) Industrial clusters as a factor for innovative-drive in regions of transformation and structural change: a comparative analysis of East-Germany and Poland. J East Eur Manag Stud 14(4):340–364Google Scholar
  29. Covin JG, Slevin DP, Covin TJ (1990) Content and performance of growth-seeking strategies: a comparison of small firms in high- and low-technology industries. J Bus Ventur 5:391–412Google Scholar
  30. Damanpour F (1996) Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Manag Sci 42:693–716. doi: 10.2307/2634460 Google Scholar
  31. Day GS (1994) Continuous learning about markets. Calif Manag Rev 36:9–31Google Scholar
  32. de Faria P, Lima F, Santos R (2010) Cooperation in innovation activities: the importance of partners. Res Policy 39:1082–1092Google Scholar
  33. Deshpandé R, Farley JU, Webster FE Jr (1993) Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. J Mark 57:23–37Google Scholar
  34. Dhanaraj C, Lyles MA, Steensam HK, Tihanyi L (2004) Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. J Int Bus Stud 35:428–442Google Scholar
  35. Dollinger MJ, Golden PA (1992) Interorganizational and collective strategies in small firms: environmental effects and performance. J Manag 18:695–715Google Scholar
  36. Ebben JJ, Johnson AC (2005) Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strateg Manag J 26:1249–1259Google Scholar
  37. Eggers F, Kraus S (2011) Growing young SMEs in hard economic times—the impact of entrepreneurial and customer orientations: a qualitative study from silicon valley. J Small Bus Entrep 24:99–111Google Scholar
  38. Eggers F, O’Dwyer M, Kraus S, Vallaster C, Güldenberg S (2012) The impact of brand authenticity on brand trust and SME growth: a CEO perspective. J World Bus 48:340–348Google Scholar
  39. Ekanem I, Smallbone D (2007) Learning in small manufacturing firms: the case of investment decision-making behaviour. Int Small Bus J 25:107–129Google Scholar
  40. Feeser HR, Willard GE (1990) Founding strategy and performance: a comparison of high and low growth high tech firms. Strateg Manag J 11:87–98Google Scholar
  41. Fischer M, Himme A, Sönke A (2007) Pionier, früher Folger oder später Folger: welche Strategie verspricht den größten Erfolg? Z Betriebswirtschaft 77:539–573Google Scholar
  42. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluation structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50Google Scholar
  43. Freel MS (2000) Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. Int Small Bus J 18:60–80Google Scholar
  44. Freel MS (2005) Perceived environmental uncertainty and innovation in small firms. Small Bus Econ 25:49–64Google Scholar
  45. Fricke AK (2014) Darf es etwas weniger sein?. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Gibb AA (1997) Small firms’ training and competitiveness. Building upon the small business as a learning organisation. Int Small Bus J 15:13–29Google Scholar
  47. Gomes-Casseres B (1997) Alliance strategies of small firms. Small Bus Econ 9:33–44Google Scholar
  48. Granovetter M (1973) The strengths of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360–1380Google Scholar
  49. Grant RM, Baden-Fuller C (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J Manag Stud 41:61–84Google Scholar
  50. Gronum S, Verreynne M-L, Kastelle T (2012) The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. J Small Bus Manag 50:257–282Google Scholar
  51. Grundström C, Sjöström R, Uddenberg A, Rönnbäck AÖ (2012) Fast-growing SMEs and the role of innovation. Int J Innov Manag 16:1240003–1240022Google Scholar
  52. Grunwald R, Kieser A (2007) Learning to reduce interorganizational learning: an analysis of architectural product innovation in strategic alliances. J Prod Innov Manag 24:369–391Google Scholar
  53. Gulati R, Lavie D, Singh H (2009) The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strateg Manag J 30:1213–1233Google Scholar
  54. Gunasekaran A, Patel C, McGaughey RE (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int J Prod Econ 87:333–347Google Scholar
  55. Hadjimanolis A, Dickson K (2000) Innovation strategies of SME in Cyprus, a small developing country. Int Small Bus J 18:62–79Google Scholar
  56. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a Silver Bullet. J Mark Theor Pract 19(2):139–151Google Scholar
  57. Hamel G (1991) Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strateg Manag J 12:83–103Google Scholar
  58. Hanson MT (1999) The search transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Adm Sci Q 44:82–111Google Scholar
  59. Harryson SJ, Dudkowski R, Stern A (2008) Transformation networks in innovation alliances: the development of Volvo c70. J Manag Stud 45:745–773Google Scholar
  60. Henderson AD (1999) Firm strategy and age dependence: a contingent view of the liabilities of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence. Adm Sci Q 44:281–314Google Scholar
  61. Holmqvist M (1999) Learning in imaginary organizations: creating interorganizational knowledge. J Organ Change Manag 12:419–438Google Scholar
  62. Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ (2001) Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strateg Manag J 22:899–906Google Scholar
  63. Inkpen AC (2000) A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strateg Manag J 21:775–779Google Scholar
  64. Jüttner U, Christopher M, Baker S (2007) Demand chain management-integrating marketing and supply chain management. Ind Market Manag 36:377–392Google Scholar
  65. Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strateg Manag J 21:217–237Google Scholar
  66. Kandemir D, Yaprak A, Cavusgil ST (2006) Alliance orientation: conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. J Acad Market Sci 34:324–340Google Scholar
  67. Kraus S (2013) The role of entrepreneurial orientation in service firms: empirical evidence from Austria. Serv Ind J 33:427–444Google Scholar
  68. Kraus S, Kauranen I, Reschke CH (2011) Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach. Manag Res Rev 34:58–74Google Scholar
  69. Laforet S (2010) Managing brands: a contemporary perspective. McGraw-Hill, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  70. Lajara BM, Lillo FG (2004) SMEs and supplier alliances use: an empirical analysis. Supply Chain Manag Int J 9:71–85Google Scholar
  71. Lambkin M, Day GS (1989) Evolutionary processes in competitive markets: beyond the product life cycle. J Mark 53:4–20Google Scholar
  72. Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative capacity and interorganizational learning. Strateg Manag J 19:461–477Google Scholar
  73. Lechner C, Dowling M, Welpe I (2006) Firm networks and firm development: the role of the relational mix. J Bus Ventur 21:514–540Google Scholar
  74. Leonardbarton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manag J 13:111–125Google Scholar
  75. Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manag Sci 50:1477–1490Google Scholar
  76. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1988) First-mover advantages. Strateg Manag J 9:41–58Google Scholar
  77. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1998) First-mover (dis)advantages: retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 19:1111–1125Google Scholar
  78. Lui SS (2009) The roles of competence trust, formal contract, and time horizon in interorganizational learning. Organ Stud 30:333–353Google Scholar
  79. Madrid-Guijarro A, Garcia D, Van Auken H (2009) Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. J Small Bus Manag 47:465–488Google Scholar
  80. Matlay H (2000) Organisational learning in small learning organisations: an empirical overview. Educ + Train 42:202–211Google Scholar
  81. Mentzer JT (2001) Supply chain management. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  82. Min S, Kalwani MU, Robinson WT (2006) Market pioneer and early follower survival risks: a contingency analysis of really new versus incrementally new product-markets. J Mark 70:15–33Google Scholar
  83. Morrissey WJ, Pittaway L (2006) Buyer-supplier relationships in small firms the use of social factors to manage relationships. Int Small Bus J 24:272–298Google Scholar
  84. Murthi BPS, Srinivasan K, Kalyanaram G (1996) Controlling for observed and unobserved managerial skills in determining first-mover market share advantages. J Mark Res 33:329–336Google Scholar
  85. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2010) Mplus user’s guide. 6th edition. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  86. Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change, vol 4. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  87. Okhuysen GA, Eisenhardt KM (2002) Integrating knowledge in groups: how formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ Sci 13(4):370–386Google Scholar
  88. Paladino A (2008) Analyzing the effects of market and resource orientations on innovative outcomes in times of turbulence. J Prod Innov Manag 25:577–592Google Scholar
  89. Pelham AM (2000) Market orientation and other potential influences on performance in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms. J Small Bus Manag 38:48–67Google Scholar
  90. Pelham A, Wilson DT (1996) A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimension of small-firm performance. J Acad Mark Sci 24:27–43Google Scholar
  91. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  92. Phelps CC (2010) A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Acad Manag J 53:890–913Google Scholar
  93. Pittaway L, Rose M (2006) Learning and relationships in small firms introduction to the special issue. Int Small Bus J 24:227–231Google Scholar
  94. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Jeong-Yeon L, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literarture and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903Google Scholar
  95. Robinson WT, Min S (2002) Is the first to market the first to fail? Empirical evidence for industrial goods businesses. J Mark Res 39:120–128Google Scholar
  96. Röhring R, Mis K, Wieschebrock S (2010) Brachenreport verpackungsindustrie. IG Metall, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  97. Roper S (1997) Product innovation and small business growth: a comparison of the strategies of German, UK and Irish companies. Small Bus Econ 9:523–537Google Scholar
  98. Ruokonen M (2008) Market orientation and product strategies in small internationalising software companies. J High Technol Manag Res 18:143–156Google Scholar
  99. Schindehutte M, Morris MH, Kocak A (2008) Understanding market-driving behavior: the role of entrepreneurship. J Small Bus Manag 46:4–26Google Scholar
  100. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  101. Semrau T, Sigmund S (2012) Networking ability and the financial performance of new ventures: a mediation analysis among younger and more-mature firms. Strateg Entrep J 6:335–354Google Scholar
  102. Shamsie J, Phelps C, Kuperman J (2004) Better late than never: a study of late entrants in household electrical equipment. Strateg Manag J 25:69–84Google Scholar
  103. Shankar V, Carpenter GS, Krishnamurthi L (1998) Late mover advantange: how innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. J Mark Res 35:28–62Google Scholar
  104. Shepherd DA (1997) New venture entry strategy: to pioneer or not to pioneer. In: Academy of Management Proceedings, pp 108–112Google Scholar
  105. Slater SF, Narver JC (1994) Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? J Mark 58:46–55Google Scholar
  106. Slater SF, Narver JC (1998) Customer-led and market-oriented: let’s not confuse the two. Strateg Manag J 19:1001–1006Google Scholar
  107. Soroka W (2002) Fundamentals of packaging technology. Institute of Packaging Professionals, Naperville, ILGoogle Scholar
  108. Steffens P, Davidsson P, Fitzsimmons J (2009) Performance configurations over time: implications for growth- and profit-oriented strategies. Entrep Theory Pract 33:125–148Google Scholar
  109. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533Google Scholar
  110. Tourangeou R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K (2000) The psychology of survey responses. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  111. Tsang EWK (1999) A preliminary typology of learning in international strategic alliances. J World Bus 34:211–229Google Scholar
  112. VDMA (2014) Die spannende Welt der Verpackungstechnik. Verband Deutscher Maschinen- und Anlagenbau, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  113. Zhang M, Macpherson A, Jones O (2006) Conceptualizing the learning process in SMEs Improving innovation through external orientation. Int Small Bus J 24:299–323Google Scholar
  114. Zheng Zhou K (2006) Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: the case of China. Ind Mark Manag 35:394–402Google Scholar
  115. Zollo M, Singh H (2004) Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers. Strateg Manag J 25:1233–1256Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricarda B. Bouncken
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robin Pesch
    • 1
  • Sascha Kraus
    • 2
  1. 1.Strategic Management and OrganizationUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Institute for EntrepreneurshipUniversity of LiechtensteinVaduzLiechtenstein

Personalised recommendations