Review of Managerial Science

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 327–363 | Cite as

The resource-based view of diversification success: conceptual issues, methodological flaws, and future directions

Review Paper

Abstract

After more than 20 years of empirical research, the resource-based view of the multibusiness firm has emerged as a promising paradigm for explaining diversification success—one of the most investigated research questions within the field of strategic management. However, because various dimensions of resource-relatedness, synergistic effects, and moderating influences are investigated at diverse levels of analysis, the findings are very fragmented. Our review and critical assessment of the research reveals a number of conceptual issues and methodological flaws that had already constrained heavily traditional diversification research. Consequently, we suggest promising directions for future research efforts that can put this important empirical application of the resource-based view of the firm on safer ground.

Keywords

Resource-based view Diversification Multibusiness firm Relatedness 

JEL Classification

M19 G39 

References

  1. Aggarwal RK, Samwick AA (2003) Why do managers diversify their firms? Agency reconsidered. J Financ 58:71–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amit R, Livnat J (1988a) Diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Acad Manag J 31:154–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amit R, Livnat J (1988b) Diversification strategies, business cycles and economic performance. Strateg Manag J 9:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews KR (1951) Product diversification and the public interest. Harv Bus Rev 29(4):91–107Google Scholar
  5. Ansoff HI (1957) Strategies for diversification. Harv Bus Rev 35(5):113–124Google Scholar
  6. Ansoff HI (1958) A model for diversification. Manag Sci 4:392–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ansoff HI (1965) Corporate strategy: an analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Audia PG, Locke EA, Smith KG (2000) The paradox of success: an archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad Manag J 43:837–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barney JB (1997) Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Barney JB (2001) Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Acad Manag Rev 26:41–56Google Scholar
  12. Bergh DD, Lawless MW (1998) Portfolio restructuring and limits to hierarchical governance: the effects of environmental uncertainty and diversification strategy. Organ Sci 9:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berry CH (1971) Corporate growth and diversification. J Law Econ 14:371–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bettis RA (1981) Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strateg Manag J 2:379–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bettis RA, Hall WK (1982) Diversification strategy, accounting determined risk, and accounting determined return. Acad Manag J 25:254–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bettis RA, Mahajan V (1985) Risk/return performance of diversified firms. Manag Sci 31:785–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brumagim AL (1992) Occupational skills linkages: a resource-based investigation of conglomerates. Acad Manag Proc:7–11Google Scholar
  18. Brush TH (1996) Predicted change in operational synergy and post-acquisition performance of acquired businesses. Strateg Manag J 17:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bryce DJ, Winter SG (2009) A general interindustry relatedness index. Manag Sci 55:1570–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Camerer CF, Fahey L (1988) The regression paradigm: a critical appraisal and suggested directions. In: Grant JH (ed) Strategic management frontiers. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 443–459Google Scholar
  21. Chandler AD Jr (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang SJ (1996) An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring: entry, exit, and economic performance during 1981–89. Strateg Manag J 17:587–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chari MDR, Devaraj S, David P (2008) The impact of information technology investments and diversification strategies on firm performance. Manag Sci 54:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chatterjee S (1990) Excess resources, utilization costs, and mode of entry. Acad Manag J 33:780–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chatterjee S, Wernerfelt B (1991) The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence. Strateg Manag J 12:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Christensen HK, Montgomery CA (1981) Corporate economic performance: diversification strategy versus market structure. Strateg Manag J 2:327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Datta DK, Rajagopalan N, Rasheed AMA (1991) Diversification and performance: critical review and future directions. J Manag Stud 28:529–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. D’Aveni RA, Ravenscraft DJ, Anderson P (2004) From corporate strategy to business-level advantage: relatedness as resource congruence. Manag Decis Econ 25:365–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. David RJ, Han S-K (2004) A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strateg Manag J 25:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davis R, Duhaime IM (1992) Diversification, vertical integration, and industry analysis: new perspectives and measurement. Strateg Manag J 13:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Davis R, Thomas LG (1993) Direct estimation of synergy: a new approach to the diversity-performance debate. Manag Sci 39:1334–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis PS, Robinson RB Jr, Pearce JA II, Park SH (1992) Business unit relatedness and performance: a look at the pulp and paper industry. Strateg Manag J 13:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dess GG, Gupta A, Hennart J-F, Hill CWL (1995) Conducting and integrating strategy research at the international, corporate, and business levels: issues and directions. J Manag 21:357–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Farjoun M (1994) Beyond industry boundaries: human expertise, diversification and resource-related industry groups. Organ Sci 5:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Farjoun M (1998) The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification. Strateg Manag J 19:611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Farjoun M, Lai L (1997) Similarity judgments in strategy formulation: role, process and implications. Strateg Manag J 18:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gary MS (2005) Implementation strategy and performance outcomes in related diversification. Strateg Manag J 26:643–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goold M, Campbell A (1998) Desperately seeking synergy. Harv Bus Rev 76(5):130–143Google Scholar
  40. Gort M (1962) Diversification and integration in American industry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  41. Grant RM (1988) On ‘dominant logic’, relatedness and the link between diversity and performance. Strateg Manag J 9:639–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grant RM (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manag Rev 33(3):114–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, 7th edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  44. Harrison JS, Hall EH Jr, Nargundkar R (1993) Resource allocation as an outcropping of strategic consistency: performance implications. Acad Manag J 36:1026–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hill CWL, Hoskisson RE (1987) Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Acad Manag Rev 12:331–341Google Scholar
  46. Hill CWL, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE (1992) Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organ Sci 3:501–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hitt MA, Ireland RD (1986) Relationships among corporate level distinctive competencies, diversification strategy, corporate structure and performance. J Manag Stud 23:401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA (1990) Antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: a review and critique of theoretical perspectives. J Manag 16:461–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ilinitch AY, Zeithaml CP (1995) Operationalizing and testing Galbraith’s center of gravity theory. Strateg Manag J 16:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jacquemin AP, Berry CH (1979) Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. J Ind Econ 27:359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jones GR, Hill CWL (1988) Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strateg Manag J 9:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kor YY, Mahoney JT (2004) Edith Penrose’s (1959) contributions to the resource-based view of strategic management. J Manag Stud 41:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lant TK, Milliken FJ, Batra B (1992) The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: an empirical exploration. Strateg Manag J 13:585–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lemelin A (1982) Relatedness in the patterns of interindustry diversification. Rev Econ Stat 64:646–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leten B, Belderbos R, van Looy B (2007) Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. J Prod Innov Manag 24:567–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Li M, Wong Y-Y (2003) Diversification and economic performance: an empirical assessment of Chinese firms. Asia Pac J Manag 20:243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lissoni F, Breschi S, Malerba F (2003) Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Res Policy 32:69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mahoney JT, Pandian JR (1992) The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strateg Manag J 13:363–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. March JG, Sutton RI (1997) Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organ Sci 8:698–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Markides CC, Williamson PJ (1994) Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strateg Manag J 15:149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Markides CC, Williamson PJ (1996) Corporate diversification and organizational structure: a resource-based view. Acad Manag J 39:340–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7:77–91Google Scholar
  63. Martin JA (2011) Dynamic managerial capabilities and the multibusiness team: the role of episodic teams in executive leadership groups. Organ Sci 22:118–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Miller DJ (2004) Firms’ technological resources and the performance effects of diversification: a longitudinal study. Strateg Manag J 25:1097–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Miller DJ (2006) Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 27:601–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mishra A, Akbar M (2007) Empirical examination of diversification strategies in business groups: evidence from emerging markets. Int J Emerg Mark 2:22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mitchell W (1992) Are more good things better, or will technical and market capabilities conflict when a firm expands? Ind Corp Chang 1:327–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mitchell TR, James LR (2001) Building better theory: time and the specification of when things happen. Acad Manag Rev 26:530–547Google Scholar
  69. Montgomery CA (1982) The measurement of firm diversification: some new empirical evidence. Acad Manag J 25:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Montgomery CA (1985) Product-market diversification and market power. Acad Manag J 28:789–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Montgomery CA (1994) Corporate diversification. J Econ Perspect 8:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Montgomery CA, Hariharan S (1991) Diversified expansion by large established firms. J Econ Behav Organ 15:71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B (1988) Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q. RAND J Econ 19:623–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nathanson DA, Cassano JS (1982) Organization, diversity, and performance. Whart Mag 6:19–26Google Scholar
  75. Nayyar PR (1992) On the measurement of corporate diversification strategy: evidence from large U.S. service firms. Strateg Manag J 13:219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nayyar PR (1993) Performance effects of information asymmetry and economies of scope in diversified service firms. Acad Manag J 36:28–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Newbert SL (2007) Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strateg Manag J 28:121–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nicolai A, Kieser A (2002) Trotz eklatanter Erfolglosigkeit: Die Erfolgsfaktorenforschung weiter auf Erfolgskurs. DBW 62:579–596Google Scholar
  79. Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strateg Manag J 6:239–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Palich LE, Cardinal LB, Miller CC (2000) Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research. Strateg Manag J 21:155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Park C (2002) The effects of prior performance on the choice between related and unrelated acquisitions: implications for the performance consequences of diversification strategy. J Manag Stud 39:1003–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pehrsson A (2006) Business relatedness and performance: a study of managerial perceptions. Strateg Manag J 27:265–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  84. Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 14:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Piscitello L (2004) Corporate diversification, coherence and economic performance. Ind Corp Chang 13:757–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pitariu AH, Ployhart RE (2010) Explaining change: theorizing and testing dynamic mediated longitudinal relationships. J Manag 36:405–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ployhart RE, Vandenberg RJ (2010) Longitudinal research: the theory, design, and analysis of change. J Manag 36:94–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Porter ME (1987) From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harv Bus Rev 65(3):43–59Google Scholar
  89. Prahalad CK, Bettis RA (1986) The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strateg Manag J 7:485–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Priem RL, Butler JE (2001a) Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad Manag Rev 26:22–40Google Scholar
  91. Priem RL, Butler JE (2001b) Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: further comments. Acad Manag Rev 26:57–66Google Scholar
  92. Ramanujam V, Varadarajan P (1989) Research on corporate diversification: a synthesis. Strateg Manag J 10:523–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ravichandran T, Liu Y, Han S, Hasan I (2009) Diversification and firm performance: exploring the moderating effects of information technology spending. J Manag Inf Syst 25:205–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Reed R, Luffman GA (1986) Diversification: the growing confusion. Strateg Manag J 7:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Richard PJ, Devinney TM, Yip GS, Johnson G (2009) Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice. J Manag 35:718–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Robins JA, Wiersema MF (1995) A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strateg Manag J 16:277–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Robins JA, Wiersema MF (2003) The measurement of corporate portfolio strategy: analysis of the content validity of related diversification indexes. Strateg Manag J 24:39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rumelt RP (1974) Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Harvard University, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  99. Rumelt RP (1982) Diversification strategy and profitability. Strateg Manag J 3:359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sambharya RB (2000) Assessing the construct validity of strategic and SIC-based measures of corporate diversification. Br J Manag 11:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schwenk CR, Dalton DR (1991) The changing shape of strategic management research. Adv Strateg Manag 7:277–300Google Scholar
  102. Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19:425–442Google Scholar
  103. Shin N (2006) The impact of information technology on the financial performance of diversified firms. Decis Support Syst 41:698–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Shin N (2009) Information technology and diversification: how their relationship affects firm performance. Int J e-Collab 5:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Silverman BS (1999) Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Manag Sci 45:1109–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Singh H, Montgomery CA (1987) Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strateg Manag J 8:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sorrentino M, Williams ML (1995) Relatedness and corporate venturing: does it really matter? J Bus Ventur 10:59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. St. John CH, Harrison JS (1999) Manufacturing-based relatedness, synergy, and coordination. Strateg Manag J 20:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Stimpert JL, Duhaime IM (1997) In the eyes of the beholder: conceptualizations of relatedness held by the managers of large diversified firms. Strateg Manag J 18:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Stone-Romero EF (2009) Implications of research design options for the validity of inferences derived from organizational research. In: Buchanan DA, Bryman A (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods. SAGE, Los Angeles, pp 302–327Google Scholar
  111. Szeless G, Wiersema MF, Müller-Stewens G (2003) Portfolio interrelationships and financial performance in the context of European firms. Eur Manag J 21:146–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Tanriverdi H (2005) Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Q 29:311–334Google Scholar
  113. Tanriverdi H (2006) Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Q 30:57–77Google Scholar
  114. Tanriverdi H, Venkatraman N (2005) Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strateg Manag J 26:97–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Teece DJ (1982) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J Econ Behav Organ 3:39–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Teece DJ, Rumelt R, Dosi G, Winter SG (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. J Econ Behav Organ 23:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Vannoni D (2000) Diversification, the resource view and productivity: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Empirica 27:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wade MR, Gravill JI (2003) Diversification and performance of Japanese IT subsidiaries: a resource-based view. Inf Manag 40:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wan WP, Hoskisson RE, Short JC, Yiu DW (2011) Resource-based theory and corporate diversification: accomplishments and opportunities. J Manag 37:1335–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zhang MJ (2007) Assessing the performance impacts of information systems from the resource-based perspective: an empirical test of the indirect effect of IS. J Bus Strateg 24:141–164Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Technology and ManagementTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations