PERioperative Fluid Management in Elective ColecTomy (PERFECT)—a national prospective cohort study
- 21 Downloads
There is contradictory evidence regarding the merits of restricted versus liberal perioperative intravenous (IV) fluid administration in bowel surgery. This study sought to audit perioperative fluid management in elective colectomy in Ireland and to analyse the impact of such on operative outcomes.
A national surgical trainee collaborative audit of perioperative fluid management was performed. Data from each site was collected prospectively over a selected 3-week period within a pre-defined 2-month block. Collected variables included demographics, type of operation/anaesthethic, volume/type of fluid administration pre-, intra- and post-operatively, 30-day morbidity and mortality. Primary outcome was fluid balance 24-h post-operatively with further analysis to identify the impact of this on 30-day morbidity. ROC curves were generated to identify the critical volume at which fluid balance was associated with 30-day morbidity.
Ninety-four patients were enrolled from 17 hospitals. Mean age was 64 years. A total of 48.9% (N = 46) were managed by ERAS and 51.1% (N = 48) received bowel preparation. Almost 70% of cases (N = 63) were completed by minimally invasive techniques. Significant 30-day morbidity requiring hospital readmission was low [6.4% (n = 6)]. Median fluid balance at 24 h was + 715 ml (IQR 165–1486 ml). On multivariate analysis, high BMI (p = 0.02), indication for surgery (p = 0.02) and critical care admission (p = 0.008) were significantly predictive of 30-day morbidity. Twenty-four hour fluid balance >+ 665 ml was associated with increased risk of 30-day morbidity on univariate but not multivariate analysis, implying association but not causation.
Overall, perioperative fluid management was within an acceptable range with minimal impact on 30-day morbidity following elective colorectal surgery.
KeywordsColectomy Collaborative research Elective colectomy IV fluids Perioperative fluids Trainee collaborative
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical approval was sought prospectively from each regional clinical ethics committee prior to commencing data collection. Authorship was assigned in keeping with the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT)/National Research Collaborative (NRC) authorship model.
Conflict of interest
- 4.Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA, Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group, Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93(7):800–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.The Impact of Enhanced Recovery Protocol Compliance on Elective Colorectal Cancer Resection 2015 Results from an international registry. Ann Surg.Google Scholar
- 8.Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K et al (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238(5):641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bedi SS, Hetz R, Thomas C, Smith P, Olsen AB, Williams S, Xue H, Aroom K, Uray K, Hamilton J, Mays RW, Cox CS Jr (2013) Intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cell therapy attenuates activated microglial/macrophage response and improves spatial learning after traumatic brain injury. Stem Cells Transl Med 2:953–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Boesen AK, Maeda Y, Rorbaek Madsen M. Perioperative fluid infusion and its influence on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: implications for prevention strategiesGoogle Scholar
- 14.Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, Christophi C, Leslie K, McGuinness S, Parke R, Serpell J, Chan MTV, Painter T, McCluskey S, Minto G, Wallace S (2018) Restrictive versus Liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 378:2263–2274. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801601. [Epub ahead of print] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Chong PC, Greco EF, Stothart D, Maziak DE, Sundaresan S, Shamji FM et al (2009) Substantial variation of both opinions and practice regarding perioperative fluid resuscitation. Can J Surg 52:207–214Google Scholar
- 20.Boesen AK, Maeda Y, Rorbaek Madsen M (2013) Perioperative fluid infusion and its influence on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: implications for prevention strategies. Color Dis 15(9):e522–e527Google Scholar