Advertisement

High prevalence of risk factors for low bone mineral density and estimated fracture and fall risk among elderly medical inpatients: a missed opportunity

  • Muhammad Haroon
  • Kamil Khan
  • Lorraine Thong
  • Kabir Ali
  • Fayyaz Janjua
Original Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

(1) To calculate the absolute fracture risk by using the fracture risk assessment (FRAX) model among elderly medical inpatients; (2) to assess the risk of falls, especially among patients with increased risk of fractures; and (3) to design and implement a bone health protocol to improve the assessment of fracture risk.

Methods

The study participants were all inpatients admitted to the medical wards at University Hospital Kerry, Ireland. All consecutive eligible patients aged ≥ 65 years were prospectively evaluated to populate clinical risk factor variables used in the FRAX model and the fall assessment was made by using Fracture Risk Questionnaire.

Results

Consecutive 465 medical inpatients were screened, and 200 eligible medical inpatients were evaluated. The mean age of the cohort was 73.8 ± 9 years and 56% were male. The body mass index of the cohort was 27 ± 5, and only 21% (n = 42) of patients reported having ever had a DXA scan. Previous personal history of low fragility fracture was present in 20.5% (n = 41) of the patients. The absolute 10-year risk of major osteoporotic and hip fracture was 15 ± 12 and 7.6 ± 11, respectively, and 25.5% (n = 51) and 64.5% (n = 129) respectively of the cohort had fracture risks exceeding the National Osteoporosis Federation (NOF) thresholds for treatment. High fall risk was noted in 63% of the cohort.

Conclusions

A very high prevalence of fracture and fall risk was noted. A medical inpatient stay offers a window of opportunity for assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk. With these findings, a bone health protocol has been developed.

Keywords

Bone mineral density Fall Fracture Inpatients Prevalence 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was conducted in adherence with the Declaration of Helsinki and International Committee on Harmonization good clinical practices.

Conflict of interest

M Haroon received educational grants from AbbVie and Pfizer. None of the other named authors have any conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Office of the Surgeon General (US). Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville (MD): Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2004. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45513/. Accessed March 2014
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(4):385–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R, National Osteoporosis Foundation (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25(10):2359–2381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubenstein LZ, Vivrette R, Harker JO, Stevens JA, Kramer BJ (2011) Validating an evidence-based, self-rated fall risk questionnaire (FRQ) for older adults. J Saf Res 42(6):493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Laet C et al (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:1330–1338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Unni S, Yao Y, Milne N, Gunning K, Curtis JR, LaFleur J (2015) An evaluation of clinical risk factors for estimating fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis using an electronic medical record database. Osteoporos Int 26(2):581–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pluskiewicz W, Adamczyk P, Franek E, Leszczynski P, Sewerynek E, Wichrowska H, Napiorkowska L, Kostyk T, Stuss M, Stepien-Klos W, Golba KS, Drozdzowska B (2010) Ten-year probability of osteoporotic fracture in 2012 Polish women assessed by FRAX and nomogram by Nguyen et al.-conformity between methods and their clinical utility. Bone 46(6):1661–1667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott TA, Beveridge A, Ní CD (2016) Suboptimal bone protection in geriatric inpatients and effect of a simple educational and mnemonic strategy. Australas J Ageing 35(3):E36–E39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Fong-Soe-Khioe R, Fordham R, Gittoes N, Harvey I, Harvey N, Heawood A, Holland R, Howe A, Kanis J, Marshall T, O’Neill T, Peters T, Redmond N, Torgerson D, Turner D, Mc Closkey E; SCOOP Study Team. Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Dec 15. pii: S0140–6736(17)32640–5. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32640-5. [Epub ahead of print]

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineUniversity Hospital KerryTraleeIreland
  2. 2.Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicinePakistan Kidney and Liver InstituteLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations