Advertisement

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

, Volume 188, Issue 1, pp 89–99 | Cite as

A systematic review of Appropriate Use Criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the United States?

  • Robert N. KerleyEmail author
  • Siun O’Flynn
Review Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

The 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) were developed by the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) to provide guidance for referring physicians in response to growing concerns about unnecessary transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) requests. Very few studies have assessed how medical centers overseas perform against AUC. Evidence is now emerging that inappropriate referral rates in Europe are similar to those reported in the US.

Objective

This study systematically reviewed published evidence to identify (1) whether the 2011 AUC are applicable to medical centers outside the US (2) the level of adherence to the AUC across multiple centers, (3) the main factors which cause deviation from AUC, (4) any changes in referral rates since the publication of AUC, and (5) any factors and/or intervention strategies which promote adherence to AUC.

Methods and results

Electronic databases were systematically searched for papers related to AUC and cardiac imaging. Following screening and application of eligibility criteria, data was extracted from ten reports involving 8561 TTE studies. Classification rates were 99.5 and 98% for US studies and studies outside the US respectively. Overall, 7119 TTE studies were classified as appropriate (83.1%) of which 3724 were US referrals (84.7%) and 3395 originated outside the US (81.5%). Six of the included studies independently observed significantly more appropriate referrals among inpatients compared to outpatients (p < 0.001). US centers observed no significant difference in appropriate referral rates between physician specialties while one UK study showed cardiac surgeons ordered inappropriate TTEs more frequently than other specialties (p < 0.05). This review found no obvious trend in appropriate referral rates between 2012 and 2015 indicating no temporal change in physician ordering patterns. Only one educational interventional study met the author’s criteria which showed that while intervention was effective during its implantation (26% reduction in TTEs ordered per day), TTE referral rates regressed to pre-intervention levels overtime.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the American guideline AUC are applicable to centers outside the US and their implementation across five international centers suggest almost 1 in 5 scans could be avoided.

Keywords

Appropriate Use Criteria Transthoracic echocardiography 

Supplementary material

11845_2018_1843_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 34 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Andrus BW, Welch HG (2012) Medicare services provided by cardiologists in the United States: 1999–2008. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5(1):31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    (2012) A data book: health care spending and the Medicare programGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, Lai WW, Manning WJ, Patel AR et al (2011) ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24(3):229–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Douglas PS, Khandheria B, Stainback RF, Weissman NJ, Brindis RG, Patel MR, Khandheria B, Alpert JS, Fitzgerald D, Heidenreich P, Martin ET, Messer JV, Miller AB, Picard MH, Raggi P, Reed KD, Rumsfeld JS, Steimle AE, Tonkovic R, Vijayaraghavan K, Weissman NJ, Yeon SB, Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Patel MR, Peterson E, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American College of Chest Physicians, Society of Critical Care Medicine (2007) ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(2):187–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhatia RS, Carne DM, Picard MH, Weiner RB (2012) Comparison of the 2007 and 2011 appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography in various clinical settings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(11):1162–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mansour IN, Razi RR, Bhave NM, Ward RP (2012) Comparison of the updated 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography to the original criteria for transthoracic, transesophageal, and stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(11):1153–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parikh PB, Asheld J, Kort S (2012) Does the revised appropriate use criteria for echocardiography represent an improvement over the initial criteria? A comparison between the 2011 and the 2007 appropriateness use criteria for echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(2):228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bailey SA, Mosteanu I, Tietjen PA, Petrini JR, Alexander J, Keller AM (2012) The use of transthoracic echocardiography and adherence to appropriate use criteria at a regional hospital. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(9):1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ballo P, Bandini F, Capecchi I, Chiodi L, Ferro G, Fortini A, Giuliani G, Landini G, Laureano R, Milli M, Nenci G, Pizzarelli F, Santoro GM, Vannelli P, Cappelletti C, Zuppiroli A, American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Society of Echocardiography (2012) Application of 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography appropriateness use criteria in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography in a community setting. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(6):589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gurzun MM, Ionescu A (2014) Appropriateness of use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the USA? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15(4):450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patil HR, Coggins TR, Kusnetzky LL, Main ML (2012) Evaluation of appropriate use of transthoracic echocardiography in 1,820 consecutive patients using the 2011 revised appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 109(12):1814–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matulevicius SA, Rohatgi A, Das SR, Price AL, DeLuna A, Reimold SC (2013) Appropriate use and clinical impact of transthoracic echocardiography. JAMA Intern Med 173(17):1600–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koshy TP, Rohatgi A, Das SR, Price AL, deLuna A, Reimold N, Willett K, Reimold SC, Matulevicius SA (2015) The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31(3):521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alqarqaz M, Koneru J, Mahan M, Ananthasubramaniam K (2012) Applicability, limitations and downstream impact of echocardiography utilization based on the Appropriateness Use Criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(8):1951–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhatia RS, Dudzinski DM, Milford CE, Picard MH, Weiner RB (2014) Educational intervention to reduce inappropriate transthoracic echocardiograms: the need for sustained intervention. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, NY) 31(8):916–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vijayan S, Khanji M, Ionescu A (2011) Can application of appropriateness of use criteria reduce the workload in a tertiary echocardiographic laboratory? A single centre experience. Eur J Echocardiogr 12Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Kaisey A, Jones E, Nadurata V, Farouque O, De Silva D, Ramchand J (2015) Appropriate use of echocardiography in an Australian regional centre. Intern Med J 45(11):1128–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fonseca R, Negishi K, Otahal P, Marwick TH (2015) Temporal changes in appropriateness of cardiac imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 65(8):763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fonseca P, Sampaio F, Ribeiro J, Goncalves H, Gama V (2015) Appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography at a tertiary care center. Rev Port Cardiol 34(12):713–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Remfry A, Abrams H, Dudzinski DM, Weiner RB, Bhatia RS (2015) Assessment of inpatient multimodal cardiac imaging appropriateness at large academic medical centers. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 13(1):44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khezri BS, Helmersson-Karlqvist J, Larsson A (2014) Estimation of the possible economic effects of a sequential testing strategy with NT-proBNP before echocardiography in primary care. Clin Lab 60(6):881–886Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Medicine, Brookfield Health Sciences ComplexUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations