To tube or not to tube? Utilising a tubeless antegrade ureteric stenting system in a tertiary referral hospital
- 14 Downloads
To assess the benefits and complications of developing a practice of single-stage primary ureteral stenting in a university hospital.
A practice change developed from the traditional practice of multi-stage stenting to single-episode stent placement. To evaluate this change of practice, we retrospectively analysed data of 70 patients who underwent primary tubeless antegrade ureteric stenting and compared this group to the previous 54 patients who had a covering nephrostomy.
There was an overall success rate of 91.3% (85/93 stents having had tubeless antegrade stenting). There were no major and 33 minor complications. The comparative group of 54 patients whose stents had a covering nephrostomy had a median length of stay of 13.2 days compared to 7.4 days for the tubeless group.
Single-stage primary ureteric stenting is a safe practice to employ and has universal benefits for both the patient and the health service.
KeywordsHydronephrosis Interventional radiology Pyonephrosis Ureteric obstruction Ureteric stenting
Grams per decilitre
Grams per litre
Compliance with ethical standards
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Rajan DK, Patel NH, Valji K, Cardella JF, Bakal C, Brown D, Brountzos E, Clark TW, Grassi C, Meranze S, Miller D, Neithamer C, Rholl K, Roberts A, Schwartzberg M, Swan T, Thorpe P, Towbin R, Sacks D, CIRSE and SIR Standards of Practice Committees (2005) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous management of acute limb ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(5):585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar