Variations in biochemical values for common laboratory tests: a comparison among multi-ethnic Israeli women cohort
- 42 Downloads
Biochemical laboratory values are an essential tool in medical diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up; however, they are known to vary between populations. Establishment of ethnicity-adjusted reference values is recommended by health organizations.
To investigate the ethnicity element in biochemical lab values studying women of different ethnic groups.
Biochemical lab values (n = 27) of 503 adult Israeli women of three ethnicities (Jewish Ashkenazi, Jewish Sephardic, and Bedouin Arab) attending a single medical center were analyzed. Biochemical data were extracted from medical center records. Ethnic differences of laboratory biochemicals were studied using ANCOVA to analyze the center of the distribution as well as quartile regression analysis to analyze the upper and lower limits, both done with an adjustment for age.
Significant ethnic differences were found in almost half (n = 12) of the biochemical laboratory tests. Ashkenazi Jews exhibited significantly higher mean values compared to Bedouins in most of the biochemical tests, including albumin, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, cholesterol, cholesterol LDL and HDL, cholesterol LDL calc., folic acid, globulin, and iron saturation, while the Bedouins exhibited the highest mean values in the creatinine and triglycerides. For most of these tests, Sephardic Jews exhibited biochemical mean levels in between the two other groups. Compared to Ashkenazi Jews, Sephardic Jews had a significant shift to lower values in cholesterol LDL.
Ethnic subpopulations have distinct distributions in biochemical laboratory test values, which should be taken into consideration in medical practice enabling precision medicine.
KeywordsBiochemical tests Ethnicity HER - electronic health records RI - reference intervals
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Solberg HE (1987) International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, expert panel on theory of reference values: approved recommendation: on the theory of reference values. Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values: determination of reference limits. Clin Chimica Acta 170:S13–S32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline, 2nd ed, NCCLS document C28-A2. Wayne, PA: NCCLAGoogle Scholar
- 8.Koram K, Addae M, Ocran J, Adu-Amankwah S, Rogers W, Nkrumah F (2007) Population based reference intervals for common blood haematological and biochemical parameters in the akuapem north district. Ghana Med J 41:160–166Google Scholar
- 9.Karita E, Ketter N, Price MA, Kayitenkore K, Kaleebu P, Nanvubya A, Anzala O, Jaoko W, Mutua G, Ruzagira E, Mulenga J, Sanders EJ, Mwangome M, Allen S, Bwanika A, Bahemuka U, Awuondo K, Omosa G, Farah B, Amornkul P, Birungi J, Yates S, Stoll-Johnson L, Gilmour J, Stevens G, Shutes E, Manigart O, Hughes P, Dally L, Scott J, Stevens W, Fast P, Kamali A (2009) CLSI-derived hematology and biochemistry reference intervals for healthy adults in eastern and southern Africa. PLoS One 4:e4401. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kaya H, Kiki I, Akarsu E et al (2000) Hematological values of healthy adult population living at moderate altitude (1869 m, Erzurum, Turkey). Turkish J Haematol 17:123–128Google Scholar
- 13.Usman K, Syed ZA, Rao AA (2007) Reference range values of haematological parameters in healthy Pakistani adults. Pakistan J Physiol 3:19–22Google Scholar
- 15.Menard D, Mandeng MJ, Tothy MB et al (2003) Immunohematological reference ranges for adults from the Central African Republic. ClinVaccine Immuno 10:443–445Google Scholar
- 17.Lim E, Miyamura J, Chen JJ (2015) Racial/ethnic-specific reference intervals for common laboratory tests: a comparison among Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and White. Hawai‘I J Med Public Health 74(9):302–310Google Scholar
- 19.Roque FS, Jensen PB, Schmock H, Dalgaard M, Andreatta M, Hansen T, Søeby K, Bredkjær S, Juul A, Werge T, Jensen LJ, Brunak S (2011) Using electronic patient records to discover disease correlations and stratify patient cohorts. PLoS Comput Biol 7(8):e1002141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Central Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Abstract of Israel 2006 and 2016. Jerusalem CBSGoogle Scholar
- 22.Tse J, You W (2011) How accurate is the electronic health record?—a pilot study evaluating information accuracy in a primary care setting. Stud Health Technol Info 168:158–164Google Scholar
- 27.Millán J, Pintó X, Muñoz A, Zúñiga M, Rubiés-Prat J, Pallardo LF, Masana L, Mangas A, Hernández-Mijares A, González-Santos P, Ascaso JF, Pedro-Botet J (2009) Lipoprotein ratios: physiological significance and clinical usefulness in cardiovascular prevention. Vascular Health Risk Management 5:757–765Google Scholar
- 28.Pintó X, Ros E (2000) Lípidos séricos y predicción del riesgo cardiovascular: importancia de los cocientes colesterol total/colesterol HDL y colesterol LDL/colesterol HDL. Clinical Investion in Arteriosclerosis 12:267–284Google Scholar
- 34.Deshmukh-Taskar PR, O’Neil CE, Nicklas TA, Yang SJ, Liu Y, Gustat J, Berenson GS (2009) Dietary patterns associated with metabolic syndrome, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors in young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Public Health Nutr 12:2493–2503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009991261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar