Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

, Volume 188, Issue 1, pp 259–263 | Cite as

‘All by myself’: interns’ reports of their experiences taking consent in Irish hospitals

  • Roisin M. HeaneyEmail author
  • Michael Murray
  • Aine M. Heaney
  • Eva M. Doherty
Original Article



Obtaining patient consent is a fundamental process in surgical practice and is integral in respecting and safeguarding patient autonomy. It has been reported that the task of consenting patients frequently lies with junior doctors, who have the least experience of the procedure.


To examine the role of interns in the consent process in the Irish context as well as to identify their concerns.


A 12-point questionnaire, assessing interns’ experience with surgical consent, was circulated to interns in three Irish university teaching hospitals based in different geographical locations. Interns who had never worked in a surgical team were excluded from the analysis.


Out of 104 interns, 60 interns returned questionnaires. Of these, 58 (96.7%) had consented a patient for a surgical procedure. Forty-four interns (73.3%) had never been supervised by a senior doctor. Of the 58 interns who had obtained surgical consent, six interns (10.3%) reported knowledge of ‘all’ the steps of the procedure. Only five interns (8.6%) reported that they were aware of all the risks of the procedures and 34 interns (58.6%) reported they knew ‘most’ of the risks. Twenty-five interns (43%) reported that they had, at some point, been explained the risks of the procedures by a senior colleague.


The majority of interns reported that they had taken consent for a procedure without full knowledge of the procedure and its complications. Supervision or instruction from a senior colleague was reported by a minority.


Informed consent Interns Risk disclosure Surgical consent 


  1. 1.
    Health Service Executive. National consent policy. 2014. Available at Consent PolicyMay14.pdf.[ Accessed on 17/3/17]
  2. 2.
    Irish Medical Council. Guide to profession conduct and behaviour to for registered medical practitioners. 2009. Available at https://[Accessed on 02/01/17]
  3. 3.
    Houghton DJ, Williams S, Bennett JD et al (1997) Informed consent: patients’ and junior doctors’ perceptions of the consent procedure. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 22(6):515–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McDonald SE, Chadha NK, Mills RS (2008) Changing practices in the consent process for nose and throat procedures: a three-year study. J Laryngol Otol 122(10):1105–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schildmann J, Cushing A, Doyal L, Vollmann J (2005) Informed consent in clinical practice: pre-registration house officers’ knowledge, difficulties and the need for postgraduate training. Med Teach 27(7):649–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soin B, Smellie W, Thomson H (1993) Informed consent: a case for more education of the surgical team. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75(1):62–65Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Angelos P, DaRosa D, Bentram D (2002) Residents seeking informed consent: are they adequately knowledgeable? Curr Surg 59(1):115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chadha NK, Pratap R, Narula AA (2003) Consent processes in common nose and throat procedures. J Laryngol Otol 117(7):536–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cawich SO, Barnett AT, Crandon IW, Drew SD, Gordon-Strachan G (2013) From the patient’s perspective: is there a need to improve the quality of informed consent for surgery in training hospitals? Perm J 17(4):22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahmad R, Shobaki S, Etezadi V, Raju S, Case R (2009) Adequacy of consent in patients with distal radius fractures. Int Orthop 33(5):1311–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahman L, Clamp J, Hutchinson J (2011) Is consent for hip fracture surgery for older people adequate? The case for pre-printed consent forms. J Med Ethics 37(3):187–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Probert N, Malik A, Lovell M (2007) Surgery for fractured neck of femur—are patients adequately consented? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(1):66–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huntley JS, Anakwe R, Findlay I (2004) Informed consent and the JHO in Scotland. Int J Clin Pract 58(6):550–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wood F, Martin SM, Carson-Stevens A, Elwyn G, Precious E, Kinnersley P (2016) Doctors’ perspectives of informed consent for non-emergency surgical procedures: a qualitative interview study. Health Expect 19(3):751–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson OA, Wearne IM (2007) Informed consent for elective surgery—what is best practice? J R Soc Med 100(2):97–100Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edwards TJ, Finlay I, Wilkins DC, Lambert AW (2004) Improving risk disclosure during the consent process. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86(6):458–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McGaughey I (2004) Informed consent and knee arthroscopies: an evaluation of patient understanding and satisfaction. Knee 11(3):237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cowan J (2000) Consent and clinical governance: improving standards and skills. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 8(2):124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chadha NK, Repanos C (2004) How much do healthcare professionals know about informed consent? A Bristol experience. Surgeon 2(6):328–333 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kheiran A, Banerjee P, Stott P (2014) Consenting operative orthopaedic trauma patients: challenges and solutions. ISRN Surg 2014:354239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roisin M. Heaney
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Murray
    • 2
  • Aine M. Heaney
    • 3
  • Eva M. Doherty
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal College of Surgeons in IrelandDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.Depatment of SurgeryMayo University HospitalCastlebarIreland
  3. 3.School of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations