Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

, Volume 186, Issue 2, pp 471–476 | Cite as

Empirically derived weights for GMS capitation payments to General Practitioners

Original Article

Abstract

Aim

Unlike other weighted capitation schemes used in Irish health service financing and in health systems internationally, the GMS capitation payments scheme for General Practitioners lacks transparency in both the data used and the model employed. In this study, evidence-based weights were generated and compared to current payment weights.

Methods

Four datasets on GP utilisation were interrogated.

Results

Evidence-based weights indicated that over 70s had higher payments per consultation than other groups. Considerable intra-age band differences in capitation payment were detected.

Discussion and conclusion

The results suggest that there is a need for a comprehensive review of the current payments system. Current age bands should be narrowed. The implications for the efficiency and equity of general practice in Ireland are discussed.

Keywords

Weighted capitation General Medical Services Scheme General practice Health care financing 

References

  1. 1.
    Department of Health (2012) Future health a strategic framework for reform of the health service 2012–2015. Department of Health, DublinGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kroneman M. Paying General Practitioners in Europe. NIVEL, 2011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duran A, Lara JL, van Waveren M (2006) Health Systems in Transition, Spain: Health System Review: European Observatory on Health Care SystemsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schäfer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, Berg M, Westert G, Devillé W et al (2010) The Netherlands: health system review. Health Syst Trans 12(1):xxvii, 1–228Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rhys G, Beerstecher HJ, Morgan CL (2010) Primary care capitation payments in the UK. An observational study. BMC Health Services Res 10(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sibley LM, Glazier RH (2012) Evaluation of the equity of age–sex adjusted primary care capitation payments in Ontario, Canada. Health Policy 104(2):186–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van de ven WPMM, Ellis RP (2000) Risk adjustment in competitive health plan markets. In: Culyer AJNJP (ed) Handbook of health economics. 1: Elsevier, pp 755–845Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lamers LM, Vliet R (2003) Health-based risk adjustment Improving the pharmacy-based cost group. Eur J Health Econ 4(2):107–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McElroy B (2006) Risk-adjustment of prescription drug expenditure in Ireland. Department of Economics, University College Cork, CorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glynn LG, Valderas JM, Healy P, Burke E, Newell J, Gillespie P et al (2011) The prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care and its effect on health care utilization and cost. Fam Pract 28(5):516–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Molony D, Beame C, Behan W, Crowley J, Dennehy T, Quinlan M et al (2016) 70,489 primary care encounters: retrospective analysis of morbidity at a primary care centre in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 185(4):805–811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salisbury C, Procter S, Stewart K, Bowen L, Purdy S, Ridd M et al (2013) The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings. Br J Gen Pract 63(616):e751–e759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Behan B, Molony DD, Beame C, Cullen W (2013) Are Irish adult general practice consultation rates as low as official records suggest? A cross sectional study at six general practices. Ir Med J 106:297–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quarterly National Household Survey: Health Status and Health Service Utilisation. Central Statistics Office. 2011. http://www.cso.ie/en/qnhs/releasesandpublications/qnhs-specialmodules/. Accessed from 11/11/15
  15. 15.
    MRBI/Department of Health (2015) Healthy Ireland survey 2015: summary of findings. Department of Health, DublinGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barrett A BH, Cronin H, Hickey A, Kamiya Y, Kenny RA, Layte R, Maty S, McGee H, Morgan K, Mosca I, Normand C, O’Regan C, O’ Sullivan V, Savva G, Sofroniou N, Timonen V, Whelan B (2011) Fifty plus in Ireland 2011: First results from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Trinity College Dublin, DublinGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kenny RA, Whelan BJ, Cronin H, Kamiya Y, Kearney P, O’Regan C et al (2010) The design of the Irish longitudinal study on ageing. Trinity College Dublin, DublinGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Irish Social Science Data Archive. Available from: https://www.ucd.ie/issda/ Accessed from 30/11/2016
  19. 19.
    Harcourt S, Edwards D, Fleming D, Smith R, Smith G (2004) How representative is the population covered by the RCGP spotter practice scheme? Using Geographical Information Systems to assess. J Publ Health 26(1):88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Quail A, Williams J, McCrory C, Murray A, Thornton M (2011) A Summary Guide to Wave 1 of the Infant Cohort (at 9 months) of Growing up in Ireland. Economic and Social Research Institute, DublinGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    CSO (2012) Household Budget Survey. Cork: Central Statistics OfficeGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gorecki P (2016) The impact of free GP care on the utilisation of GP Services in Ireland: An evaluation of different approaches. ESRI, WP534Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Petrou S, Murray L, Cooper P, Davidson LL (2002) The accuracy of self-reported healthcare resource utilisation in health economic studiess. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 18(03):705–710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Evans C, Crawford B (1999) Patient self-reports in pharmacoeconomic studies. Pharmacoeconomics. 15(3):241–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kjellsson G, Clarke P, Gerdtham U-G (2014) Forgetting to remember or remembering to forget: a study of the recall period length in health care survey questions. J Health Econ 35:34–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eurostat. Eurostat Statistics Explained. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/European_health_interview_survey_-_methodology Accessed from 11/11/2015
  28. 28.
    CSO (2002) Quarterly National Household Survey: Health Third Quarter 2001. Cork: Central Statistics OfficeGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    O’Shea E (1997) Male mortality differentials by socio-economic group in Ireland. Soc Sci Med 45(6):803–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Layte R, Nolan A (2013) Socioeconomic differentials in male mortality in Ireland: 1984-2008. Working Paper, The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), DublinGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Department of Health (2013) Healthy Ireland: a framework for improved health and wellbeing 2013-2025. Department of Health, DublinGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    General Medical Services (Payments) Board (2002) General Medical Services (Payments) Board Annual Report. GMS (Payments) Board, DublinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations