Medicines containing codeine: perspectives of medical professionals in the Republic of Ireland
- 272 Downloads
The aim of the study was to examine prescribing professional’s perceptions on prescribed and OTC medicines, containing codeine in the Republic of Ireland. A secondary aim was to examine perceptions on codeine dependence, screening and treatment.
A cross-sectional study of a nationally representative group of prescribing professionals was conducted using a questionnaire containing a number of open and closed ended items. Data were analysed using SPSS version 21 and content analysis techniques.
398 medical professionals participated in the study giving a response rate of 18%. 77% of respondents agreed to routinely review patient prescribed codeine. 59% of respondents routinely asked patients about their use of OTC medicines and 50% documented use of OTC codeine in their patients’ medical notes. 93% indicated concern about the potential to purchase codeine from multiple sources. 88% implied that patients did not fully understand the risks of taking OTC medicine containing codeine. Only 21% of respondents were confident in identifying codeine dependence without being informed by the patient and 11.4% agreed to have suitable screening methods in practice. 76% indicated that they would like more instruction on prescribing addictive medicines.
Policy should examine the need for greater public health awareness on codeine use and should examine the role of OTC and internet sales in the development of dependence. Further consideration should be given to training and support for those who prescribe addictive medicines in practice.
KeywordsCodeine Over the counter Prescribing Addiction Misuse Primary care Nurse prescribing
We wish to acknowledge the CODEMISUSED research team and their participation in the collection of data used in this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Sevent Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 under Grant agreement no 611736.
Conflict of interest
Ethical Approval was granted by Waterford Institute of Technology Research Ethics Committee. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Moore A, Collins S, Carroll D, McQuay H, Edwards J (2001) Single dose paracetamol (acetaminophen) with and without codeine for postoperative pain. Cochrane Libr (2):CD001547. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001547
- 9.Dobbin M, Tobin C (2008) Over the counter (OTC) ibuprofen/codeine analgesics: misuse and harm. In: Paper prepared for the National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee (Australia), 22 May 2008Google Scholar
- 14.Foley M, Breindahl T, Hindersson P et al (2016) Misuse of over-the-counter codeine analgesics: does formulation play a role? Public Health 130:95–96Google Scholar
- 18.Van Hout M, Bergin M, Foley M, Rich E, Rapca A, Harris R et al (2014) A Scoping Review of Codeine Use, Misuse and Dependence, final report. In: European Commission 7th Framework Programme, EU, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- 21.Van Hout MC, Horan A, Santlal K (2015) ‘Codeine is my companion’: misuse and dependence on codeine containing medicines in Ireland. I J Psychol Med 1–14. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2015.60
- 22.Mitka M (2014) Curbing counterfeit drug sales. JAMA 311(14):1389Google Scholar
- 25.Foley M, Carney T, Rich E et al (2016) Medical professionals’ perspectives on prescribed and over-the-counter medicines containing codeine: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 6(7):1–10Google Scholar
- 27.Poplas-Susič T, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Kersnik J (2014) Usefulness of the patient information leaflet (PIL) and information on medicines from professionals: a patients’ view. A qualitative study. Zdravniški Vestnik 83(5):368–375Google Scholar
- 28.Tsvetkova A, Todorova A, Petkova V (2014) Patients, pharmacists and physicians views on use of over the counter drugs. A comparative analysis. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 3(12):1–9Google Scholar
- 29.Carney T, Wells J, Bergin M et al (2016) A Comparative exploration of community pharmacists’ views on the nature and management of over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription codeine misuse in three regulatory regimes: Ireland, South Africa and the United Kingdom. Int J Ment Health Addict 14(4):351–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Pleasant A (2016) Health literacy around the world: Part 1. Health literacy efforts outside of the United States. http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Activities/PublicHealth/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/PublicHealth/HealthLiteracy/2012-SEP-24/WorldHealthLit.pdf. Retrieved 2nd August 2016
- 32.De Jongh T, Gurol‐Urganci I, Vodopivec‐Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R (2012) Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self‐management of long‐term illnesses. Cochrane Libr 12:CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2
- 33.Kauppi K, Välimäki M, Hätönen HM et al (2014) Information and communication technology based prompting for treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness. Cochrane Libr. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009960.pub2