Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

, Volume 186, Issue 1, pp 161–177 | Cite as

Fumaric acid esters for psoriasis: a systematic review

Review Article

Abstract

Background

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Effective and safe long term treatment options are required to manage the illness successfully. A number of systemic agents are available, however, each of them has potentially significant side effects. Fumaric acid esters (FAE) are used first line in Germany for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis, however, their use in Ireland is on an unlicensed basis (Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 37:786–801, 2012).

Objectives

The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FAEs in the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in adult patients. The reviewer intends to systematically review all available literature on the efficacy and/or safety of fumaric acid esters in the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in adult patients.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed by one reviewer. The PubMed, TRIP, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration databases were systematically interrogated to include randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of FAEs in the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in adult patients. Inclusion criteria were studies which included adults over 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, who were treated with FAEs and no other systemic anti-psoriatic agents concurrently. Exclusion criteria were studies involving children, mild psoriasis, studies which did not include patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, the use of FAE for the management of illnesses other than psoriasis, and patients treated with more than one systemic anti-psoriatic agent concurrently.

Results

In total 19 articles were selected for review including 2 randomised placebo controlled trials, 1 non-randomised comparative study, 7 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies and 7 case studies. The findings suggest that FAEs are a safe and effective treatment option for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in adult patients. Gastrointestinal side effects may occur on treatment initiation and may be minimised by slow dose titration. Lymphocytopenia and eosinophilia are common, however, they are rarely of significance and there is no high level of evidence available to suggest a resultant increased risk of infection or malignancy. Rarely alterations of renal and hepatic function may occur, however, these are largely reversible on treatment withdrawal.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the use of FAE in the management of moderate to severe psoriasis is a promising treatment option, especially for those patients intolerant of, or unresponsive to other agents. If blood parameters are closely monitored during treatment as per the European Medicine Agencies guidelines (European Medicines Agency, ‘Updated recommendations to minimise the risk of the rare brain infection PML with Tecfidera’, http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Press_release/2015/10/WC500196017.pdf, 2015) they may be safely used in practice. The licensing of FAEs in Ireland for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis would be desirable, increasing available treatment options.

Keywords

Fumaric acid esters Fumaderm Psoriasis 

References

  1. 1.
    Altmeyer PJ, Matthes U, Pawlak F et al (1994) Antipsoriatic effect of fumaric acid derivatives: results of a multicenter double-blind study in 100 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:977–981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barth D, Simon JC, Wetzig T (2011) ‘Malignant melanoma during treatment with fumaric acid esters—coincidence or treatment related? JDDG. J der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 3:223–224Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brewer L, Rogers S (2007) Fumaric acid esters in the management of severe psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol 32:246–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carboni I, De Felice C, De Simoni I et al (2004) Fumaric acid esters in the treatment of psoriasis: an Italian experience. J Dermatol Treat 15:23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ermis U, Weis J, Schulz JB (2013) PML in a patient treated with fumaric acid. N Engl J Med 368(17):1657–1658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fairhurst DA, Ashcroft DM, Griffiths EM (2005) ‘Optimal Management of Severe Plaque Form of Psoriasis. Am J Clin Dermatol 6(5):283–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fika Z, Williams REA, Williamson DJ (2006) Fumaric acid esters in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 154(3):567–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harries MJ, Chalmers RJG, Griffiths CEM (2005) Fumaric acid esters for severe psoriasis: a retrospective review of 58 cases. Br J Dermatol 153:549–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heelan K, Markham T (2012) Fumaric acid esters as a suitable first line treatment for severe psoriasis: an Irish experience. Clin Exp Dermatol 37:786–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoefnagel JJ, Thio HB, Willemze R et al (2003) Long term safety aspects of systemic therapy with fumaric acid esters in severe psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 149:363–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ismail N, Collins P, Rogers S et al (2014) Drug survival of fumaric acid esters for psoriasis: a retrospective study. Br J Dermatol 171:397–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jennings L, Murphy GM (2009) Squamous cell carcinoma as a complication of fumaric acid ester immunosuppression. Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23:1445–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolbach DN, Niebor C (1992) ‘Fumaric acid therapy in psoriasis: Results and side effects of 2 years of treatment’. J Am Acad Dermatol 27(5 part 1): 769–771Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mrowietz U, Christophers E, Altmeyer P (1998) Treatment of severe psoriasis with fumaric acid esters: scientific background and guidelines for therapeutic use. Br J Dermatol 141:424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naldi L, Griffiths CEM (2005) Traditional therapies in the management of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: an assessment of the benefits and risks. Br J Dermatol 152:597–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nugteren-Huying WM, van der Schroeff JG, Hermans J et al (1990) Fumaric acid therapy for psoriasis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol 22(2):311–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogilvie S, Lewis Jones S, Dawe R et al (2011) Proteinuria with fumaric acid ester treatment for psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol 36:632–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pathirana D, Ormerod AD, Saiag P et al (2009) ‘European S3- Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23(2):5–70Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Raschka C, Koch HJ (1999) Long term treatment of psoriasis using fumaric acid preparations can be associated with severe proximal tubular damage. Hum Exp Toxicol 18:738–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reich K, Thaci D, Mrowietz U et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of fumaric acid esters in the long term treatment of psoriasis- a retrospective study (FUTURE). JDDG. J der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 7:603–610Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reid C, Holian J, Kane D et al (2013) De Toni Fanconi Syndrome secondary to fumaric acid esters. Br J Dermatol 169(1):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmitt J, Zhang Z, Wozel G et al (2008) Efficacy and tolerability of biologic and nonbiologic systemic treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Dermatol 159:513–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sladden MJ, Osborne JE, Hutchinson PE (2006) Fumaric acid esters for severe psoriasis: the Leicestershire experience. Br J Dermatol 155:841–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thaçi D, Weisenseel P, Philipp S et al (2013) ‘Efficacy and safety of fumaric acid esters in patients with psoriasis on medication for comorbid conditions – a retrospective evaluation (FACTS). J Ger Soc Dermatol 1610–0379:439–445Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Oosten BW, Killestein J, Barkhof F et al (2013) PML in a patient treated with dimethylfumarate from a compounding pharmacy. N Engl J Med 368(17):1658–1659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu Y, Mills D, Bala M (2008) Psoriasis: cardiovascular risk factors and other disease comorbidities. J Drugs Dermatol 7:373–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    European Medicines Agency (2015). ‘Updated recommendations to minimise the risk of the rare brain infection PML with Tecfidera’. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Press_release/2015/10/WC500196017.pdf. Accessed Mar 1, 2016

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity Hospital LimerickLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations