Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

, Volume 184, Issue 3, pp 659–666 | Cite as

Saving lives, limbs and livelihoods: considerations in restructuring a national trauma service

  • H. M. Mohan
  • D. Mullan
  • F. McDermott
  • R. J. Whelan
  • C. O’Donnell
  • D. C. Winter
Original Article


Study hypothesis

Level 1 trauma centers reduce mortality and improve functional outcomes in major trauma. Despite this, many countries, including Ireland, do not have officially designated major trauma centers (MTC). This study aimed to examine international trauma systems, and determine how to “best fit” trauma care in a small country (Ireland) to international models.


The literature was reviewed to examine international models of trauma systems. An estimate of Irish trauma burden and distribution was made using data from the Road Safety Authority (RSA) on serious or fatal RTAs. Models of a restructured trauma service were constructed and compared with international best practice.


Internationally, a major trauma center surrounded by a regional trauma network has emerged as the gold standard in trauma care. In Ireland, there are no nationally coordinated trauma networks and care is provided by 26 acute hospitals with a mean distance to hospital from RTAs of 20.6 km ± 15.6. Based on our population, Ireland needs two Level 1 MTCs (in the two areas of major population density in the east and south), with robust surrounding trauma networks including Level 2 or 3 trauma centers. With this model, the estimated mean number of cases per Level 1 MTC per year would be 628, with a mean distance to MTC of 80.5 ± 59.2 km, (maximum distance 263.5 km).


Clearly designated and adequately resourced MTCs with trauma networks are needed to improve trauma outcomes, with concomitant investment in pre-hospital infrastructure.


Trauma network Emergency medicine Road traffic accident (RTA) Major trauma center Ireland 



The authors acknowledge the assistance of Prof. Brendan Whelan with the statistical elements of this study.

Conflict of interest


Supplementary material

11845_2014_1234_MOESM1_ESM.doc (41 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 41 kb)


  1. 1.
    Ten Duis HJ, van der Werken C (2003) Trauma care systems in the Netherlands. Injury 34:722–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peden MSR, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder AA, Jarawan E, Mathers C (2004) World report on road traffic injury prevention. World Health OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lendrum RA, Lockey DJ (2013) Trauma system development. Anaesthesia 68(Suppl 1):30–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glance LG, Osler TM, Mukamel DB, Dick AW (2012) Impact of trauma center designation on outcomes: is there a difference between Level I and Level II trauma centers? J Am Coll Surg 215:372–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gabbe BJ, Simpson PM, Sutherland AM et al (2012) Improved functional outcomes for major trauma patients in a regionalized, inclusive trauma system. Ann Surg 255:1009–1015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prada SI, Salkever D, Mackenzie EJ (2012) Level-I trauma center effects on return-to-work outcomes. Eval Rev 36:133–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haider AH, David JS, Zafar SN et al (2013) Comparative effectiveness of inhospital trauma resuscitation at a French trauma center and matched patients treated in the United States. Ann Surg 258(1):178–183PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Curtis KA, Mitchell RJ, Chong SS et al (2012) Injury trends and mortality in adult patients with major trauma in New South Wales. Med J Aust 197:233–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sasser SVM, Kellermann A, Lormand JD Prehospital trauma care systems. Geneva, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morrison JJ, McConnell NJ, Orman JA, Egan G, Jansen JO (2013) Rural and urban distribution of trauma incidents in Scotland. Br J Surg 100:351–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Resources for optimal care of the injured patient American College of Surgeons (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    American College of Surgeons (2006) Consultation/verification program reference guide of selected classificationGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Improving services for major trauma questionnaire Northern Ireland (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Annual population and migration estimates (2012) Ireland Central Statistics OfficeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schadde E, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S et al (2013) Are two-stage hepatectomies associated with more complications than one-stage procedures? HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreatol Biliary Assoc 15:411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    London Trauma Office Annual Report April 2010 to March 2011. London (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    The intercollegiate group on trauma standards RCoSoE (2009) Regional trauma systems interim guidance for commissionersGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Authority RS. Road Safety Strategy 2007–2012. 3rd Road Safety Strategy edn. Road Safety Authority (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S et al (2011) The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients. Ann Surg 254:907–913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor C, Jan S, Curtis K et al (2012) The cost-effectiveness of physician staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) transport to a major trauma centre in NSW. Aust Injury 43:1843–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galvagno SM Jr, Haut ER, Zafar SN et al (2012) Association between helicopter vs ground emergency medical services and survival for adults with major trauma. J Am Med Assoc 307:1602–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ringburg AN, Spanjersberg WR, Frankema SP, Steyerberg EW, Patka P, Schipper IB (2007) Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS): impact on on-scene times. J Trauma 63:258–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galvagno SM Jr, Thomas S, Stephens C et al (2013) Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD009228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Delgado MK, Staudenmayer KL, Wang NE et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for trauma scene transport in the United States. Ann Emerg Med 62(4):351–364PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Durham R, Pracht E, Orban B, Lottenburg L, Tepas J, Flint L (2006) Evaluation of a mature trauma system. Ann Surg 243:775–783 discussion 83–5PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Admission to acute hospitals for injuries as a result of road traffic collisions in Ireland 2005–2009 (2011) Department of Public Health, Navan, Health Service Executive Dublin North EastGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. M. Mohan
    • 1
  • D. Mullan
    • 1
  • F. McDermott
    • 1
  • R. J. Whelan
    • 1
  • C. O’Donnell
    • 2
  • D. C. Winter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySt Vincent’s University HospitalDublinIreland
  2. 2.National Ambulance ServiceHSE, Regional Ambulance Communications CentreLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations