Advertisement

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

, Volume 183, Issue 4, pp 629–632 | Cite as

Behavioural studies of faecal continence in the rat

  • B. K. Soetan
  • P. R. O’Connell
  • J. F. X. Jones
Original Article

Abstract

Background

A behavioural animal model of faecal continence and/or incontinence would be of value in experimental studies of the mechanisms by which sacral neuromodulation can effect continence mechanisms in humans.

Aim

The aim of this behavioural study was to establish whether the rat, an obligate coprophagic species, exhibits patterns of faecal continence.

Methods

Standard rat cages were modified to consist of a food and drink area, a nesting area and an empty latrine area. Three floor pressure pads were connected to hour meters to record the time spent in each area over the course of 4 days. The door to the latrine was open for 2 days and closed for another 2 days to create a physical barrier that could only be surmounted by climbing over a partition.

Results

In the first 2 days, most faecal pellets (74 ± 20 %; p < 0.0001) were deposited in the latrine and this was not changed by door closure (81 ± 13 %). Door closure had no effect per se on pellet output (p = 0.99), nor did it alter the place preference for defaecation (p = 0.17, two factor ANOVA). Rats spent less time in the latrine area accounting for 23 and 13 % of total time before and after the door was closed, respectively. Normal and infrared videography showed that the place preference for pellets was not due to pellet collection for coprophagic purposes.

Conclusions

The rat demonstrates place preference for defaecation and may drop pellets to mark remote boundaries. This simple method may prove useful in future animal studies of neuropathic faecal incontinence and refinement of neuromodulation interventions that lack placebo effects.

Keywords

Faecal incontinence Animal model Pudendal nerve Rat Behavioural studies Tripartite cage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the Health Research Board of Ireland.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Soetan has nothing to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Sukemori S, Ikeda S, Kurihara Y, Ito S (2003) Amino acid, mineral and vitamin levels in hydrous faeces obtained from coprophagy-prevented rats. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 87(5–6):213–220 Epub 2003/05/20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suda K, Setoyama H, Nanno M, Matsumoto S, Kawai M (2013) Involvement of parasympathetic pelvic efferent pathway in psychological stress-induced defecation. World J Gastroenterol 19(8):1200–1209 Epub 2013/03/14PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kimchi T, Terkel J (2001) Magnetic compass orientation in the blind mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi. J Exp Biol 204(Pt 4):751–758 Epub 2001/02/15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffin KM, Pickering M, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell PR, Jones JF (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation increases activation of the primary somatosensory cortex by anal canal stimulation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 98(8):1160–1169 Epub 2011/05/19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Snooks SJ, Swash M (1984) Abnormalities of the innervation of the urethral striated sphincter musculature in incontinence. Br J Urol 56(4):401–405 Epub 1984/08/01PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiff ES, Swash M (1984) Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 71(8):614–616 Epub 1984/08/01PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C (1998) Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 92(6):955–961 Epub 1998/12/05PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerns JM, Damaser MS, Kane JM, Sakamoto K, Benson JT, Shott S et al (2000) Effects of pudendal nerve injury in the female rat. Neurourol Urodyn 19(1):53–69 Epub 1999/12/22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cannon TW, Wojcik EM, Ferguson CL, Saraga S, Thomas C, Damaser MS (2002) Effects of vaginal distension on urethral anatomy and function. BJU Int 90(4):403–407 Epub 2002/08/15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Healy CF, O’Herlihy C, O’Brien C, O’Connell PR, Jones JF (2008) Experimental models of neuropathic fecal incontinence: an animal model of childbirth injury to the pudendal nerve and external anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1619–1626 (discussion 26. Epub 2008/09/10)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peirce C, Healy CF, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell PR, Jones JF (2009) Reduced somatosensory cortical activation in experimental models of neuropathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 52(8):1417–1422 Epub 2009/07/21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Banahan M, Peirce C, Buffini M, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell PR, Jones JF (2010) Atrophy of the sphincters of continence in an experimental model. Colorectal Dis 12(7 Online):e153–e157 (Epub 2009/08/14)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ, Cohen R, Kamm MA (2002) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence due to systemic sclerosis. Gut 51(6):881–883 Epub 2002/11/13PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matzel KE, Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W (2003) Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 74(1):26–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leroi AM, Michot F, Grise P, Denis P (2001) Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44(6):779–789 Epub 2001/06/08PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. K. Soetan
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. R. O’Connell
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. F. X. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Anatomy, School of Medicine and Medical Science, Health Science CentreUniversity College DublinDublin 4Ireland
  2. 2.Surgical Professorial UnitSt.Vincent’s University HospitalDublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations