Bench and Bedside? Surgeons’ views on the role of research in surgical training
- 117 Downloads
Internationally, surgical training is facing the challenge of balancing research and clinical experience in the context of reduced working hours. This study aimed to investigate trainees and trainers’ views on surgeons participating in full-time research during surgical training.
An anonymous voluntary survey was conducted of surgical trainers and trainees in two training systems. To examine surgeons’ views across two different training schemes, surgeons were surveyed in Ireland (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland) and in a Canadian centre (University of Toronto) between January 2009 and September 2010 (n = 397 respondents).
The majority of respondents felt that time spent in research by trainees was important for surgery as a specialty, while 65 % felt that research was important for surgical trainees (trainers 79 %, trainees 60 %, p = 0.001). A higher proportion of Canadian surgeons reported that they enjoyed their time spent in research, compared to Irish surgeons (84 vs. 66 %, p = 0.05). Financial worries and loss of clinical time were common demotivating factors. Full-time research was more popular than part-time options to obtain a post-graduate degree.
Most agree that research remains an important component of surgical training. However, there are significant differences in opinion among surgeons in different countries on the precise role and structure of research in surgical training.
KeywordsResearch Surgical training Surgical education Medical education Surgical research Postgraduate surgical research
The Authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of Ms. Jane Cunningham, National Surgical Training Centre, RCSI, Dublin 2, Ireland and Dr. Ronald Levine and Mr. Robert Gardin, University of Toronto, Canada for assisting in distribution of the survey.
Conflict of interest
The Authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 9.Society for Academic and Research Surgery (SARS) (2009) The place of research and other educational experience in UK surgical training:guidance for surgical trainees. pp 1–15Google Scholar
- 12.Englesbe MJ, Sung RS, Segev DL (2011) Young transplant surgeons and NIH funding. Am J Transplant 11(2):245–252Google Scholar