Electronic clinical decision support systems attitudes and barriers to use in the oncology setting
- 263 Downloads
There is little evidence regarding attitudes to clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in oncology.
We examined the current usage, awareness, and concerns of Irish medical oncologists and oncology pharmacists in this area.
A questionnaire was sent to 27 medical oncologists and 34 oncology pharmacists, identified through professional interest groups. Respondents ranked concerns regarding their use of a CDSS on a scale from 1 to 4, with 4 being most important.
Overall, 67% (41/61) responded, 48% (13/27) of oncologists and 82% (28/34) of pharmacists surveyed. Concerns included “difficulty defining complex clinical situations with a set of rules” (mean ± SD) (3.2 ± 0.9), “ensuring evidence base is up to date and relevant” (3.2 ± 0.9) and “lack of clinically relevant suggestions” (2.9 ± 0.9). Ninety-three percent reported using a CDSS but 54% were unaware of this.
While there are benefits to using a CDSS, concerns must be addressed through user education. This may be a starting point for a user-centred design approach to the development of future local systems through a consultative process.
KeywordsInformation technology Clinical decision support systems Oncology Healthcare Informatics
Conflict of interest
- 1.Coiera E (2003) Guide to health informatics/enrico coiera. Arnold, London (distributed in the USA by Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
- 2.Foubert J, Aapro M, Soubeyran P et al (2007) Respond—raising awareness of anemia in oncology centers through computer algorithm driven guidelines: assessment of intraclass correlation metrics for the accuracy of algorithmic definitions. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 25 (18 suppl):19633Google Scholar
- 9.Ash JS, Sittig DF, Campbell E, Guappone K, Dykstra RH (2006) An unintended consequence of CPOE implementation: shifts in power, control, and autonomy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 11–15Google Scholar