Skip to main content
Log in

The benefits of a laparoscopic approach in ileal pouch anal anastomosis formation: a single institutional retrospective case-matched experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

A laparoscopic approach to ileoanal pouch formation is novel. By using prospectively gathered data, laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy procedures in mucosal ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients were compared using a case-matched design.

Methods

Ten consecutive patients have had laparoscopic ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) since April 2005. Their intraoperative findings, immediate and early postoperative outcomes are compared with ten non-selected patients who had an open IPAA pre April 2005.

Results

Laparoscopic IPAA group had a shorter time to ileostomy function, a reduced mean time to regular diet and a mean shorter hospital stay. Their overall opioid analgesia requirements were 50% that of the open group. There were no re-operations or readmissions in either group. Mean operative time was longer for the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing laparoscopic IPAA can expect faster postoperative gastrointestinal recovery, reduced blood loss, reduced opioid requirements and improved cosmesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams NS (1989) Restorative proctocolectomy is the first choice elective surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 76(11):1109–1110. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800761103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ et al (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243(5):667–670. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000216762.83407.d2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kienle P, Z’Graggen K, Schmidt J et al (2005) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 92:88–93. doi:10.1002/bjs.4772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ky AJ, Sonoda T, Milson JW (2002) One stage laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: an alternative to the conventional approach? Dis Colon Rectum 45:207–211. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6149-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kienle P, Weitz J, Benner A et al (2003) Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy. Surg Endosc 17:716–720. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-9159-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Piotrowick K et al (2005) Laparoscopic-assisted vs open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case matched series. Dis Colon Rectum

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We, the authors, have no financial association with this manuscript nor any conflict of interest. The material has not been submitted for peer review to any other journal. We have all seen and approved the manuscript and are indeed fully conversant with its contents.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, J., Condon, E.T., Redmond, H.P. et al. The benefits of a laparoscopic approach in ileal pouch anal anastomosis formation: a single institutional retrospective case-matched experience. Ir J Med Sci 179, 197–200 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0399-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0399-0

Keywords

Navigation