Resuscitation decisions in Irish long-stay units

Original Article

Abstract

Background

Little is known of how cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions are made in Irish long-term care settings.

Aim

To examine how CPR decisions are made in Irish long-stay units and those factors associated with use or non-use of CPR.

Methods

We surveyed each public long-stay unit and a random sample of private nursing homes across the country.

Results

Of the 84 long-stay units that responded (response rate 58%), basic CPR had been performed in 32% and advanced CPR (including defibrillation) in 10%. Only 13% of the units had a written CPR policy. Units performing CPR (= 35) were closer to an acute hospital, more likely to have short-term residents and more likely to have a CPR policy (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between public and private units.

Conclusion

The widely disparate approaches to CPR in different Irish long-stay units suggest the need for national guidelines on this issue.

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Long-term care Aged 

References

  1. 1.
    O’Keeffe ST (2001) Development and implementation of resuscitation guidelines: a personal experience. Age Ageing 30:19–25. doi:10.1093/ageing/30.1.19 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McNamee J, O’Keeffe ST (2004) Documentation of do-not-resuscitate orders in an Irish hospital. Ir J Med Sci 173:99–101. doi:10.1007/BF02914567 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fennell J, Sheikh A, Butler M, Saaidin N (2006) Dissatisfaction with Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation orders: a nationwide study of Irish consultant physician practices. Ir Med J 99:208–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finucane TE, Boyer JT, Bulmash J et al (1991) The incidence of attempted CPR in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:624–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kane RS, Burns EA (1997) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation policies in long-term care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:154–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conroy SP, Luxton T, Dingwall R, Harwood RH, Gladman JR (2006) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in continuing care settings: time for a rethink? BMJ 332:479–482. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7539.479 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Keeffe ST, Ebell MH (1994) Prediction of failure to survive following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of two predictive instruments. Resuscitation 28:21–25. doi:10.1016/0300-9572(94)90050-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    British MedicalAssociation, ResuscitationCouncil (UK), Royal College of Nursing (2002) Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing. J Med Ethics 27(5):310–316Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woollard M (2001) Public access defibrillation: a shocking idea? J Public Health Med 23:98–102. doi:10.1093/pubmed/23.2.98 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Neill D (2001) Present, rather than, advance directives. Lancet 358:1921–1922. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06973-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geriatric MedicineGalway University HospitalsGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Unit 4Merlin Park University HospitalGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations