Advertisement

Surgical audit using the POSSUM scoring tool in vascular surgery patients

  • J. S. Byrne
  • E. T. Condon
  • M. Ahmed
  • R. Conroy
  • D. Mehigan
  • S. J. Sheehan
  • M. C. Barry
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Currently, crude morbidity and mortality rates are used to assess vascular surgical outcome. However, as a high-risk specialty, this may not be representative of quality of care.

Aim

We evaluated the POSSUM score as a measure of performance in our vascular unit, and also its usefulness on an individual patient basis for predicting outcome.

Patients and methods

A total of 106 patients were prospectively scored using the vascular-POSSUM score, and mean predicted and observed morbidity and mortality were compared with one-sample t tests.

Results

Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to determine if POSSUM scores were associated with the end-points of morbidity and mortality. Predicted and observed morbidity (41 and 35.8%, respectively) were not significantly different (P = 0.066). POSSUM did, however, over-predict mortality at 9.7% compared to the observed mortality of 5.7% (P = 0.021). While the discrimination for predicting morbidity was poor, POSSUM scores were significantly associated with mortality end-points (area under ROC curve = 0.97250). POSSUM morbidity scores closely correlate with observed outcomes.

Conclusion

Although POSSUM did over-predict mortality, high mortality scores may be useful for identifying patients at particularly high risk post-operatively. The POSSUM score is a useful adjunct to interpretation of morbidity and mortality statistics, and we would recommend its wider implementation for surgical audit.

Keywords

POSSUM Audit Vascular surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Todd I Guidelines to Clinical Audit in Surgical Practice (1989) Advice document. Royal College of Surgeons of England, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones HJ, de Cossart L (1999) Risk scoring in surgical patients. Br J Surg 86(2):149–157. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01006.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78(3):355–360. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780327 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I, Horstmann O, Brinker J, Becker H (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4608 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cerra FB, Negro F, Abrams J (1990) APACHE II score does not predict multiple organ failure or mortality in postoperative surgical patients. Arch Surg 125(4):519–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Copeland GP, Jones D, Wilcox A, Harris PL (1993) Comparitive vascular audit using the POSSUM scoring system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75:175–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prytherch DR, Ridler BMF, Beard JD, Earnshaw JJ (2001) A model for national outcome audit in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:477–483. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1369 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman PC, May J, Macfie J (1994) Comparitive audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg 81:1492–1494. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800811031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Midwinter MJ, Tytherleigh M, Ashley S (1999) Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation. Br J Surg 86:471–474. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01112.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Copeland GP, Sagar P, Brennan J, Roberts G, Ward J, Cornford P, Millar A, Harris C (1995) Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance: a 1-year study. Br J Surg 82:408–411. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820344 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cleary M, Cahill RA, Younis F, Sheehan SJ, Mehigan D, Barry MC (2004) Improved management of high risk patients for elective abdominal aortic aneursym repair by provision of a high dependency step-down unit. In: Sylvester O’Halloran Surgical Meeting. Limerick, Ireland, MarchGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whiteley MS, Prytherch DR, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG (1996) An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 83:812–815. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830628 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wijesinghe LD, Mahmood T, Scott DJA, Berridge DC, Kent PJ, Kester RC (1998) Comparison of POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation for predicting death following vascular surgery. Br J Surg 85:209–212. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00709.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. S. Byrne
    • 1
  • E. T. Condon
    • 1
  • M. Ahmed
    • 1
  • R. Conroy
    • 2
  • D. Mehigan
    • 1
  • S. J. Sheehan
    • 1
  • M. C. Barry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Vascular SurgerySt Vincent’s HospitalDublin 4Ireland
  2. 2.Department of Medical StatisticsRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations