Advertisement

Small-scale Forestry

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 353–372 | Cite as

Assessing Wa-u Agroforestry in the Course of Swidden Transformation: A Case Study in Southern Chin State, Myanmar

  • Nyein ChanEmail author
  • Shinya Takeda
Original Research
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Swidden cultivation has been gradually transformed into other types of land-uses because of economic, political and social changes. In southern Chin State, Myanmar, the traditional swidden agriculture is being replaced by Wa-u (Amorphophallus bulbifer) cultivation in the fallows due to the increasing abandonment of swidden fallows and recent development of Wa-u market access. Also, the government of Myanmar promoted community participation in commercialized agriculture and forestry activities through community-based agroforestry systems. This study was carried out in two villages in southern Chin State, Myanmar to fill the research gap about the different Wa-u cultivation methods commonly applied in swidden cultivated fallows in term of cost-benefit and biomass analysis, socio-economically and environmentally contributing to community-based agroforestry systems in the region. The cost-benefit analysis showed that a modified traditional taungya method (mTTM) produced the best profit (228,571 Kyats per acre) among the cultivation methods. Also, the biomass analysis of tree vegetation showed that the Wa-u cultivated sites by mTTM has significantly higher basal area (21.1 ± 3.57 m2ha−1) and biomass accumulation (65.4 ± 11.17 Mgha−1) than other methods. As a result, Wa-u cultivation with maintenance of the tree stands could be promoted not only for socio-economic development but also for environmental conservation. This study suggests that Wa-u is promising as an intercrop species in agroforestry systems, and can be effectively incorporated into community-based agroforestry systems.

Keywords

Amorphophallus bulbifer Community-based agroforestry system Cost-benefit analysis Southern Chin State Swidden agriculture 

Notes

Supplementary material

11842_2019_9422_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

References

  1. Boonkird SA, Fernandes ECM, Nair PKR (1984) Forest villages: an agroforestry approach to rehabilitating forest land degraded by shifting cultivation in Thailand. Agrofor Syst 2:87–102Google Scholar
  2. Central Statistical Organization (2008) Myanmar statistical year book 2008. Ministry of Planning and Finance, Central Statistical Organization (CSO), NaypyitawGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan N, Takeda S (2016) The transition away from swidden agriculture and trends in biomass accumulation in fallow forests. Mt Res Dev 36(3):320–331.  https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00063-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choocharoen C, Schneider A, Neef A, Georgiadis P (2013) Income options for the poorest of the poor: the case of cardamon in Northern Laos. Small-Scale For 12:193–213Google Scholar
  5. Chua M, Baldwin TC, Hocking TJ et al (2010) Traditional uses and potential health benefits of Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch ex N. E. Br. J Ethnopharmacol 128(2):268–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cramb RA, Colfer CP, Dressler W et al (2009) Swidden transformations and rural livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Hum Ecol 37(3):323–346Google Scholar
  7. Department of Population (2015) The 2014 Myanmar population and housing census: highlights of the main results (census report volume 2-A). Department of Population (DoP), Ministry of Immigration and Population, NaypyitawGoogle Scholar
  8. ECDF [Ethnic Community Development Forum] (2016) Our customary lands: community-based sustainable natural resource management in Burma. A report by ECDF, Yangon. Available at https://www.tni.org/files/article-downloads/our_customary_land_-_eng.pdf
  9. Ei, Kosaka YE, Takeda S (2017) Underground biomass accumulation of two economically important non-timber forest products is influcenced by ecological settings and swiddeners’ management in the Bago Mountains, Myanmar. For Ecol Manag 404:330–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Enri C (2009) Shifting the blame? Southeast Asia’s indigenous peoples and shifting cultivation in the age of climate change. Indig Aff 1:38–49Google Scholar
  11. FAO/NRL (2015) Geographical distribution of 10 dominant soil types in Myanmar. http://www.fao.org/nr/myanmar/SoilMap_Myanmar_300dpi.jpg. Accessed 15 Aug 2015
  12. Fernandes ECM, Oktingati A, Maghembe J (1985) The Chagga homegardens: a multistoried agroforestry cropping system on Mt. Kilimanjaro (Northern Tanzania). Agrofor Syst 2(2):73–86Google Scholar
  13. Fonzen PF, Oberholzer E (1984) Use of multipurpose trees in hill farming systems in Western Nepal. Agrofor Syst 2:187–197Google Scholar
  14. Forest Department (1995) Myanmar forest policy 1995. Ministry of Forestry, YangonGoogle Scholar
  15. Forest Department (2011) Forestry in Myanmar. Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry. Forest Department (FD), Nay Pyi TawGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox J (2000) How blaming ‘slash and burn’ farmers is deforesting mainland Southeast Asia. Asia-Pac Issues (East-West Center) 47:1–8Google Scholar
  17. Fujikawa K, Hamaguchi M, Yamamoto N, Ikeda H, Srisanga P, Soe Tin Mya (2012) Botanical expedition to Natma Taung (Mt. Victoria) National Park, Chin State, west-central Myanmar in 2012. Newslett Himal Bot 46:1–12Google Scholar
  18. Fukushima M, Kanzaki M, Thein HM, Minn YZ (2007) Recovery process of fallow vegetation in the traditional karen swidden cultivation system in the Bago Mountain Range, Myanmar (ecological resource use and social change in the minority regions of Myanmar). Southeast Asian Stud 45(3):303–316Google Scholar
  19. Halberg N, Panneerselvam P, Treyer S (2015) Eco-functional intensification and food security: synergy or compromise? Sustain Agric Res 4(3):126–139.  https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v4n3p126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen PK (1997) Shifting cultivation development in nothern Laos. In: Chapman EC et al (eds) Upland farming systems in the Lao PDR—problems and opportunities for livestock. ACIAR, Canberra, pp 34–42Google Scholar
  21. Hetterscheid W, Ittenbach S (1996) Everything you always wanted to know about Amorphophallus, but were afraid to stick your nose into. Aroideana 19:7–131Google Scholar
  22. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (2013) Improved production technology for elephant foot yam. Ext Folder 61:1–5Google Scholar
  23. Ishitsuka S (2012) A study on the change of the konnyaku trade under tariff system shift. Bull Fac Agric Life Sci Hirosaki Univ 14:1–11Google Scholar
  24. Japan International Cooperation Agency (2013) Education and training of Myanmar personnel for the realization of phyto-diversity conservation and sustainable use of plant resources to improve economy of the rural population (project report). The Kochi Prefectural Makino Memorial Foundation, Inc and JICA, ShikokuGoogle Scholar
  25. Kress WJ, Robert AD, Ellen F, Kyi YY (2003) A checklist of the trees, shrubs, herbs, and climbers of Myanmar. Smithsonian Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Lal R (1989) Potential of agroforestry as a sustainable alternative to shifting cultivation: concluding remarks. Agrofor Syst 8(3):239–242Google Scholar
  27. Long C, Cai K, Marr K, Guo X, Ouyang Z (2003) Lacquer-based agroforestry system in western Yunnan, China. Agrofor Syst 57(2):109–116Google Scholar
  28. Mather AS (1992) The forest transition. Area 24(4):367–379Google Scholar
  29. Mertz O (2009) Trends in shifting cultivation and the REDD mechanism. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1(2):156–160Google Scholar
  30. Mertz O, Padoch C, Fox J, Cramb RA, Leisz SJ, Lam NT, Vien TD (2009) Swidden change in Southeast Asia: understanding causes and consequences. Hum Ecol 37(3):259–264Google Scholar
  31. MOI [Ministry of Informatino] (2008) Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, Yangon, MyanmarGoogle Scholar
  32. Nair PKR (1989) Agroforestry systems in the tropics. Kluwer Academic Publishers in Co-operation with ICRAF, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  33. Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  34. Nair MA, Sreedharan C (1986) Agroforestry farming systems in the homesteads of Kerala, southern India. Agrofor Syst 4:339–363Google Scholar
  35. Nakao S (1966) The origin of the cultivated plants and farming. Iwanami Publishing House, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  36. Nedunchezhiyan M, Saurabh A, Ranasingh N (2006) Elephant foot yam: a commercial crop for Orissa. Orissa Review 71. Available at http://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/Aug2006/engpdf/71-72.pdf
  37. NLRMCC [National Land Resource Management Central Committee] (2016) National land use policy. NLRMCC, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar. Available at http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/mya152783.pdf
  38. Oberndorf RB (2012) Legal review of recently enacted farmland law and vacant, fallow and virgin lands management law: improving the legal and policy frameworks relating to land management in Myanmar. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_3274.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2015
  39. Rahman SA, Rahman MF, Sunderland T (2014) Increasing tree cover in degrading landscapes: ‘integration’ and ‘intensification’ of smallholder forest culture in the Alutilla Valley, Matiranga, Bangladesh. Small-Scale For 13:237–249Google Scholar
  40. Schmidt-Vogt D, Leisz S, Mertz O, Heinimann A, Thiha T, Messerli P, Epprecht M, Cu PV, Chi VK, Hardiono M, Dao TM (2009) An assessment of trends in the extent of swidden in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology 37(3):269–280Google Scholar
  41. Stephan SD (2013) A regional perspective on poverty in Myanmar. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), YangonGoogle Scholar
  42. Suzuki R, Takeda S, Thein HM (2007) Analysis of land use history and fallow vegetation recovery: a case study of shifting cultivation by the Karen in the Bago Mountains, Myanmar. Southeast Asian Stud 45(3):343–358Google Scholar
  43. Takahashi A (2007) Swiddens, rice terraces, and malay connections: resource use and socio-economic strata in the Chin Hills, Myanmar. Southeast Asian Stud 45(3):404–427Google Scholar
  44. Takeda S, Suzuki R, Thein HM (2007) Mapping shifting cultivation fields in a Karen Area of the Bago Mountains, Myanmar. Southeast Asian Stud 45(3):334–342Google Scholar
  45. Tanaka N (2005) Plant inventory research: contributions to the flora of Myanmar. Acta Phytotax Geobot 56(1):21–26Google Scholar
  46. The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (2012a) The farmland law Myanmar 2012. The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, Nay Pyi TawGoogle Scholar
  47. The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (2012b) The vacant, fallow and virgin lands management law Myanmar 2012. The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, Nay Pyi TawGoogle Scholar
  48. UNDP-Myanmar (2011) Integrated household living conditions survey in Myanmar: poverty profile. UNDP-Myanmar, YangonGoogle Scholar
  49. United Nations Population Fund (2010) Report on situation analysis of population and development, reproductive health and gender in Myanmar. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Nay Pyi TawGoogle Scholar
  50. van Vliet N, Mertz O, Birch-Thomsen T, Schmook B (2013) Is there a continuing rationale for swidden cultivation in the 21st century? Hum Ecol 41(1):1–5Google Scholar
  51. Vicol M, Pritchard B, Htay YY (2018) Rethinking the role of agriculture as a driver of social and economic transformation in Southeast Asia’s upland regions: the view from Chin State, Myanmar. Land Use Policy 72:451–460Google Scholar
  52. Win S (2004) Investigation on shifting cultivation practices conducted by the hill tribes for the development of suitable agroforestry techniques in Myanmar. FRI (For Res Inst Leafl) 2:28–96Google Scholar
  53. Win TM, Lin KS, Aung PH, Thant M (2012) Report on market analysis of agricultural products in southern Chin State. Solidarites International (SI), KachinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steve Harrison, John Herbohn 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Forestry and Environmental ScienceNay Pyi TawMyanmar
  2. 2.Graduate School of Asian and African Area StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations