Advertisement

Small-scale Forestry

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 395–417 | Cite as

“A Privilege and a Challenge”: Valuation of Heirs’ Property by African American Landowners and Implications for Forest Management in the Southeastern U.S.

  • Sarah Hitchner
  • John Schelhas
  • Cassandra Johnson Gaither
Research Paper

Abstract

African Americans have historically struggled to retain land that has been held in their families for generations as heirs’ property, or land held collectively by heirs of the original owners without clear title. Ethnographic interviews with sixty landholding African American families in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Alabama reveal the cultural meanings associated with family land, forestland in particular, and the role of heirs’ property in inhibiting forest management, including the threat of land loss, intra-family conflict, and legal limitations on forestry activities. The majority of interviewees have a strong desire to pass family land on to their heirs, but they also need the land to be economically productive. Sustainable forest management offers both an incentive to obtain clear title to heirs’ property land and a means of paying property taxes and generating intergenerational wealth within families. The U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities is currently collaborating with local institutions in several states in an innovative program designed to help African American landowners navigate the legal system in order to obtain clear title and provide educational workshops about the financial and ecological benefits of sustainable forestry as well as site visits by consulting foresters. Analysis of the situations faced by African Americans with heirs’ property adds to the diversity of our understandings of the complex relationships between land tenure and forestry, with potential application for other minority communities in the U.S. and elsewhere.

Keywords

African Americans Forest landowners Minority landowners Family forests Heirs’ property Black land loss Sustainable forest management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted with funding from the U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities, as part of the “Sustainable Forestry and African American Land Retention Program” jointly funded by The Endowment, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the USDA Forest Service. We would like to thank the project foresters and partner organizations, as well as all participating landowners, in each state. We would specifically like to acknowledge Sam Cook, Alton Perry, Andrew Williams, Hodges Smith, and Alex Harvey for assistance with field work. We also gratefully acknowledge the grant management assistance of the Institute for Behavioral Research and the research support of the Center for Integrative Conservation Research at the University of Georgia.

References

  1. Baab CH (2011) Heir property: a constraint for planners, an opportunity for communities: the legacy of Steve Larkin. Plan Environ Law 63(11):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartelme T (2000) Heirs property tangle leads to loss of land. Post and Courier, December 24, 2000. http://archives.postandcourier.com/archive/arch00/1200/arc1224276403.shtml. Website has since been dismantled with no forwarding address
  3. Bartelme T (2001) Families evicted from heirs’ property: deputies enforce court’s directive after relative’s lawsuit leads to sale order. Post and Courier, September 28, 2001. http://archives.postandcourier.com/archive/arch01/0901/arc0928311298.shtml. Website has since been dismantled with no forwarding address
  4. Bartelme T (2002) Heirs land at risk. Post and Courier, June 23, 2002. http://archives.postandcourier.com/archive/arch02/0602/arc0623648840.shtml. Website has since been dismantled with no forwarding address
  5. Beebe J (1995) Basic concepts and techniques of rapid appraisal. Hum Org 54(1):42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butkus AA (2012) ‘The worst problem no one has ever heard of’: heirs’ property and its cultural significance to Gullah–Geechee residents of the South Carolina lowcountry. Thesis, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler BJ, Hewes JH, Dickinson B, Andrejczyk K, Markowski-Lindsay M, Butler SM (2015) National Woodland Owner Survey 2011–2013. Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/nwos/results/
  8. Casagrande JG Jr (1986) Acquiring property through forced partitioning sales: abuses and remedies. Boston Coll Law Rev 27(4):755–783Google Scholar
  9. Chambers R (1992) Rural appraisal: rapid, relaxed and participatory. IDS discussion paper 311, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandler AB (2005) ‘The loss in my bones’: protecting African American heirs’ property with the public use doctrine. William Mary Bill Rights J 14(1):387–414Google Scholar
  11. Chang Y (2012) Tenancy in ‘anticommons’? A theoretical and empirical analysis of co-ownership. J Leg Anal. doi: 10.2139/ssm.1881329 Google Scholar
  12. Christian CS, Fraser RF, Gyawali B, Scott C (2013) Participation of minorities in cost-share programs: the experience of a small underserved landowners’ group in Alabama. J Sustain Dev 6(4):70–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collinson M (1981) A low cost approach to understanding small farmers. Agric Adm 8:433–450Google Scholar
  14. Conway GR (1985) Agroecosystem analysis. Agric Adm 20:31–55Google Scholar
  15. Copeland RW (2013) In the beginning: origins of African American real property ownership in the United States. J Black Stud 44(6):646–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig-Taylor P (2000) Through a colored looking glass: a view of judicial partition, family land loss, and rule setting. Wash Univ Law Q 78(2):737–788Google Scholar
  17. Deaton BJ (2012) A review and assessment of the heirs’ property issue in the United States. J Econ Issues 46(3):615–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diop A, Fraser R (2009) A community-based forestry approach to poverty alleviation in Alabama’s Black Belt region. Int For Rev 11(2):186–196Google Scholar
  19. Dyer JF, Bailey C (2008) A place to call home: cultural understandings of heir property among rural African Americans. Rural Soc 73(3):317–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyer JF, Bailey C, Van Tran N (2009) Ownership characteristics of heir property in a Black Belt county: a quantitative approach. South Rural Soc 24(2):192–217Google Scholar
  21. Gan J, Kolison SH Jr (1999) Minority forest landowners in southeastern Alabama. South J Appl For 23:175–178Google Scholar
  22. Gan J, Onianwa O, Schelhas J, Wheelock GC, Dubois MR (2005) Does race matter in landowners’ participation in conservation incentive programs? Soc Natl Res 18:431–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geddings T (2010) Heirs’ property: a quagmire for the unprepared. South Car Law, July 2010, pp 25–31Google Scholar
  24. Georgia Appleseed Center for Law and Justice (2013) Unlocking heir property ownership: assessing the impact on low and mid-income Georgians and their communities. Georgia Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibbs GR (2002) Qualitative data analysis: explorations with NVivo. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilbert J, Sharp G, Felin MS (2002) The loss and persistence of black-owned farms and farmland: a review of the research literature and its implications. South Rural Soc 18:1–30Google Scholar
  27. Goluboff SL (2011) Making African American homeplaces in rural Virginia. ETHOS 39(3):368–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gordon JS, Barton A, Adams K (2013) An exploration of African American forest landowners in Mississippi. Rural Soc 78(4):473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamilton J, Fraser R, Schelhas J (2007) An evolving model of outreach and land management training for limited resources, minority landowners. In: Tackie NO, Zabawa R, Baharanyi N, Hill W (eds) Strategies to influence the 2007 Farm Bill and rural policies: impact on diverse cultures, rural communities and underserved farmers. Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, pp 76–82Google Scholar
  30. Hildebrand PE (1981) Combining disciplines in rapid appraisal: the sondeo approach. Agric Adm 8:423–432Google Scholar
  31. Hilliard-Clark J, Chesney CE (1985) Black woodland owners: a profile. J For 83(11):674–679Google Scholar
  32. Hinson WR, Robinson E (2008) ‘We didn’t get nothing:’ the plight of black farmers. J Afr Am Stud 12:283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes HG, Monaghan TA (2001) Underserved forest landowner workshops: an opportunity for both landowners and extension. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO extension working party symposium. www.regional.org.au/au/iufro/2001/hughes.htm
  34. Hughes G, Measells MK, Grado SC, Dunn MA, Idassi JO, Zielinske RJ (2005) Underserved forest landowner workshops: opportunities for landowners and extension. J Ext. http://www.joe.org/joe/2005august/a5.shtml
  35. Krysan M, Schuman H, Scott LJ, Beatty P (1994) Response rates and response contents in mail versus face-to-face surveys. Publ Opin Q 58:381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGee L, Boone R (1976) A study of rural landownership, control problems and attitudes of blacks toward rural land. Cooperative State Research Service Document, Washington, p 138Google Scholar
  37. Merem E (2006) The loss of agricultural land among black farmers. West J Black Stud 30(2):89–102Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell TW (2001) From reconstruction to deconstruction: undermining black landownership, political independence, and community through partition sales of tenancies in common. Northwest Univ Law Rev 95(2):505–580Google Scholar
  39. Mitchell TW (2005) Destabilizing the normalization of rural black land loss: a critical role for legal empiricism. Wis L Rev 2005(2):557–615Google Scholar
  40. Mitchell TW (2014) Reforming property law to address devastating land loss. Ala Law Rev 66(1):1–61Google Scholar
  41. Onianwa OO, Wheelock GC, Dubois MR, Warren ST (1999) Assessing the retention potential of Conservation Reserve Program practices in Alabama. South J Appl For 23(2):83–87Google Scholar
  42. Reid DA (2003) African Americans and land loss in Texas: government duplicity and discrimination based on race and class. Agric Hist 77(2):258–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rivers FR (2006) The public trust debate: implications for heirs’ property along the Gullah Coast. Southeast Environ Law J 15:147–169Google Scholar
  44. Russell D, Harshbarger C (2003) GroundWork for community-based conservation: strategies for social research. AltaMira Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  45. Schelhas J, Zhang Y, Zabawa R, Zheng B (2012) Exploring family forest landowner diversity: place, race, and gender in Alabama. Int J Soc For 5(1):1–21Google Scholar
  46. Schelhas J, Hitchner S, Johnson-Gaither C, Fraser R, Jennings V, Diop A (2016) Engaging African American landowners in sustainable forest management. J For. doi: 10.5849/joj.15-116 Google Scholar
  47. Zabawa R (1991) The Black farmer and land in south central Alabama: strategies for preserving a scarce resource. Hum Ecol 19(1):61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zabawa R, Siaway A, Baharanyi N (1990) The decline of black farmers and strategies for survival. South Rural Soc 7:106–121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steve Harrison, John Herbohn 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Integrative Conservation ResearchUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Southern Research Station, USDA Forest ServiceAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations